Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California

Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California
WEBSITE       RESUME       CONTACT       FACEBOOK        LINKEDIN       
Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

California Assembly Bill AB 948 signed by Governor inre Real Estate Appraisal, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers, by Mary Cummins

California Bill AB 948 Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers, Real Estate Appraisal , Mary Cummins, Los Angeles, Governor Gavin Newsom, signed, license, continuing education, bias, complaints, race, discrimination

Governor Gavin Newsom just signed California Assembly Bill AB 948. AB 948 modifies and adds regulations for appraising, buying, selling, making loans on real estate in California. The new regulations have to do with any alleged bias from anyone. This includes lenders, mortgage brokers, real estate agents and real estate appraisers. 

It's already illegal to discriminate in real estate and housing per the Fair Housing Act of 1968. This new bill basically just restates that. It also adds new educational requirements in regard to bias. They aren't additional educational hours. They are just specific hours for new applicants and renewals.

The bill amends "Sections 11340 and 11360 of, and to add Sections 11310.3 and 11424 to, the Business and Professions Code, to add Section 1102.6g to the Civil Code, and to amend Section 12955 of the Government Code, relating to real estate."

From the Bill, "LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 948, Holden. Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers: disclosures: demographic information: reporting: continuing education.

Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers’ Licensing and Certification Law, creates a Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers within the Department of Consumer Affairs to administer and enforce that law. Existing law requires the protection of the public to be the highest priority for the bureau in exercising its licensing, regulatory, and disciplinary functions.

This bill, among other things, would require the bureau to place on an existing complaint form a check box asking if the complainant believes that the opinion of the value of the real estate is below market value. The bill would also require the bureau to collect specified demographic information, voluntarily provided, regarding sellers, those seeking to refinance, buyers, or an authorized representative in real estate transactions making a complaint. The bill would require the bureau to compile the collected demographic information and report that information to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2024.

This bill would prohibit a licensee from basing their appraisal of the market value of a property on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, gender expression, age, national origin, disability, marital status, source of income, sexual orientation, familial status, employment status, or military status of either the present or prospective owners or occupants of the subject property, or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property, or on any other basis prohibited by the federal Fair Housing Act.

Existing law requires the Chief of the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers to adopt regulations governing the process and procedures for applying for a license, including education and experience equivalency, and for renewal of a license, including, but not limited to, continuing education requirements on a 4-year cycle.

This bill would require, beginning January 1, 2023, an applicant to complete at least one hour of instruction in cultural competency, as defined. The bill, as part of the continuing education requirement in order to renew a license or restore a license to active status, would require for each licensee renewing on or after January 1, 2023, at least 2 hours of elimination of bias training. Beginning January 1, 2023, a licensee would be required to complete at least one hour of instruction in cultural competency every 4 years.

Existing law requires that specified disclosures be made upon transfer by sale, exchange, real property sales contract, lease with an option to purchase, any other option to purchase, or ground lease coupled with improvements, of any single-family residential property.

This bill, after July 1, 2022, would require that every contract for the sale of single-family residential real property contain a notice stating that any appraisal of the property is required to be unbiased, objective, and not influenced by improper or illegal considerations. The bill would require the notice to include information regarding reporting biased appraisals to the financial institution or mortgage broker that hired the appraiser or the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers. The bill would also require the notice to be delivered by a licensed person, as defined, refinancing a first lien purchase money loan secured by residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units either prior to, or with, the loan estimate or the mortgage loan disclosure statement.

Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, prohibits housing discrimination, including discrimination through public or private land use practices, decisions, or authorizations, and based on specified personal characteristics. Existing law makes it unlawful for any person or other organization or entity whose business involves real estate-related transactions to discriminate against any person in making available a transaction, or in the terms and conditions of a transaction, because of specified personal characteristics.

This bill would make it unlawful for any person or other entity whose business includes performing appraisals of residential real property to discriminate against any person in making available those services, or in the performance of those services, because of race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, familial status, source of income, disability, genetic information, veteran or military status, or national origin."

Link to actual bill below.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB948

This bill appears to be a political response to a couple of California media articles about alleged bias in real estate appraising. One article was about Cora Robinson who filed a complaint. Based on my research the first appraisal was within the range of market value. I did a FOIA request to get a copy of the investigation results and will post them here when they are available. Another article was about Saleem Shaheed. This was another case where the first appraisal was within the range of market value. Shaheed did not file a complaint. 

September 21, 2021 Marcia Fudge the head of HUD stated that there were few complaints for racial bias in appraising. I looked at the HUD stats and agree. A lot of the outrage in the media is from a handful, about five actually, alleged cases of alleged low appraisals caused by alleged racial bias. I researched the five cases and wrote articles in this blog about them. The first appraisals were within the range of market value. They were not low. The markets were quickly appreciating. The second appraisals came in over market value because the second appraiser used comps outside of the area which were not true comparables. I will be posting the results of the FOIA requests of the two complaints filed here.

A lot of these recent claims of alleged racial bias stem from the change in political climate related to George Floyd. "The country is in a time of racial reckoning, heightened by a summer of protests against systemic racism and police brutality following the death of George Floyd in police custody." Floyd's death "sparked the largest racial justice protests in the United States since the Civil Rights Movement." "According to data from various sources, the Black Lives Matter movement is now the largest movement in US history." While racism exists and must be banished from our nation the pendulum has now swung to the extreme side. In this new light anything and everything is automatically "racist" today before even looking at the facts.

It light of everything that is currently happening I believe real estate professionals need to educate their clients and the public about the real estate appraisal, lending and selling processes. Generally the person reading the appraisal report is not the client. The client is the AMC and the lender. The report is made for real estate professionals and not lay people. I think it's a good idea for appraisers to add language for lay people who will probably end up reading the report. Some of the complaints about reports that I've read clearly show that the reader doesn't understand market value or the underwriting process. I believe this has caused some to assume that any value they don't like must be "racism" when it's not. 

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

Monday, September 27, 2021

Fannie Mae - Racial Bias in Appraisals - by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser, Los Angeles, California

fanniemae survey racial bias in appraisals, real estate appraiser, fannie mae, freddie mac, racial bias, discrimination, survey, fha, home loan, diversity

Fannie Mae just had a survey for appraisers about racial bias in appraising. Oddly enough I didn't receive an email or notice about it even though I'm on the list. Thankfully appraisers are sharing the survey. It'd be nice if the appraiser organizations would also share the survey besides the government notifying interested parties. 

I think a survey is a good start. While there is currently a lot of talk about bias in appraising in the media I don't believe there is actually that much bias in appraising. It's a math formula based on numbers. At least a couple of software programs and then a few different people review each appraisal. The lenders, AMCs want the deal to go through. If they thought the appraiser was biased and killing their deals, they'd end up on the do not use lists and never be used again. 

There is a lot of talk about bias in the media. The three main media stories about racial bias have been false. I did a FOIA request to get a copy of the investigation results of two of the cases in which people filed complaints. One didn't file a complaint. I'm still waiting for results. HUD makes it difficult by forcing you to file a new FOIA every 30 days because the investigation isn't complete. All other government departments only make you file one. They give you the results of the investigation when it's over. 

Below are some of the questions. I am including my answers to the two free form questions at the end.








Question: "What can appraisers do to decrease racial bias in appraisals and incidents that increase reputational risk for the profession?" 

(My response is to the second part of the question) "Appraisers should explain appraisal theory, methodology, comparable search, comparable adjustments, comparison of the subject to the comparables, why specific comparables were chosen over others, comments and overall report better for lay people buyers, sellers who will read it even though they are not the client. This is important because they are the ones who complain, file complaints and tell the media their generally mistaken interpretation of the report i.e. any value which doesn't meet their expectation "must be racial bias." Fannie Mae could add a form for lay people so they can properly understand, interpret the report and know how to properly request a reconsideration of value if merited."

Question: "What can Fannie Mae do to decrease racial bias in appraisals?" 

Answer: "While I agree racism and racial bias exist I don't feel it's a major issue in appraising today. Buyers, sellers, agents are upset that appraisal values aren't meeting contract price which is currently higher that market value due to lack of inventory and low interest rates. People refinancing are upset that values aren't meeting their false high perceptions of value of their home. Fannie Mae can help reduce the false perception of mass racial bias with buyer, seller, agent education about appraisal theory, process, reports and how to submit merited reconsideration of value requests."

I personally feel that there are some people that will take some rejections and automatically assume bias because they've been discriminated against in the past. Some of these people need education about appraisals and valuations. Three appraisers can appraise the same property and come up with three different numbers. The variation should be slight if we're talking average sized tract homes, condos in areas with median prices homes, a sufficient turnover rate, home supply and a median density. There will be more variation on the extreme ends of value. Even Zillow admits this with their algorithms. That's why they don't give a Zestimate for homes above or below a certain price range. They also don't give Zestimates in areas of lower priced homes because their formula is not as accurate with limited data, older homes and homes in inferior condition. This is per Zillow themselves. Corelogic has a similar statement about their estimates. 

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

Thursday, August 19, 2021

Alleged discrimination in real estate appraisal 10222 Elmfield, Loveland, Ohio, Aaron and Erica Parker, by Mary Cummins

erica parker, 10222 elmfield, loveland, ohio, aaron parker, mary cummins, discrimination, racism, black, white, real estate appraisal, real estate appraiser, real estate, contract price, false, misleading, amy goodman
erica parker, 10222 elmfield, loveland, ohio, aaron parker, mary cummins, discrimination, racism, black, white, real estate appraisal, real estate appraiser, real estate, contract price, false, misleading, amy goodman, 



Here is another case of alleged discrimination in a real estate appraisal. The owners posted their full names, home location, appraisal values, list and sale prices so I will also share it. 

Aaron and Erica Parker owned a home located at 10222 Elmfield Dr, Loveland, Ohio 45140. They purchased it April 9, 2014 for $371,978. Per the MLS it was listed for sale April 13, 2021 for $525,000 by Amy Goodman of the Sibcy Cline real estate office MLS #1696320. Amy Goodman claims she is the "Fair Housing Officer" for Sibcy Cline real estate. She is not an Officer and not a Fair Housing Officer for the FHA or HUD but merely using that title most likely to promote her business. 

Allegedly Aaron and Erica Parker listed the home for $525,000 then instantly agreed to accept about $504,000 for the property. I assume they still paid the commission to Amy Goodman even though she didn't market or show the property. Erica stated after they got the instant offer she was "ecstatic" and “We were high-fiving each other,” “We were texting our Realtor, like, ‘Can you believe it?’”

Allegedly the first appraisal on May 5, 2021 came in at $465,000 which they said was $42,500 below the contract price. We can do math so contract was $507,500. At first their agent asked them if they would reduce the price. Parkers said no. Is this agent working for the Parkers or is she friends with the buyers giving them this pocket listing without any other bidders?

Per the article. "Goodman and the Parkers asked the appraiser and the buyers’ lender to correct the errors in the report. The appraiser refused, they said, saying he stood by his analysis. The lender had a staff member review the appraiser’s work and stood by the total, too." 

Based on my experience if someone submits a reconsideration of value i.e., an appraisal appeal, with similar higher priced comps and it has merit, the appraiser, AMC, lender will adjust the value. That didn't happen. I'm assuming there was no merit.

For no reason the sellers automatically assumed it was racism per the article. They decided to remove all traces of their skin color from the home and request another appraisal. The article states they "erased blackness from their home." Erica called it "white washing." May 20, 2021 the second appraisal came in at $557,000. They were happy. They assumed the higher appraisal was caused by their skin color washing. Then they sold their house June 11, 2021 for $507,500. 

First, some questions. If they thought it was worth $557,000, why the hell did they sell it for $507,500? That means they agreed to sell it for $50,000 less than it was allegedly worth. Was their real estate agent scamming them by listing it low and selling it as a pocket listing? They allowed a few people and two appraisers to view their home. Why not put it on the market and just not do open houses? No one is doing open houses today anyway. They could have sold it within a week in this market with a few private showings all in one day while they're out. There were photos from the last 2014 sale still online. 

As usual there is more to this story than the poorly researched and misleading media article trying to stoke the flames of racism. While I don't usually support robot appraisals I'm going to post some robot appraisal values for this home. This way no one can claim racism as the values are not from live people. They don't see the home, homeowners or anything because they're just a math formula. I am not appraising this property. Robots provided this value estimate. Below are the robot appraisal values for this home as of today, August 19, 2021. The home was appraised in May and sold in June over two months ago in a quickly appreciating market. Values range from $461,000 to $523,000, $497,000 mean/average, $502,000 median. 

Zillow $523,000
Realtor $504,000
Redfn $501,002
Trulia $507,500 
Remax $487,800
USDA Properties $502,800
Spokeo $461,000

Below is a chart from Redfn which tracks their estimates in the past for this home. Based on statistics average home in Ohio appreciated over 11% last year. That's about 1% a month. That means the original appraisal was in line with market value at the time. The second appraisal is clearly too high. At least Aaron and Erica Parker don't have to worry that they sold their home for less than it's real market value. 

erica parker, 10222 elmfield, loveland, ohio, aaron parker, mary cummins, discrimination, racism, black, white, real estate appraisal, real estate appraiser, real estate, contract price, false, misleading, amy goodman
erica parker, 10222 elmfield, loveland, ohio, aaron parker, mary cummins, discrimination, racism, black, white, real estate appraisal, real estate appraiser, real estate, contract price, false, misleading, amy goodman

Below is the listing history for the property. Aaron and Erica Parker had been trying to sell their home for a long time with no takers. They clearly listed it too high for the market each time. They even reduced the price twice. 

04/13/2021 $525,000 Pending Cincy MLS #1696320

04/13/2021 $525,000 Listed For Sale Cincy MLS #1696320

03/04/2020 $465,000 ListingRemoved Agent Provided

01/02/2020 $465,000 PriceChange Agent Provided

11/13/2019 $468,500 PriceChange Agent Provided

11/08/2019 $470,000 PriceChange Agent Provided

11/05/2019 $475,000 Listed For Sale Agent Provided

04/09/2014 $371,978 Sold

Here is my take on the situation. Real estate appraisers are limited by the highest recent similar sold home price. Perhaps a nearby similar home sold around $465,000 before May 5, 2021. While the home is on a cul-de-sac it backs up to a major road with a double line. Not good for families with children besides being a nuisance. 

It's possible that another similar home sold after May 5 but before May 27, 2021 for $557,000. Based on the sales I'm seeing that doesn't seem possible. I will bet that a home which was not similar sold for $557,000. The appraiser used a comp outside of the immediate area or it was larger, had more bedrooms, more full baths, more garages, more land and was fully upgraded. Erica Parker claims her home was upgraded. We don't know but the appraisal allegedly said it was not. Maintenance items such as new paint, new same style roof, replacement AC...are not upgrades. Upgrades would be adding a pool, an addition to the home... 

It's possible Erica was talking about "updates." That only has to do with the kitchen and bathrooms. They bought the home new in 2014. It shouldn't really need any updates in just seven years unless it was a poorly made cheap development. In the appraisal it's page one, "Improvement" section near the bottom. These forms are made for appraisers, lenders, underwriters and not lay people to read or understand. What the layperson does not see is the drop down menu which clearly shows it's only about kitchen, bathrooms updates. An "update" would be new or remodeled kitchen or baths. Below is an image which shows the form with the drop down menu exposed. All the viewer sees is the resultant text in the yellow highlighted box which generally says "no updates within the prior 15 years" or maybe "updated" "remodeled" "within 'x' to 'x' years." Complain to the government who made these forms. Click to see larger. 

real estate appraisal, how to read, updates, condition of improvements, upgrades, form, no updates, condition, property, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, complaint,
real estate appraisal, how to read, updates, condition of improvements, upgrades, updated, remodeled, form, no updates, condition, property, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, complaint, 


In another case a  black woman asked for a second appraisal when she didn't like the first one. She didn't remove any evidence of her skin color. The second appraisal still came in higher for other reasons namely the passage of time in a quickly appreciating market. Removing evidence of skin color is not what caused the increase in appraisal value here. I will bet the second appraiser used comps that were not similar but superior to the subject property. 

Another thing to note is that Erica Parker has a history of calling out people and businesses online. She complains on Twitter about businesses. Then she posts the freebies she gets from those businesses in response to her complaints on her Twitter account. The real estate agent Amy Goodman falsely claims she's a "Fair Housing Officer" because she attended a luncheon where someone spoke about housing discrimination. It appears Amy Goodman is promoting this story in order to drum up real estate business acting like she helped her black client deal with discrimination. She clearly didn't because she sold the home for $507,500 when it was "allegedly" worth $557,000. 

My biggest issue with this misleading article is the fake research they cite. Andre Perry, Michael Neal's research does not show that real estate appraisers appraise the homes of black people for less than the homes of white people regardless of all other factors. Andre Perry used Zillow estimates which were made by robots and homeowners guesstimates of value of their own homes. Michael Neal used the same. Neal stated that the robot appraisal values had the same amount of error variance for both white and black areas. No live person or real estate appraiser appraised any of the properties in the research. The only thing the data showed was that people of color generally make and have less money than white people. This is a fact based on real research. For this reason in general they buy and own homes in less expensive areas which they can afford. 

It's extremely reckless for the media to promote these false and misleading narratives and articles. The definition of racism is "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group." Assuming all white real estate appraisers are racist is actually racism. We use the same math formula to appraise homes as the robot appraisers which are clearly not racist because they aren't even people. 

In this quickly appreciating market some appraisals fall below contract price. Agents know this so they have added appraisal clauses. Here is an article about the current change in political climate which is causing people to call real estate appraisers "racist" when their appraisal doesn't match the contract price. It's not about racism but data and numbers. Actual racism is a horrible evil which should be banished from our communities. Making up false claims of racism when there is real racism out there to fight just divides and harms the community. 

Original article.

https://www.wcpo.com/news/our-community/this-black-familys-home-appraisal-grew-by-92-000-after-they-removed-all-signs-of-their-race

*I am not and did not appraise this property. I contacted the original author of the article and she never replied.

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

Friday, August 6, 2021

First Interagency Task Force Meeting on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) - PROBLEMS, by Mary Cummins

pave task force, hud, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, bias, discrimination, value, valuation, loans, fha, joe biden, white house, marsha fudge, meeting
pave task force, hud, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, bias, discrimination, value, valuation, loans, fha, joe biden, white house, marsha fudge, meeting

The first White House Interagency Task Force Meeting on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) was August 5, 2021. "Task Force members discussed how current appraisal practices are a significant contributor to the disparity in housing values. The practice of comparing properties within similar neighborhoods can be a proxy for racial demographics, which leads to the perpetuation and exacerbation of the legacy of segregation and redlining."

Racism exists. We should do everything we can to fight it. I fully support helping people of color  buy and maintain homes. I've studied segregation, redlining and their effects on community. That said doing away with the main valuation method of assets used around the world would be ridiculous and destroy the economy and our government.

Matched pairs analysis is how ALL assets in the world have been valued since the beginning of civilization. It's how all real and personal property are valued, traded, insured, assessed for taxation purposes, bought, sold, used for loan collateral, used as a basis to settle court disputes... The government is the one who mandated that real estate appraisers compare like to most similar like. It's also called the sales comparison approach. 

The purpose of the sales comparison approach using matched pairs analysis is to provide the "most accurate scientific measure of value." "The major supposition of the sales comparison approach is that market value of the subject is related to comparable property values within the same market area." This is how real estate agents and sellers determine a list price for a property. It's also how agents and buyers determine an offer price for the property. This is how the tax assessor assesses your property for taxation purposes. The sales comparison approach is the most accurate method to value homes for many purposes.

Based on what has been said by the Task Force members so far I am betting that they want appraisers to use only HIGHER sold comparables from areas with more valuable homes to appraise lower valued homes in areas with a higher percentage of POC. I am assuming this will only be for government and government insured appraisals, loans for POC but am not certain if it will be for everyone in certain areas of lower valued homes. Private banks and lenders would never go for this. Everyone knows the value of property is based on three main things, location, location, location. There are clearly major problems with this approach.

The actual value of property. "The fair market value is the price a home would sell for on the open market under normal conditions." Even if the government forces appraisers to use sold comparables from homes in Beverly Hills to appraise homes in East Los Angeles that will never fool home buyers or sellers. If you want to buy, can afford to buy a $100,000 home, you will look at homes for sale around that price range in an area you like. You buy the home with $10,000 down. It appraises at $100,000 which is market value determined by an appraiser. You get sick, lose your job, sell your home or lose it in foreclosure. It sells for $100,000 and the $90,000 loan is paid off. 

Let's say instead you offered $100,000 on a home with $10,000 down payment but the appraiser said it was actually worth only $50,000. If you buy it for $50,000, you're okay. Instead you demand another appraisal using sold comps in a more valuable area maybe a beach front property to appraise a tear down shack in Pacoima. The next appraisal is $100,000. You again get sick...You couldn't sell it for more than $50,000 or were foreclosed upon. The bank just lost $40,000 which you now owe to the bank even though you have no home. Many of these loans are backed by the government. The government aka the taxpayer loses that money. The banks and government are in trouble when this happens to many people like it did during the Great Recession of 2008. We are at a home price peak so this is a major concern.

I bring up this example because this would be mortgage fraud. The appraiser and lender would be complicit. This actually happened and people were criminally convicted of fraud. One such case was Victor Noval who defrauded the US Government HUD of $60,000,000 in this scheme. They used HUD money to buy property whose value was inflated by a con artist appraiser using higher sold comparables in other superior areas and other tricks. HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo stated in response to this crime in 1997 per the Los Angeles Times "Any con artist who tries to rip off HUD and the American taxpayer will be caught and prosecuted to the full extent of the law." The taxpayer ends up paying for any loss in government backed loans. Any program to artificially inflate the value of homes to secure government insured funding would be bank fraud and fraud against the government.  For the government itself to suggest these federal crimes is ludicrous! 

Another thing to consider is that lenders make the loans then sell them so they can use that money to make more loans. No one would buy the loans if there is no market value appraisal. No one would know what they are worth except less than the loan amount. They'd sell at a huge discount if they could be sold at all. Investors also bundle these bank and government insured loans as mortgage backed securities and sell them in the secondary market to pension funds, investment funds... Again, what are they worth? We have no idea because there is no appraisal of its real market value. Generally investors look at market value of the property, loan to value ratios, loan balances, rates, equity, payment history, loan delinquency rate ... to determine value of the investment. No one would invest in these loans if they have no idea what they are worth. That's money lost for new home loans. Now new home buyers can't buy homes. You just shot yourself in the foot.

Let's say investors invest in these loans anyway and the economy flounders. People are foreclosed upon and lose their homes which sell for less than the loan balances. The banks and government lose money on the loans. Homeowners still owe the balance of the unpaid loans. The mortgage backed securities also sell on the stock market causing the stock market to dump. This happened in the Great Recession when all those loans went south. The banks and Wall Street had to be bailed out. Government then had to develop new regulations to make sure this wouldn't happen again. Here's an idea. How about not starting new programs which set homeowners, banks, investors, taxpayers and the government up for failure from the start. 

What if POC in areas with mainly POC get a higher appraisal and then a larger loan using this new appraisal method? Do you raise their tax assessment value and taxes? That would raise the property taxes of neighbors pushing out poor and elderly people. Because home value correlates with home rent it would also raise corresponding rent of non owners who would have to move. Can wealthy people use this same new appraisal method to lower the value of their property to pay less property tax, give their spouse less in a divorce settlement or give the government less in capital gains taxes? What happens when POC get a bigger loan because of the higher appraisal but they can't afford to make the payments and lose their home? That happened during the Great Recession when home values appreciated quickly for real. While members of the Task Force stated POC would take that new make believe home equity money and invest in college educations, new businesses, health care, home improvement or retirement accounts to improve their financial situation and the community they invested in personal items instead. Our nation is still recovering from the Great Recession. This new appraisal method would open up an economic Pandora's Box while home prices and real home equity are already increasing rapidly. 

The Task Force has 180 days to come up with a real plan. I hope someone who knows something about real estate appraisal, investments, loans and the economy speaks up before then. If not, it's the home buyers, home owners, banks, government and taxpayers who will be hurt by this mess of an idea. 

#pavetaskforce #hud #realestateappraisal #bias #discrimination #value #valuation #homeloans #loans #fha #joebiden #whitehouse #marciafudge #meeting #August52021   #PropertyAppraisalandValuationEquity #PAVE #segregation #redlining #racial #occ #ftc #fdic #cfpb #fhfa #asc #susanrice 

The rest of the press release is below. It's also linked.

"The group identified near- and long-term opportunities to advance equity in home appraisals that will help narrow the racial wealth gap and reinvest in communities that have been historically left behind. The Task Force Members will work together and consult with civil rights organizations, advocacy groups, industry, and philanthropic entities to drive change.

Additionally, Task Force members agreed that the scope of the Task Force will be to:

Ensure that government oversight and industry practice further valuation equity;

Combat valuation bias through educating the consumer and training the practitioner;

Ensure equity in valuation by making available high-quality data;

Create a comprehensive approach to combating valuation bias through enforcement and other efforts.

The Task Force is chaired by Secretary Fudge and Ambassador Rice, and includes cabinet-level leaders from executive departments and additional members from independent agencies. The Task Force will deliver a final action report within 180 days.

The Task Force membership is comprised of the following officials: (I added their names)

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (co-chair) Marcia Fudge

Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy (co-chair) Susan Rice

Director of the National Economic Council Brian Deese

Attorney General of the United States Merrick Garland

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack

Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh

Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona

Secretary of Veterans Affairs Denis McDonough

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Michael Hsu

Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell

Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Lina Khan

Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Jelena McWilliams

Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Todd M Harper

Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Dave Uejio

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Sandra L Thompson

Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) James Park

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/05/readout-of-the-first-interagency-task-force-meeting-on-property-appraisal-and-valuation-equity-pave

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Thursday, July 29, 2021

HUD Webinar - Advancing Equity in the Home Valuation Process - by Mary Cummins

advancing equity in the home valuation process, hud, mary cummins, real estate, appraiser, real estate appraiser, los angeles, california, fha
advancing equity in the home valuation process, hud, mary cummins, real estate, appraiser, real estate appraiser, los angeles, california, fha

Earlier today I attended the Zoom seminar on "Advancing Equity in the Home Valuation Process" by HUD. Speakers were Secretary of HUD Marcia Fudge, Melody Taylor, HUD Lisa Rice, Alanna McCargo, Zillow Dr. Svenja Gudell, Noerena Limon, Michael Neal and Andre Perry

Based on what I heard today none of these people understand appraisals or the appraisal process. At the end of the meeting they actually said "we need a regulatory federal government agency to oversee real estate appraisers." The federal government has overseen real estate appraisers since 1989 per the FIRREA Act over 30 years! Guess who is one of the departments that oversees appraisers? HUD! HUD also handles complaints against appraisers. Shocking these people don't know this basic fact. FDIC, FHFA, FRB, OCC, NCUA, CFPB are other federal government agencies that oversee appraisers. 

After the speakers spent the meeting stating over and over that all real estate appraisers are biased and have robbed POC of $150 billion (citing flawed and meaningless data by Andre Perry) the speakers said something pretty disturbing. They said "the problem is old white men" meaning old white male appraisers. They stated this opinion without any evidence whatsoever. That is the actual definition of bias. It's also racist besides hypocritical. 

Below are my notes from the meeting. Below that is the information from the meeting and link. I'll post the Zoom video when it's ready. I came in when Lisa Rice started at 11:20 a.m. PST. My comments are in ( )s. 

Lisa Rice LR: Appraisal bias has been around for decades. It's robbing $150 billion in equity from black people and POC. That's why we started the task force. (LR is quoting Andre Perry's misleading paper. No money was stolen from POC by real estate appraisers or anyone.) We want to close the racial home  ownership gap. The gap is now larger than before the FHA passed. Part of the reason is credit. Blacks have 13% of the wealth of whites. Latinos have 19%. Blacks earn less than whites. Blacks don't have as much home equity. (Obviously if you earn less money, you have less money to buy and own a home) White schools get more money. (Schools get most of their funding from property taxes which is based on home values in their county. White people generally make more money so they buy more expensive homes and pay more property tax which goes to schools). 

Latino and Black borrowers pay more in credit fees than whites. (Poor people of all colors pay more in fees). There is now climate injustice and de-greening for POC. It's 5-20 degrees hotter in the same city for POC than white. (This is caused by lack of trees, open space, gardens which is caused by higher housing density. I live in such an area and it's all Latinos. New York luxury high rise condos have the same problem.) People think something must be wrong with black people to suffer these things. The cause is an unfair system. 

We (Americans) took (stole) land from the Indians and gave it to certain (white) people only. The distribution was not fair to black people. It's not fair because of the laws and policies which shaped our system. (It was even more unfair to the Indians who had their land stolen)

(LR cited Andre Perry's false and misleading $156B of equity stolen from black people.) The task force is the right path to equitable outcomes in appraisal context for POC.

Moderator Alanna McCargo AM: (McCargo is an advisor to HUD Secretary Fudge). How we will attack appraiser bias issue and remove it. Appraiser bias is multi-pronged and systemic. Biden said "we will use federal levers to root out discrimination in appraisals and the home buying process." Appraisals represent value, pricing, equity, affordability. Welcome, panel.

Noerena Limon NL: I work for public policy for the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals. 

Svenja Gudel SG: I work for Zillow. We are involved in data driven insights and trends. 

Michael Neal MN: AVMs Automated Valuation Methods discriminate against black people. 

Andre Perry AP: I hear appraisers say "there's no discrimination or racism in appraising. We passed laws." All value is a social construct. "Affordable" is one of their code words. We must correct the markets. Appraisers under priced black owned homes by 23% or $48K per home in lost equity. (False. His paper has major statistical errors and is meaningless). That money could have been used by homeowners to buy a home in a better neighborhood (He actually said that! So black people don't want to own a home in their own neighborhood? They want to go to a "better" neighborhood? Yet he says their neighborhood is as good as a similar white neighborhood).

SG: I agree with AP (She said this repeatedly). At Zillow we want to empower consumers to find a new home. It's important to provide more data. We use AVMs to level the playing fields and address racism. Our policy can work with industry to address issues. 

MN: Home ownership. We must help blacks get a home and benefit from equity. Undervaluation. If an appraisal is low a home sale can fall through. The homeowner has lower equity. Home owners use equity to invest in themselves, home improvements. We're in a recession. POC are more vulnerable in economic downturns. 

NL: Home ownership is the number one way to build wealth. It's a way to pass on wealth to their family, improve their health, business. The wealth of homeowners is 80x that of black renters. Latino homeowners have 40x wealth of Latino renters. Urban growth will come from non white communities. Discrimination and bias have no room in the housing market.

AM: It's a complex situation with lot of stakeholders. 

AP: Appraisers feel attacked. They are not the only actor in variance of price. There are agents, lenders though appraisers are included in that. Appraisers say "we've done nothing wrong. I'm not breaking the law." That doesn't mean there shouldn't be standards so you don't lower values. Real estate appraisals used to keep blacks out of certain communities (Wrong. Real estate agents, lenders kept blacks and others out of certain communities. You wouldn't get an appraisal if you didn't already own a home or were allowed to apply for a loan in that area). Appraisers are self regulating which isn't right. (Wrong. The federal government oversees appraisers. People can complain to HUD and others.) Appraisers have the freedom to discriminate. In the price comparison approach they compare homes in area to another in the same area. If you only compare homes in a discriminated area to the same area, discrimination continues. There are multiple ways to arrive at value. We look across metropolitan areas instead of just the same neighborhood to get our values (for his paper which is a huge statistical error making his results misleading). 

Real estate appraisers are the gate keepers. Only a few people make the determination. They are 85% white, 75% male (Wrong. Those numbers came from a poll in the Appraisal Institute which doesn't represent appraisers as a whole). They have too much opportunity to express bias which permeates the practice. Only a few actors determine value.

SG: I agree with AP. Former redlined areas show lower home values today than non redlined areas (which doesn't have to do with race but property age, type, median income of owners/tenants...). It stays with us. Human bias is real. (But Zillow uses AVMs which don't use humans so explain that). 

More data is better but it must be clean and correct data. Models are only as good as data you feed them (Garbage in, garbage out). All of the major AVMs don't use demographic (racial) data and shouldn't. They should only look at the home, amenities. We use a broad base of comps from similar neighborhoods (No. They use comps from the same immediate neighborhood). 

MN: We looked at AVMs. We didn't find evidence of bias with AVMs. We didn't see AVMs undervalue in black neighborhoods. (Tell that to Andre Perry who stated the opposite). Appraisal waivers encourage AVMs. If it's humans introducing bias into the appraisal why not remove humans from the process. There is more AVM error in black neighborhoods. Overvaluing is also problem besides over correcting to the low side. If you over value, you set up an additional layer of instability for more vulnerable. We need to boost the underlying value of the community. 

AM: What about the great recession. 

NL: The recession wiped out wealth for Latinos. POC more likely to have FHA loan, lower down payment. They are losing bidding war to bigger down payment buyers. Appraisals take too long and charge rush fees.  

AP: Over valuing is rooted in exploitation. People wanted to make money (making loans to anyone.). Black and brown bore the brunt of failure. Dodd Frank Act to correct that. In the white community they agree on a price point with the appraiser. In black community, no. (That's false. We don't agree on a price point ahead of time. It's illegal.) The deals fall through more in black areas. Blacks are burdened by regulations. They (the federal government) should focus on helping only black, brown and not the aggregate. If you can correct for black, brown, you can correct for entire country. If you over correct, you cause more damage.

SG: The current frenzy. It's hard for anyone to value a home today. The "value" is whatever anyone is willing to pay for it. Human or AVM appraisal. It's hard to evaluate homes now. Incredibly difficult. 

NL: This is a supply, demand issue. We need more homes. 

MN: Blacks need more equity. How they lend that money is important for impact. Black banks. We need to make sure when the increase is home value doesn't come with gentrification (Gentrification is just the revitalization of an area). Property tax assessments. Blacks pay higher property taxes than whites. (Property tax based on county and state laws where the person lives, when they bought it, how much they paid and how much it's reassessed. These things affect everyone not just black people).

AP: What recourse does a homeowner have from a bad appraiser? We need to make data transparent for all.  GSEs have lots of data to develop AVMs. (online avms). It's holding black people back. White and brown who own homes in black areas. The value effect of blackness. It spreads across different races. (Exactly. That's because it doesn't have anything to do with color but income, assets, savings, credit, home sales. AP also talks about finding a way to give the $48,000 in "stolen equity" to each black person. What about the others also suffering from the "value of blackness?")

SG: We care about data. Zillow was the first to make the data available and transparent. In 2002 you had to go to a real estate agent to find homes to buy. Consumers had no power. We give data for buyers and sellers. We give data to level the playing field. Data is powerful to shine a light on issues and provide better outcomes."

MN: We looked at AVMs. The magnitude of error is larger in black areas. The algorithm clearly "knows" the race of neighborhood. (Just because prices are lower doesn't mean it's a black neighborhood. Prices are low where I live and it's 90% Latino). Human appraisers can see the color of the people but not the computer model yet it did. (This proves it's not about color but income, assets, home values) 

SG: With data comes responsibility. The confidence range around the point estimate. It's harder to be more specific on tail ends (of the curve). We need to know if they've  been renovated... (She's referring to more error in certain areas with lower priced homes responding to MN).

AM: Maybe we should use the market value range concept for appraisers with a margin of error instead of point in time. We need to know the consequences of setting the value differently, how it would work for lenders. (They would say no. A USPAP compliant appraisal is needed for government to guarantee a loan. It's also needed so lenders can sell the loan and investors can buy, trade them.)

AP: I would like to ease the tension of appraisers out there. Data is not taking your job. Appraisers' inability to come up with accurate assessments is more of the problem. I used to have a problem (cabbies discriminated against him because he's black) getting a cab in certain areas in the Bronx. Technology, innovation evolved because of that problem. (You still can't get an Uber in certain areas of the Bronx no matter your color). There have been no research reports but reports anecdotal in nature in media coming out about appraisers discriminating against black people. (So far those specific reports have been proven wrong. ALL people having issues with appraisals in the last year because of the huge run up in sale prices, values. It's an every color issue.). There is a problem. I'm more concerned with low appraisals. If the appraised value comes in below the AVM it should trigger a second appraisal (I'm sure the buyer would love the extra cost. Then they have to deal with another appraiser.).  

SG: AVMs have limitations. Sometimes you need someone to walk through a property so there's no second guessing. 

NL: We need diversity in the appraisal industry to better understand the communities they serve. 

AM: The problem is old white men appraisers. (Everyone else, YES). It's tough to find an apprentice (She meant mentor) to train new appraisers. You need to look like the community you serve. How many real estate appraisers have been convicted of the crime of discrimination? (Discrimination is not a crime as far as I know. If it were, 80% of the nation would be in prison right now).

AP: It's the lender. The lender will say it's the appraisal. There is no accountability. We need clean lines of accountability. HUD is supposed to help detect discrimination. 90% of HUD complaints refused. It's not a criminal activity...yet! There are wild appraisal "errors" that negatively impact some groups more than others. 

MN: The lack of home supply. We should fix vacant homes to make them livable. Nonprofits should build homes. Homeowners of color live in inadequate housing. (Poor people of all colors live in inadequate housing). We need to renovate their homes for them. 

NL: Appraisal waivers are a higher risk event. How do we speed up the process?

SG: New homes are priced at a higher level. It's expensive to build new homes. It's difficult to build affordable housing. We need to fund the gap to repair housing to increase supply by tax credits. (Gov already offers that).

AM: Housing is infrastructure. We need to build it. (Public housing has always been a failure because of gov red tape, administrative costs...). Would a national standard for appraisers work? (We already have national standards!) 

AP: The Appraisal Institute makes standards. Individuals should review their standards and express their voice. (The Appraisal Institute is a private organization and not the government. They don't make any standards. The standards are made by the federal and state governments. In 1989 FIRREA established the Appraisal Foundation and the  Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC). The  Foundation’s Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) sets the minimum Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) develops the generally accepted standards of practice for the appraisal profession (the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice). These are reviewed every two years. Everyone can comment! I posted an image of the federal control of appraisers below).

SG: We should be more transparent and have a national database of home sales.

MN: Government should step in to fix the issues. The federal government probably needs to step in and oversee appraisers.  (Everyone replied, "YES, the federal government should oversee appraisers!") (They already do! See above. These people are clearly not experts.)

AM: (12:47 pm)There are 550 people here. 

END

Here is my solution to the financial problem. Help everyone get a good paying job so they can save money to buy or rent a home if they like. Don't go blaming others for a problem that doesn't really exist and is not their fault. Appraising is a math formula whether you're an AVM or a live person. One speaker even said he saw no difference between the live person and the AVM robot. Even Zillow said it's very difficult to appraise in this skyrocketing market. EVERYONE thinks the appraisal came in low if it's lower than the contract. Racism does exist and it harms people and communities. Trying to find racism in a math formula and appraising makes no sense. The government's energy would be better spent fighting major issues of real racism in the every day world. 

https://www.huduser.gov/portal/event/quarterlyupdate-July2021.html

"Homeownership is integral to building household and intergenerational wealth. However, bias in the home valuation process – including human bias, algorithmic bias, and lender redlining – hinders wealth creation and contributes to racial wealth disparities in the United States.

On July 29, 2021, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will host an event to discuss how bias in the home valuation process and the lack of diversity in the appraisal industry overall contributes to racial wealth disparities. HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research will host this event which will be opened by HUD Secretary Marcia L. Fudge who will discuss President Biden’s recent charge to HUD to lead a new Interagency Task Force on Property Assessment Valuation Equity, or PAVE. An expert panel will reflect on home appraisal bias and the related but distinct systematic devaluation of homes in minority neighborhoods, delving into topics including the potential for automated valuation models to help identify appraisal bias, Fair Housing implications, and the interagency governmental intersections of this issue that PAVE will explore. Please join our diverse group of experts from research, industry, and government for this PD&R Quarterly Update.

Opening Remarks

  • Secretary Marcia L. Fudge, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

PAVE Interagency Task Force Overview

  • Melody Taylor, PAVE Executive Director; Regional Director, HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity

Keynote Speaker

  • Lisa Rice, President and CEO, National Fair Housing Alliance

Discussion: How Racial Bias in the Home Valuation Process Contributes to Racial Wealth Disparities in the United States

  • Alanna McCargo, Senior Advisor, Housing Finance, Office of the HUD Secretary – Moderator
  • Svenja Gudell, Chief Economist, Zillow Group
  • Noerena Limón, Senior Vice President, Public Policy and Industry Relations, National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals
  • Michael Neal, Senior Research Associate, Urban Institute
  • Andre M. Perry, Senior Fellow, Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program "



Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Monday, July 26, 2021

Racial discrimination alleged by Cora Robinson in real estate appraisal 5924 Martin Luther King, Oakland, California - by Mary Cummins

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins

05/13/2024 The names of the appraisers are different. The Cora Robinson case appraiser T.K. is different than the one in the current press release M.U..Was there yet another appraiser? I'm not sure this is the same case now though everything else matches. MU is a real appraiser in that area and not an AKA.I will do State Information Act Request to California Civil Rights Department to get more information about the case which was just settled. Someone said the settled case was in Allendale census tract 4070 which has 6,200 people and is .3 mi sq.. This is a mainly Latino area with equal parts white, black, Asian. The press release by FHANC is not accurate. THEY provided the census and percentages. I made the PRA request.

05/12/2024 Someone just told me this is the same case. Same reporter. Same private Fair Housing organization. Similar values. Same city. Same senior black woman single mother. I'll try to find out more. If this is the same case, I believe the first appraisal. This is a revitalizing area. Values vary widely based on specific location and condition, upgrades of homes. Owner stated it needed major repairs. It needed to be fully renovated. It probably needed $200,000 worth of work and it's in an area that sells for less than the comps the second appraiser used.

https://abc7news.com/post/oakland-homeowner-settles-with-appraiser-mortgage-lender-after-300-000-lowball-appraisal-in-2021/14790837/

Press release from the private housing nonprofit. They give the owner a nom de plum but name the appraiser and not the AMC or lender. Clearly lender, AMC gave any settlement money if there was any. They shouldn't have given a penny. I believe the plaintiff Ms Trent aka Cora Robinson is flat out in the wrong. Cora Robinson used the media and a private group to shake down the lender. 

https://www.fairhousingnorcal.org/press-releases-and-statements/discrimination-complaint-alleging-race-discrimination-in-home-appraisal-process-settled-with-appraiser

01/04/2022 UPDATE: Based on a response to my FOIA response from HUD I believe the discrimination complaint filed with HUD was dismissed. HUD has not given an official answer though the investigation is over. They did previously force me to refile in order to extend the time to reply. HUD is fighting these FOIA requests forcing appeals. Because Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California didn't release any news saying they won the case it appears they lost. This was just another fake, frivolous discrimination complaint filed against an appraiser promoting the false narrative that appraisers are racists who low ball black home borrowers. 

ORIGINAL: Julian Glover just covered another story of alleged racial discrimination in a real estate appraisal in Oakland, California. After he ran his first story I contacted him via email and Twitter. Julian Glover never replied. 

The owner of the home is Cora Marie Robinson. The home in question which they specifically mention in their public report is 5924 Martin Luther King, Oakland, California. The address is also public if you search for Cora Robinson's name. The author of the article included this information which is why I'm using it here. First, some facts.

5924 Martin Luther King Jr Way, Oakland, California 94609 is legally a 4 bed, 2 bath, 1.5 story home built 1885, 2,336 sf on 6,000 sf end lot. It's listed as last renovation 1940. I searched building and safety and see no permits for any upgrades or additions. The owners were in default in 2012, 2013. It appears one of them runs a hair salon called Your Locs out of one unit which I don't  believe is allowed per zoning. Please, no one report the business or unpermitted additional bedroom, bathroom. Times are tough enough. 

Zillow lists the home as 5 bed, 3 bath with a current AVM or automatic valuation method Zestimate of $1.2M, range $1M-$1.4M. RedFin estimates $1.1M. Trulia $1.2M. RealtyTrac estimates it as a 4 bed, 2 bath home at $1M. Realtor estimates it at $1.2M. CoreLogic refuses to give an AVM or RealValue because it hasn't sold in a long time and doesn't appear to have recent renovations. Their error variance is too high to give an estimate or even a guesstimate. 

Now for some allegations. July 2020 Cora Robinson said it appraised at $800K which would have been within the range of the AVMs at that time. Cora said Zillow was $1.3M at the time which is false. I'm glad she didn't white wash her home before the last appraisal. All appraisers saw the same exact home in the same condition. Oct 2020 appraisal came in at $825K. February 2021 it appraised at $1.2M. March 2021 she got a new 1st loan at $606K which is about 50% loan to value ratio which is a very low ratio. 

Cora states the property, area is not subject to rent control. Yes, it is. Just because she has a relative currently living there doesn't mean the next owner would be free of rent control. Cora states it's in the higher demand area of Rockridge. It's not. It's three neighborhoods south on the other side of the freeway. Cora states the appraiser made two appraisals. He made only one which he appears to have updated. Cora stated the "bad" appraiser used comps with "nearby homeless encampments, liquor stores, trash on the sidewalk, greater structural neglect and other markers of poverty." If you look at the satellite image of the subject property, that describes the subject's area exactly. There's a liquor store on the corner of Cora's block and a homeless camp one block away! Is this lady for real? She wanted the appraiser to use a $1.6M comp from Rockridge which is a mile north, north of the 24 fwy and a much better more expensive area. Cora said the "good" appraiser used comps "in all directions." We are supposed to use the best comps and not comps in "all directions." Cora thinks the appraiser should have only used higher comps located northwest of her home in the nicer "whiter" area of Rockridge. Cora literally said that the appraiser used comps in areas which have more black people i.e. "has a higher percentage of black residents" which Cora states has a negative effect on value. Who is the racist and biased one here?! Just to be clear Cora is black saying these negative things about black people and how they negatively affect property value. These are direct quotes from her actual written and sworn complaint! 

Cora received the home for free from her mother who received it for free from her grandmother. Cora states she was paying about 7 to 13% interest rate on her mortgage which she got in 2008 at the peak of then prices and interest rates. Everyone knows those loans were predatory. To be paying on that loan all those years is crazy. We're clearly dealing with someone who doesn't understand real estate or finance. She feels she should be paid the difference between that higher rate and her current rate. That is ridiculous. Cora agreed to the terms of the old mortgage. The lender is the one who refused the new loan. The main reason for loan refusal is the credit rating of the borrower. Cora states she is retiring which means refinancing again will be impossible. I believe an appraisal done by any appraiser at the earlier time would have been much lower than the current appraisal. You can't "sue" an appraiser for market value. No money was lost here. The appraiser also only works for the AMC and lender not the owner of the property. 

The home is an end lot on a very, very busy street with what appears to be a Metro train which then turns into a highway, see pic below of the subject property taken from across the Metro. 

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins


There are apartment buildings on the street, vacant lot, homeless camp, trash, liquor store. These things reflect negatively on the value. There are more regular lots than end lots which would skew the value higher for all duplexes in the area. I see current comparable sales at $800,000 to $1,500,000 with most $900,000 to $1,100,000. The sales at the lower end were end lots which have not been fully recently renovated. The sales at the higher end are regular lots away from traffic, apartment buildings which have been very recently fully renovated. These comps were given to me by robots. I don't have MLS for this area so I can't actively search it. No one can say I discriminated in my search for comparables as I didn't actively search beyond typing in the address. 

I just used a robot to do a default search for the property which is +/- 20% size within one mile radius. I only changed it to search for the previous 12 months. The comps I found for when it was appraised the first and second time were $755,000 and $850,000 which were right next to the subject, newer, larger and had more bedrooms, baths. The robot refused to search properties in Rockridge which is actually three communities and over a mile away. The more recent comps are $1.1M, $1.1M, $1.0M and $1.3M. I haven't seen the inside of the properties. They could have been and probably are full remodels. I saw some pics of the subject online. It's an old remodel which needs a full remodel. This claim is now officially busted. 

Below is the map from the search. Maybe this is what Cora means when she stated all the comps were in one direction in the first two appraisals. Most are in one direction even though I pulled a mile radius. Cora's area has commercial, retail, vacant lots, hospital... Maybe there are fewer duplexes in that area. See how far away Rockridge is from the subject, i.e. bottom right of the map. There are cute restaurants, shops, trendy grocery stores, nice parks in Rockridge. In North Oakland there aren't even any fast food chain stores. Fast food chain stores heavily research locations. A location without them has many negative issues. You can get food at the liquor store or the gas station in Cora's neighborhood. Look at the satellite image.

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins


Median sales price for a duplex this size in this area went from $900,000 to $1,200,000 within the last 12 months. That's a year from Cora Robinson's first appraisal. The property has gone up in value immensely between the time of the first and last appraisal. As I look at the chart it was about flat July 2020 to January 2021 then it went from $900,000 to $1,200,000. That's a 33% increase in value right there. The appreciation in this area has been skyrocketing because it's such an inexpensive area compared to other local areas. People who are priced out of the more expensive areas of Oakland are going to these less expensive areas. The duplexes selling for more have been recently fully renovated. I bet there are flippers buying run down properties and fixing them up for much higher resale which is driving a lot of the increase in value. The combination of flippers and people being priced out of more expensive areas has driven the explosion in value in this area. 

Based on the information about the subject property and the sold comparables I researched the first and second values could have been correct for that time. Based on the same a higher more recent appraised value would have been within the more recent range of values. It's also possible the more recent appraisal came in a little high per the real bed/bath count, location and condition of the subject. I have a feeling the appraiser will be cleared of wrong doing in this specific case. I did an information act request and will post the results when I receive them. They don't release them until after the investigation is finished. 

Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California released a press release stating they are helping Cora Robinson file a complaint to HUD. The complaint is an online form. She didn't need any help filling it out. It's easier than filling out a loan application. I personally feel this non-profit organization released this news for media attention to get donations. They should have hired a review appraiser to review the appraisals before submitting the complaint. They have most likely destroyed the reputation of the appraiser whose name they plastered all over their national press release, articles and media outreach.

Here is the press release from the FHANC.

 https://www.fairhousingnorcal.org/press-releases-and-statements/announcing-discrimination-complaints-filed-with-hud-allege-race-discrimination-in-home-appraisal-process

and the complaints

Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California Complaint 1
Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California Complaint 2
Robinson Complaint 1
Robinson Complaint 2 

FOIA request was made for all information related to the complaint. Results will be posted here. 

Based on my review of a few of these alleged cases of racism in appraising it appears some of these cases partly stem from the lay person not understanding the appraisal, appraisal process or appraised value. Because they don't understand everything, have experienced racism in the past in other ways, have seen the recent false and misleading news articles about racism in appraising they assume racism must be the cause of the value. People misunderstand situations and jump to the wrong conclusions every day. It would be great if people could first ask the appraiser, lender questions before assuming it was racism and attacking the appraiser, profession and all people of a different race/color. Assuming things about people of a specific race/color without evidence is actually the definition of racism. It's hypocritical for someone claiming racism to behave in a racist manner.

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit