Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California

Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California
WEBSITE       RESUME       CONTACT       FACEBOOK        LINKEDIN       

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Rancho Palos Verdes Homeowners Will be Offered Market Value for Homes in Landslide area by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser

fema, home buyout program, rancho palos verdes,landslide, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, real estate appraisal, home, grant, fema program,
fema, home buyout program, rancho palos verdes,landslide, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, real estate appraisal, home, grant, fema program,


Homeowners will be offered "fair market value" for homes. The price will be "determined by an appraisal that is based on the fair market value of the land on Dec. 1, 2022, prior to the acceleration of the landslide." If you don't agree with the city's appraisal value, contact us for a historical restrospective appraisal of your home for an affordable rate. The program will pay for the "Appraisals costs." #ranchopalosverdes #homebuyout #landslide #marycummins #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal

From the program: "A licensed appraiser hired by the City conducts these appraisals. Cal OES will hire a certified appraiser to review the methodologies used to calculate the value and prepare the appraisal report. If a resident would like to appeal this offer, they may hire their own licensed appraiser, out of pocket, to conduct an independent appraisal. This second appraisal will also be reviewed by the Cal OES review appraiser. "

The program will pay for "Appraisals costs" and other costs. See below.

We have years of experience doing appraisals for eminent domain for the Metro and other government agencies. We do the second appraisal for property owners don't agree with the city's offer. Metro pays for the second appraisal cost. Based on our experience with Metro and other government agencies, their offer is generally at the lower end of market value. Our clients received more money after a second appraisal was conducted.

More about the program:

Voluntary Property Buyout Program

On October 28, 2024, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) announced a $42 million voluntary buyout program for property owners in the Greater Portuguese Bend landslide area whose homes have been damaged or threatened by land movement. Established with funding from FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, the Voluntary Property Buyout Program is intended to help eligible homeowners relocate to safer areas by offering a fair market value for their properties based on pre-disaster appraisals. Properties acquired by the City through this program will be permanently converted to open space and deed-restricted, protecting the community from future redevelopment risks in these vulnerable areas.


An overview of the program guidelines and application process are detailed below. A PDF version is also available.


Property owners interested in applying for the buyout program must request a voluntary property inspection from the City by 5:30 p.m. on Monday, November 4 by e-mailing buildingsafety@rpvca.gov. Program applications are due to the City by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, November 8, 2024.


Download an application by clicking the button below. Complete the application form and email it to landmovement@rpvca.gov, or print and return it to City Hall by Monday, November 4 at 4:30 p.m. City Hall is located at 30940 Hawthorne Boulevard in Rancho Palos Verdes. Regular business hours are 7:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Monday-Thursday, and 7:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Friday.


Voluntary Property Buyout Program Application


Download and print or email your completed application (PDF). Open in Adobe Acrobat to use electronic signatures.

Introduction

Many cities across California and the country have utilized buyout assistance programs for their residents to rebuild their lives and create new memories in safer places.


This Voluntary Property Buyout Program (Program) has been developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) in partnership with the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (City) to enable property owners caused by the Greater Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex (Landslide) to relocate from the risk of imminent failure of land movement. Funding for this Program comes from FEMA through its Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). 


HMGP

Generally speaking, FEMA’s HMGP is funded whenever a federal disaster is declared by the President. Funding that becomes available through the HMGP can be applied to any city in a state for which a federal disaster is declared and is not limited to the affected City. 


FEMA is funding this Program in the amount of $42 million to the City based on the Federally declared California disaster for the winter storms that occurred between January 31 and February 9, 2024. Additional future Program cycles may become available to affected residents depending on whether a federal declared disaster occurs in California. In other words, this Program may not be considered a one-time opportunity and may be available in the future.  


How the Voluntary Property Buyout Program Works

This property acquisition program is just one of many programs being offered through FEMA’s HMGP.  In a Buyout Program, also known as an “acquisition” program, the city will work with residents, who are participating voluntarily and own an improved property with permitted residential structure(s) that has been damaged or is at imminent risk to be damaged by a natural hazard event. Through the Program, the City is able to buy property from affected individuals based on an appraisal of the fair market value at a predetermined date, acquire title, demolish the structure(s), and revert it to open space.  By law, upon closing, the property would be owned by the City and must forever remain open space land. At closing, the property will be deed restricted as open space in perpetuity and cannot be redeveloped, except for limited allowable conservation/open space uses that are approved by FEMA Region 9.  The City cannot sell it to private individuals or develop it in perpetuity.


FEMA does not buy houses directly from the property owners. This Program is a typical real estate transaction between a seller and buyer, with the City being the buyer. The Program is funded by FEMA who will pay 75% of all eligible expenses. For this Program, the remaining cost share of 25% must be borne by the seller (property owner) except for certain in-kind costs borne by the City. 


The Program is administered by Cal OES and directly overseen by the City. Homeowners do not apply directly to FEMA or Cal OES for a buyout, as they are not considered disaster assistance, but rather a grant under the HMGP. Mitigation grants are complementary programs to the disaster assistance programs and have their own rules and regulations.


Based on applications received from each interested property owner, the City will identify properties where buyouts make the most sense based on, but not limited to, the scope of existing structural damage as determined by the City’s Building Official through a property inspection, open space value, community needs, and FEMA program requirements. 


Program Steps 

Application Process

Property owners of interest with structures that are destroyed, damaged, or imminently at-risk must voluntarily fill out an application (attached) and submit it to the City no later than close of business (4:30 PM Pacific Time) November 8, 2024 to be considered eligible within this first round of the Program offering. 


Application Screening

The City and Cal OES will review all property applications received by the November 8, 2024 deadline to ensure that each property meets FEMA’s eligibility requirements and will pass cost-effectiveness, environmental and historic preservation reviews, as summarized below: 


Cost Effectiveness - Cost-effectiveness is determined by FEMA’s Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) methodology and determined via FEMA’s software toolkit. This is the hardest hurdle for most program applications to clear. Many sound proposals across the state do not meet this component and will then be removed from initial consideration.

Environmental and Historic Preservation - The environmental and historic preservation (EHP) review process is intended to ensure all program applications align with and meet all the provisions of the National Environmental Preservation Act (NEPA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and program-specific reviews. This compliance assessment process can take several months to complete and the city to receive FEMA approval.

Both of the BCA and EHP review processes may take many applications out of initial consideration. These strict reviews limit the properties that can be considered in the Program. 


Prioritization Criteria for Selecting Properties

The City along with Cal OES and FEMA must ensure that each application follows program rules/regulations and comply with BCA and EHP laws and guidance. Properties deemed eligible by FEMA for the Program will then proceed to the selection process. 


Minimum eligibility includes:


The property is not bank owned (mortgages do not constitute bank ownership for purposes of this Program). This Program does not apply to properties currently owned in title by a bank or other institutional financial institution through a foreclosure or other similar means;

The property has not sold since December 1, 2022 (based upon Los Angeles County Tax and/or parcel records; 

The property must be improved with a legally permitted structure(s) based on records on file with the City’s Building and Safety Division; and,

Applicants must be the legal owners of the improved structures according to the Assessor’s records and building permit records on file at the City’s Building and Safety Division.

A property will be selected by the City to proceed with escrow based on the following prioritization order:  


Properties with a structure that has been red-tagged by the City’s Building Official; 

Properties with a structure that has been yellow-tagged by the City’s Building Official; 

Properties with structures that are in imminent jeopardy of becoming red- or yellow-tagged due to their close proximity to land movement elements (i.e. fissures, grabens, sinkholes, etc.);

Properties that have been de-energized indefinitely; 

Properties that may benefit the City’s Landslide stabilization and winterization efforts as determined by the City’s Public Works Director; and,

Properties that contribute to the overall value of the adjacent Palos Verdes Nature Preserve as determined by the City’s Recreation and Parks Director.

Property owners that are interested in the provisions of this program are encouraged to request a voluntary inspection by the City’s Building Official no later than 5:30 p.m. on Monday, November 4, 2024.


Property Owner Notification

The City will notify, in writing, property owners that they have been selecting to proceed with escrow.


5.   Property Appraisals


The sale price offered to a resident is determined by an appraisal conducted by a licensed property appraiser. For most residents, you will be offered pre-incident fair market value based on December 1, 2022, before land movement accelerated due to the heavy precipitation associated with the atmospheric river storms. 


A licensed appraiser hired by the City conducts these appraisals. Cal OES will hire a certified appraiser to review the methodologies used to calculate the value and prepare the appraisal report. If a resident would like to appeal this offer, they may hire their own licensed appraiser, out of pocket, to conduct an independent appraisal. This second appraisal will also be reviewed by the Cal OES review appraiser. 


If there are mortgages or liens held against the property, the fair market value paid to the property owner will be decreased by this amount. In other words, all mortgage obligations or property liens will be retired first. 


FEMA Project Approval


 FEMA will notify Cal OES once all the submitted properties are deemed fully eligible and receive official approval. Once FEMA awards the grant funds for the buyout, Cal OES will work with the City on next steps. No construction or demolition activities may take place before FEMA approves the grant (excluding the City’s Landslide stabilization and winterization activities).


 


Release of Liability and Indemnification Agreement

Any property owner who accepts a buyout offer shall be required to sign a liability release and hold harmless/indemnification agreement. As a condition of acceptance, property owners must withdraw any claims for personal injury or property damage against the City in connection with the Landslide and in connection with all of the City’s activities and efforts related to the Landslide, and dismiss any lawsuit against the City on the basis of same. A property owner must also release the City from liability from any and all past or future claims or other actions in law or equity for any personal injury or property damage based on any of the City’s actions in connection with the Landslide, in perpetuity.


8.   Closing


Once a homeowner accepts a buyout offer, the average closing takes about 45 days. The City will conduct the purchase and title transfer.


Property Transition

Upon closing escrow, all property structures and improvements will be required to be demolished and the lot cleared for open space. Each parcel may be required to be regraded and restored so that it does not create a safety issue to the public.


Eligible Costs

If a property owner voluntary chooses to participate in this Program, FEMA’s grant funding will pay 75% of the total fair market value as established on December 1, 2022, the total fair market value will include the following:


Property value as established by licensed real-estate appraiser

Appraisals costs

Title search costs

Lot survey costs, if necessary

Real estate transaction fees

Closing costs

Demolition costs

Environmental/hazardous waste remediation (lead-based paint, asbestos, etc.) costs

Site restoration (grading, seeding) costs

Like any other real estate sale, property owners will be responsible for the moving costs and other costs associated with renting or buying new property. Since property acquisition relies on voluntary participation, the government does not pay any relocation costs. However, there are exceptions for any tenant who is displaced by an owner's decision to sell.


Voluntary Participation

This Program is strictly voluntary. Homeowners are not being forced to relinquish their property and the City will not use eminent domain to acquire a property. 


Voluntary Withdrawal

Property owners who have been selected to proceed with the purchase of their property may withdrawal at any time prior to closing. Once closing occurs, the real estate transaction is complete and final.


Landslide Stabilization and Winterization 

This Program is not intended to replace or suspend City efforts to stabilize the Landslide and implement winterization measures and activities. With or without participation in this Program, the City is committed to continuing with its stabilization and winterization activities and efforts.  


Timeline and Expectations

Despite efforts to compensate you fairly, property acquisition may not make you "whole" again, but it is often the best option for people who do not want to accept a certain level of risk in their day-to-day life and are at imminent risk of losing their home. 


Moreover, the process can be lengthy. Applying for funds, waiting for FEMA approval, transferring funds, conducting appraisals and closings, etc., take time. Even the easiest real estate transactions take months to complete under ideal circumstances. Adding Federal and State government processes may slow down the transaction; however, the amount of funding offered through this option is typically the highest property values available for residents living in hazard prone areas.


Duplication of Benefits

Because federal funds are used to acquire property, FEMA cannot duplicate the benefits paid by one program with benefits from another source. This means that FEMA will require the City to subtract from the purchase price the amount of other assistance the individual property owner might receive for the same purpose. This assistance includes grants that are available to individuals or insurance payouts. The $10,000 assistance payment through the Social Program provided by Supervisor Hahn to eligible residents in the area does NOT count as a federal duplication of benefit.


If the property owner received any insurance payouts to repair their home, they must show they used that funding to make the repairs before the closing, or else the fair market value will be lowered by this amount. In other words, if your structure was damaged, you cannot receive an insurance payout to repair the structure and a full pre-event fair market value at closing.


Non-Federal Cost Share (aka the “Match Contribution)

FEMA only provides 75% of the funding in the HMGP. To meet cost-sharing requirements for this FEMA grant program, property owners will contribute approximately the remaining 25% contribution for their property through an additional reduction of their fair market value payment. An amount will be reduced from the payment at closing and held in escrow to cover the balance of the remaining activities (e.g. demolition and site restoration). The property owner will receive any additional balance upon completion of site restoration during closeout.


Who to Contact with Questions

Inquiries on the Program should be emailed to landmovement@rpvca.gov.


Conclusion

This page is intended to ensure affected property owners get all the information they need about the Buyout Program so they can make an informed decision.

https://www.rpvca.gov/1782/Voluntary-Property-Buyout-Program


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

FHFA Allows Alternative Valuations with Higher LTV Ratios by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser Los Angeles California

mary cummins, real estate appraiser, los angeles, california, real estate appraisal, fhfa, ltv, avm, appraisal, real estate,low income, poc, great recession, foreclosure
mary cummins, real estate appraiser, los angeles, california, real estate appraisal, fhfa, ltv, avm, appraisal, real estate,low income, poc, great recession, foreclosure

The Federal Housing Finance Agency FHFA has expanded the eligibility for alternative appraisal methods on purchase loans by increasing the allowable maximum loan-to-value (LTV) requirements. The maximum LTV ratios will increase from 80% to 90% for appraisal waivers and from 80% to 97% for inspection-based appraisal waivers. 

“To be clear, the expanded eligibility of appraisal waivers does not constitute an expansion of a credit box, but rather it will allow more first-time home buyers, and particularly low- and moderate-income first-time homebuyers, to recognize the benefits associated with appraisal waivers,” Naa Awaa Tagoe, deputy director of the division of housing mission and goals at the FHFA, said on stage."

More purchase loans will not utilize a regular inspection appraisal by a licensed real estate appraiser. They will be using non-licensed non-appraiser property inspectors and AVMs Automated Valuation Methods similar to Zillow. This means lenders can use their AVMs, in house approval departments to get higher values so they can approve more loans so they can make more money. These loans will be riskier to new buyers, investors and the government. The housing industry players have been directly lobbying the government to do this for years now under the guise of helping lower income "save money" and fighting nonexistent "appraiser bias."

Never forget the Great Recession. Real estate prices were booming and fewer lower to mid-income, first time buyers could afford to buy a home. The people complained it was discrimination against lower income and POC. There is a correlation between lower income and POC. The correlation is based on socioeconomic factors and not race. There are also plenty of lower income non POC. 

The government stepped in to "help" by lowering credit and loan requirements. More lower income first time buyers were then able to buy a home at the peak of the market for almost no money down. They had very little to no savings and were spending most of their income on home expenses. They were set up for failure by the government while lenders made lots of money. Lenders support relaxing requirements so more will qualify so they can make more money. Lenders lobby the government to reduce requirements while saying they just want to help poor people. This actually helps wealthy people at the expense of poor people just like payday loans. 

The real estate bubble of course burst and those people ended up underwater. Low teaser rate loans adjusted, some had financial emergencies and they couldn't pay their sky high mortgage, insurance, property taxes and property maintenance. It was cheaper to rent than own. The real estate market collapsed and people lost their homes in foreclosure. They lost more than just the cost of the home due to associated costs and fees. The psychological effect on the families was devastating. Oddly enough the people and government blamed appraisers even though it was the fault of the government and the bubble bust real estate market driven by buyer demand. Appraisers just report the market. We don't set it.

Today we're in a similar though slightly different situation. We're in another real estate upswing caused by previous lower interest rates and severely restricted supply due to rate lock. Everyone wants to buy a home that will appreciate 50% like they have in the last few years. They are again complaining to the government that it's discrimination against lower income and POC because they can't afford to buy a home today.

People are blaming the government for the wealth gap which they say is mainly caused by the home ownership gap. The wealth gap is mainly caused by the income gap. Owning a home alone is not the cause of the wealth gap. You need to be able to first afford to buy and own a home by having higher income, more savings and good credit. Higher income, savings, good credit must come first otherwise you just saddle yourself with debt and higher monthly costs you can't afford. You'll lose your home if you have one financial emergency.

Government did the same thing with student loans. "If you get a college degree, you'll make more money. Here are loans so you can afford to go to college." You'll also end up with $100,000 high interest debt which make it impossible to pay bills, have children, start a business or save to own a home. The correlation between having a degree and higher income is related to first being able to afford to pay for and go to college. It's not the degree itself as many people have realized. Same with owning a home.

The government again responds by lowering loan requirements. Now you can put almost nothing down and get stuck with hefty mortgage payments, rising insurance costs, high property maintenance costs and rising property taxes at the top of the market. Property taxes, insurance increase as property value increases. Insurance costs are through the roof today due to natural disasters exacerbated by climate change. The appraisal waivers and use of value acceptance, AVMs make the loans even riskier for buyers and investors. It's even riskier today as we are at the peak of the market. Two to five years ago and it would have made a little sense. The government always reduces regulations at the peak of the market because of lack of affordability and politics.

AVMs will over value lower priced properties which are generally in inferior condition, inferior locations, smaller than average, have deferred maintenance, include buyer concessions for repairs/costs... These are the properties lower income people are buying because they can afford them because they cost less. The government is again setting these people up for failure. They always do this at the peak of the market. 

I was screaming from the rooftops about this issue before the Great Recession. I'm now screaming from the mountain tops. Nothing will change. The government is hurting the people they claim they want to help.The election year campaign promises to get votes is making it worse. You know they will again blame real estate appraisers for a downswing even though we didn't appraise the properties that are most likely to be foreclosed. It's déjà vu all over again. 

https://www.fhfa.gov/news/news-release/fhfa-announces-updates-to-enterprise-policies-on-appraisals-loan-repurchase-alternatives-and-pricing-notifications

November 1 Jeremy Bagott just wrote a good piece on this.

https://mailchi.mp/257006d81c5f/days-from-election-agencies-make-good-on-final-sop-to-housing-lobby-10896727


https://www.housingwire.com/articles/fhfa-to-allow-alternative-appraisal-methods-on-purchases-up-to-97-ltv/

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Monday, October 28, 2024

Appraising Homes with Solar Power Systems Class AjO by Mary Cummins


I just took the Solar PV: Technology and Valuation class offered for free by AjO Classes and sponsored by CA IOUs (California's Electric Investor Owned Utilities). It was very interesting and I learned a lot. They of course explained everything we should know about inspecting and appraising the value of a solar power systems. Then they went into using the three different approaches to value, i.e. sales comparison, cost and income. 

You need a bit of data in order to determine the value. That data isn't always readily available for the comp properties. You can use cost or income approach if there's isn't enough market data in your area. If you give most weight to sales comparison approach, cost and income data are only supportive so ...

In order to calculate the value of a solar power system (not solar thermal for heating water) you need to know if it's owned versus leased, power of the system size in kWh and age. Assume 25 year life. Leased systems add no value. You'll need to collect data such as contract with power size, original price, current price of similar new system and maybe power rates. There are free online calculators available. 

I'm pretty sure the solar people got together to try to help educate the agents and appraisers about the value of solar systems in home values. Most don't mention it or include data or value. This upsets sellers and solar companies. They want people to see the value in the systems. I was always taught to do regression analysis to see if there is a market reaction. Issue again is sufficient data. 

A few takeaways. You need a bit of data to appraise the value of a solar system. You need to know power, age of solar system of comps. As rates continue to rise the value of solar systems will increase. The cost of new solar systems has come down dramatically. If you depreciate an older system, it will probably be higher than buying new. Use the lower of the two values. People buy homes with solar systems for more than just energy cost savings. I highly recommend the class. 

"Appraisers and Realtors will advance their credibility and competency to better serve their clients with solar-powered homes.

Newly constructed homes have been required to have solar as of 2020 and existing home installations remain on an ongoing upward trend.

How much value does solar add?

What is the most essential number we need related to valuation?

While saving money is the primary motive for homeowners to invest in solar, CA building codes and energy policies are key market drivers as goals prioritize decarbonization; all-electric buildings powered by solar.

Attendees will be better equipped to represent solar assets accurately in sales, competently determine value, and be credible guides for buyers and sellers.

Course Highlights

The first question to ask about solar systems

The most important number to obtain related to valuation

How to determine value of solar PV: 3 appraisal approaches

Key points to include in listings and appraisal reports

How utility rates impact purchasing decisions and value

Components of solar systems and what to look for during inspections

Context: CA energy policy

Resilience: Solar plus storage to leverage TOU rates and power through extreme events

Future influencers: Evolving challenges in managing our power grid

Access to free online tools to inform and improve professionalism

Learning Objectives

Answer essential questions regarding the valuation of a solar system

Indentify components of solar systems

Be aware of variations in utility rates and their impact on value

Understand motives and market influencers of homeowner decisions

Determine the value of solar PV systems: 3 appraisal approaches

Accurately represent solar in listings including vital points to inform value

Stakeholder’s shared pool of knowledge to support fair valuations

Target Audience:

Real estate appraisers

Agents

Lenders

Related associates

Learning Level: Intermediate

*Course is designed for those familiar with valuation principles

Continuing Education Credits: 3 hours continuing ed. BREA, DRE, BOE "

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Saturday, October 12, 2024

Cause of Lack of Trees in South Los Angeles, Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser

I just read the LA Times article "Study reveals attitudes about lack of trees in South LA." FTR I live in South Los Angeles in an area that has both a lot of trees and no trees. I choose my walking route based on the streets that have trees that can provide me with sun protection and protection from the summer heat. I can feel the huge temperature difference when I walk the two blocks with no trees to get to the one block with trees. The areas in SLA with trees have nice well maintained homes. The areas without trees have less well maintained homes, apartments, commercial and industrial buildings.

My first issue with the article is it starts off with a very racist comment by an alleged community leader. It's as follows: "Our lack of trees is not an accident or coincidence. It is a result of historic patterns of discrimination, disenfranchisement and racist planning practices." This is false. There is a lot more to the history of South LA and trees. Yes, racism and discrimination exist in Los Angeles but there has never been a policy where no trees were planted in areas because of race.When you automatically accuse everyone of racism and discrimination they are less inclined to want to help. You are attacking the people from whom you are asking for help which makes no sense.

First some history. Originally this land belonged to Native Americans for tens of thousands of years. Later the Spaniards stole the land from the Native Americans calling it New Spain in 1542. Spain claimed the specific area of California in 1769 and Los Angeles was established in 1781. Mexico got their independence from Spain in 1810 and controlled the land. California became a nation in 1846 independent from Mexico. In 1850 California became a US state. California was a free state and didn't have slavery but did have Native Americans and Mexicans.

Southern California was mainly rolling hills with sage scrub and grassland. Most of South Los Angeles didn't have a lot of trees naturally. The area is mainly flat land. It was used for farming because it was flat with few trees. The few trees were near creeks and rivers or in the higher hills. We are in Sunset Climate Zones 18–24. Only very hardy small trees, shrubs grow in the flat areas naturally though we have larger oaks, sycamores, pine trees, fan palm trees... near areas with more water. We are not a forest but a drier desert area without a lot of natural trees.

Around 1880 they started building a lot of homes. Most developments cut down native plants, trees then planted a lot of non native trees around the homes and lining the streets on the parkways. Some still exist today but sadly trees don't live forever so many have died. Many trees were not good choices for our climate, drought conditions so they died. 

From 1880 to 1940 most of South LA was middle class to more affluent. Around 1900 some more expensive developments didn't allow blacks, Mexicans, Indians... The LA Sugar Hill case ended housing segregation in 1945. School segregation ended 1947. Fair Housing Act was 1968. This happened all over the entire US.

Starting around 1945 some people left South Los Angeles and moved to more affluent newer areas. The reasons are because the housing stock was getting older and dilapidated as most homes were built 1880-1920. It was caused partly by the real estate cycle of decline. People wanted to move to newer developments. It was also caused by scaremonger tactics from real estate investors who scared some white people causing "white flight." They were told their properties would be worth pennies once other people such as blacks lived near them. Property values went down and continued to go down as the area fell into disrepair which is called decline in real estate cycles. People weren't maintaining the homes or the trees.

As the property values went down making it more affordable the percentage of blacks, Latinos went up. There is a correlation between income and race. Whites make more money than blacks, Latinos. People who make more money have more money and buy more expensive homes in more expensive areas. This has nothing to do with the Planning Department. Over time more POC lived in these more affordable areas of South LA. Over time the population has become mainly Latino then white then black. LA City Census shows 64% Latino then white, black equally. It varies by poll type and specific area. Little Honduras is more Latino. 

Lower income people tend to live in cheaper smaller homes, duplexes and apartments. For this reason there is a higher density of people in lower income areas. Because of income correlation this means there are more blacks, Latinos in these areas. People buy what they can afford. There are also lots of poor whites here. This explains the people to tree ratio in the Times article. It's not racism but economics 101.

Some people, neighborhoods, cities, organizations would plant new trees as older ones died from age, bark beetles, drought, damage from utility line tree maintenance programs... Those are generally middle income areas and up in Los Angeles. Many times the homeowner, property owner planted a new tree to replace dead ones in front of their property. Legally property owners are responsible for maintaining the parkway and trees in front of their property. That is the little strip of land between the street and sidewalk. People are supposed to maintain the city trees on their parkway though the city will trim it. Many in lower income areas do not maintain the trees on the parkway. Most people are lower income tenants in these areas. Tenants don't maintain anything. Landlords don't live there and don't really care. Not as many are owner occupied homes. Property owners are the main reason there are no living trees on the parkways in those areas. 

Property taxes from specific areas generally pay for city repairs and improvements in those specific areas. These areas have lower values so they have less revenue from property and other taxes. They have less money in their budgets for tree planting. Generally politicians will pass new programs based on what the constituents want. They take polls. The people living in the areas wanted more police protection, general clean up, affordable housing, parks, school improvements... They did not want the few city dollars spent on new trees. It's what they wanted. Tenants and landlords vote equally.

After many years with no new trees planted and older ones dying there are fewer trees in South LA today. Some nonprofits and neighborhood organizations started fundraising to buy and plant trees in South LA. They planted some trees. Many were not watered or cared for and they died. Some were stolen. Others were vandalized. I've seen all of this first hand. I'd replant the ones ripped out by vagrants. I'd water some. I picked up two that were knocked over by cars, replanted and restaked them only for them to later be stolen. I saw someone load one in a truck but he had no license plate so I couldn't report it like that would have done anything anyway.

Some see new trees as a sign of "gentrification" so they destroy the trees which is crazy. Gentrification is just the real estate cycle of revitalization. It's been happening all over the world since the beginning of time. People get pushed out of more expensive areas so they move into adjacent areas which are more affordable. This causes home prices and rents to go up in those areas. Some existing tenants will have rent increases as the area improves. I've found in my area which is mainly Latino that more affluent Latinos are replacing less affluent Latinos. It has nothing to do with race or color but money. It's based solely on economics. In one case middle income Latinos moved into an area of lower income Latinos. The lower income Latinos broke windows, graffiti'd the businesses of the middle income Latinos because they didn't want their rent to rise. What really gets me is the lower income people who own the property are happy as hell to sell for 10x what they paid for it. It's only a few tenants who complain. Since the beginning of time people would just move to another area they can afford but today they protest and blame others and call people racists.

All that said we do need more trees in South Los Angeles and other areas with few trees. The City of Los Angeles has had tree planting programs called "City Trees," "Million Trees LA" for years. They give away free trees all the time. In 2006 the goal was to plan a million trees in a few years. It was not that successful because people didn't care for the trees and they died. They were also not the best trees. I saw one which was a purple potato vine bush pruned into a tree. They are ugly if you don't prune all the time and they provide no shade. I think the tree provider just wanted to make a lot of money off the city.

Any program for new trees must work with the community where they will be planted. People need to sponsor and volunteer to maintain the trees block by block. I can only handle the blocks I walk which is two miles a day. It should probably be a paid group of tree guardians which would also provide some jobs to locals. They need to talk to the homeowners and the homeless people living around the trees. The city, block club, tree group, community organization...can all work to plant and cultivate the trees but if homeless people, vagrants, others steal and destroy them, there will never be enough trees. As areas are revitalized there will be more successful tree plantings.

After I wrote this I took a walk in my area of SLA. I noticed trees were dead in front of apartment buildings, commercial buildings more than homes. Apartment and commercial building owners don't generally live at the property they own. They don't care about trees. They also probably don't realize it's their responsibility to maintain the parkway. No one enforces maintenance of the parkway or trees. One idea to aid in enforcement would be using Google maps street view. You can clearly see if there are trees just looking at the maps. They now even have green colored areas for trees on the maps. Sure Google would write a quick script to get addresses that don't have trees so notices about free trees could be sent with their property tax statements. Or maybe the city can instead of giving away free trees for people to plant on their private property they can go plant some on the parkways where they are missing. They will need to maintain them and should be drought tolerant, hardy and a type of tree people won't want to steal. No one waters the parkway in lower income areas. 

An education campaign about maintaining the parkway might help. Another idea would be to make it mandatory to have a tree of certain species on parkways every so many feet maybe 25'. Average lot is 50 wide so two trees in front of each house away from street signs, utility wires sounds good. One would just have to enforce the tree mandate. If someone doesn't plant or request to have a tree planted by the city or doesn't maintain a tree, they can be fined, have a fee added to their property tax. A professional organization can then be paid to plant and maintain trees. At the last house I owned I added a sprinkler system to my parkway. I also paid an arborist to give me advice to make my tree healthier. 

The problem with my idea is that lower income people will complain about having to pay a fine or do work to plant or maintain a tree. They will scream discrimination and blame it on the "racist" city. I have no faith that anything can be done because the people complaining about lack of trees don't want to do anything about it. They don't even want to maintain the parking strip which is their legal and financial responsibility. After following the tree issues for years I throw my hands in the air on this one.

Here is the LA Times link or you can read it for free via Yahoo news by searching the title. 

https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-10-11/there-is-no-easy-fix-study-reveals-attitudes-about-lack-of-trees-in-south-l-a


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Wednesday, October 2, 2024

Chicago Urban League, Chicago Association of Realtors, Preparing for An Appraisal, Comments by Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser



I attended Chicago Urban League, Chicago Association of Realtors Zoom webinar today on Preparing for an Appraisal. Good questions and answers. Below is the summary. My notes, comments below that. I'll post link to video if, when they release it.

"Preparing for An Appraisal.On October 2nd from 7:00-9:00 PM, join the Chicago Urban League's House and Wealth Committee for part one of a three-part virtual series. During the event, you will gain valuable insights into the appraisal process and learn how to advocate for fair valuations.

Learn from top experts in the real estate field on how to prepare for an appraisal and advocate for your property’s value. Whether you’re a Realtor, Realist, or a homeowner, this virtual event is packed with valuable insights.

Moderated by the Chicago Association of Realtors President Elect and Chair of the Chicago Urban League’s Housing and Wealth Committee, Lutalo McGee, our esteemed panelists include, 

President Sanina Jones of the Dearborn Realtist Board (DRB), 

President Erika Villegas of the Chicago Association of Realtors (CAR) and 

Tiffany Jimenez of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals (NAHREP) Chicago

Tom Schurer of Real Valuation Services 

This 3 part series represents a joint effort of the CUL, CAR, DRB, NAHREP, NHS, RAINBOW PUSH AND NAACP- South Side to empower real estate professionals and consumers about the appraisal process and how best to advocate for home buyers and sellers to ensure they receive a fair valuation based on industry best practices." 

Mary Cummins notes and comments on the meeting.

Question: Can I advocate for my value, for what I think it's worth? 

Answer: Panelists said yes. Some said you can offer comps, contract. Appraiser said "Nobody knows a home better than the homeowner. It's a matter of pride." 

Question: Why do consumers think they can't talk to the appraiser?

The panelists said you can and should talk to the appraiser about your value and what you think it's worth.

I sent in this comment: "Borrower can give comps, contract, list of improvements ....but can't try to influence the value. "1090.5. (a) No person with an interest in a real estate transaction involving an appraisal shall improperly influence or attempt to improperly influence, through coercion, extortion, or bribery, the development, reporting, result, or review of a real estate appraisal sought in connection with a mortgage loan." 

My comment: It's a crime and you will be denied your loan if the appraiser feels you tried to influence their value. Don't say "I need $xxx,000 to get the loan," "the house is easily worth $xxx,000." Feel free to give list of similar homes of the same size, condition which have recently sold in the same area. Don't state a dollar value for fear appraiser may think you are trying to influence. 

Question: Can I ask appraiser if they know the area, are competent?

Answer: Yes, but be nice and polite.

Question: Should I communicate with the appraiser in writing or on the phone?

Answer: Put things in writing so it will be included in the work file. Send it to them before the inspection. (My comment. Be polite and factual. Don't try to influence the dollar value).

Roberto Interiano, Lender, then read my comment and others agreed.

Question: Can I order my own appraisal if it doesn't have to do with a loan?

Yes, if you just want to know the value. The bank has to order their own appraiser for their appraisal for a loan.

Question: What should I have ready for the appraisal?

If you are selling, make sure your house is in show ready condition. Have any documents ready for inspection such as the survey, list of improvements. 

Question: Should I remove photos from my home?

Answer: Erika Villegas: Yes, remove religious and political items. Remove personal photos because the listing photos could end up on the internet. Remove photos of people because there have been media articles which show some didn't get the "proper value" because of photos of some people.

My comment: All real estate agents tell all sellers to remove personal items, clutter and make sure home is clean and presentable. This is especially important for listing photos, showings. There are a lot of media articles out there about people white/black washing their homes to remove any trace that the owner may be black, Latino... Some articles say the value went up because of, after white/black washing. That is probably not the cause of the value change. It's a false narrative caused by the media, politicians and others. 

Lutalo McGee: What about removing personal photos?

Sanina Ellisa Jones: An appraisal is subjective. It's problematic and why appraisals come in lower in our (POC) economy, community. It's because of racism, redlining, discrimination from early 1900's. The maps said risk is equal to blacks. African Americans were marked red, hazardous. It's no longer legal but still subjectivity exists from that practice. Take down religious, political items. I shouldn't have to remove my face because the value could be lower. Homes are devalued based on who lives there. We shouldn't have to do it but we should do it for the value. Values shouldn't be based on photos. 

My comment: Appraisers value the home and not the occupants. Home appraisal is a math formula. AVMs use the same formula but appraisers have all the data needed to ascertain value. We generally don't even know race, color of owner, borrower or of the comp homes that sold, are listed. It's a false narrative. That said I agree that you should remove personal items, photos, religious, political items for the listing photos, showings. Buyers want to imagine themselves in the home and not you. They want a blank slate. Homes look bigger without clutter. There are many articles about this online. Appraisers blur all photos that include people, religious items, political items, things such as gun collections, "personal" items... Even if you don't remove your photos, items, we will blur them.

Her definition of redlining is also incorrect. 70% property in HOLC map area D or red were owned by white people. While blacks, Latinos ... lived there whites owned most of the property. Whites were the main ones who had to pay higher interest rates to get the loans. Race wasn't included in all maps. Race was one of many, many factors included in the maps. We use all those same factors today except race. The factors i.e. property age, condition, value, predicted depreciation, income of residents, location near hazardous sites, freeways...are still used today. If you removed race from those maps, they were still just as accurate for risk. Race had NOTHING TO DO with the value or risk. 1935 HOLC program brought lots of money to those areas. Before this there were no loans or they were small and super expensive. Most areas in D zones are now totally refurbished and many are affluent areas. The HOLC program money actually helped. There is a lot of research which proves this but everyone likes to repeat the false stories. I remember when I first heard about redlining around 1983. I also believed that false shit until I did some research and educated myself. Here's an article I wrote about redlining citing the research. 
https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/05/redlining-in-home-loan-financing-mary.html

Lutalo: Should people put an appraisal pkg together?

Sanina: The listing agent advocates for the home value. Have a CMA, floor plan, survey, size, neighborhood details, upgrades, remodel, energy features to show appraiser how listing agent determined the list price.

My comment: The listing agent should already have a property package. Appraisers are open to receiving data. A list of similar sold, listed comparables is good. List of improvements, floor plan if available, survey, energy features... A list of maintenance items is fine but appraisers assume properties are maintained. Maintaining your property doesn't give you extra value.

Appraiser Tom Schurer: Tell the appraiser if there are multiple offers. Let the appraiser know what's happening in the community, developments.

Lutalo McGee: What about new rehabs in area where there aren't any new rehabs sold. 

Schurer: You make time adjustments on closed sales, use pending sales.

Lutalo: What do appraisers look at when determining value? What should homeowners do to their homes to prepare?

Schurer: Paint it. It gives a good clean feel. Kitchen, baths drive home values, school district, neighborhood. Nice curb appeal. 

My comment: If your home desperately needs a paint job, do it. Just don't expect 100% return on investment. Appraisers look mainly at location, size, bed/bath count, kitchen/bath condition in that order. Don't add a new kitchen/bath for an appraisal. You won't get 100% return on investment in terms of value. It's good to do it anyway if most homes have renovated kitchens, baths and you can enjoy it while you live there.

Question: What if appraiser asks for Tidewater?

Answer: Schurer: It means the appraiser needs help. They can't get value needed. They ask agent for help. Reconsideration Of Value ROV process. The new program looks good. Should be done by end of October and we can talk about it.

My comment: Tidewater: If the VA appraiser believes that the actual home value will be lower than the listing price, they will invoke tidewater. This is simply a heads up that gives the listing agent 48 hours to support the listing price. The agent will then provide similar sold comparables which support the list or contract price. I've found most of the time someone enlists Tidewater, contract/list price was over market value. 

Question: How do we navigate AI.

Answer: Schurer: AI will change our world and real estate. RE is a people business. We laughed at early AVM like Zillow. It's real good these days. My future will be reconciling data sets, not giving opinion of value. I will just say why a dataset is wrong for the value of a home (how would he know if he didn't appraise it?) We will still need our smart human brains. Play along. Don't be afraid. 

My comment: AI, AVMs are only as good as the data they have. GIGO, Garbage In Garbage Out. AVMs only work with newer, median size, median priced homes in average to good C3 condition. They don't work on older custom homes in fair/vastly improved condition with no view/views on irregular lots... We will still need appraisers for those types of homes. 

CEO Urban League Karen Freeman Wilson: We need to know historical context, how the past affects the present. We need to know how to eliminate barriers to home ownership. 

My comment: Totally agree.

The next webinar in the series will be with appraiser Chris Posey. Posey will teach us how to  read an appraisal report and spot red flags. My coment: Chris Posey is very experienced and knowledgeable. He'll be giving great advice.

Other questions:

"Nina Huggar 05:21 PM  

As a homeowner who wants to sale the property to someone I know, is it customary to reach out to the appraiser to come apprise the house myself? (A realtor won’t be utilized for this sale) My thought is, this will provide an accurate number to the buyer. Thoughts?

Cecelia Marlow 05:24 PM  

When we talk about appeals, how do we delicately engage the appraiser such that we are not calling into question their competency, yet adding value to the subject property that may come in lower than expected?

Anonymous Attendee 05:25 PM  

Is it okay or acceptable for your real estate agent to recommend a praiser?"

#marycummins #realestateappraiser #ChicagoUrbanLeague #RealEstate #AppraisalPrep #HousingWealth #Homeownership #VirtualEvent #ChicagoAssociationOfRealtors #NationalAssociationOfHispanicRealEstateProfessionals #RainbowPUSH #NHS #NAACP


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html