Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California

Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California
WEBSITE       RESUME       CONTACT       FACEBOOK        LINKEDIN       
Showing posts with label oakland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oakland. Show all posts

Monday, July 26, 2021

Racial discrimination alleged by Cora Robinson in real estate appraisal 5924 Martin Luther King, Oakland, California - by Mary Cummins

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins

01/04/2022 UPDATE: Based on a response to my FOIA response from HUD I believe the discrimination complaint filed with HUD was dismissed. HUD has not given an official answer though the investigation is over. They did previously force me to refile in order to extend the time to reply. HUD is fighting these FOIA requests forcing appeals. Because Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California didn't release any news saying they won the case it appears they lost. This was just another fake, frivolous discrimination complaint filed against an appraiser promoting the false narrative that appraisers are racists who low ball black home borrowers. 

ORIGINAL: Julian Glover just covered another story of alleged racial discrimination in a real estate appraisal in Oakland, California. After he ran his first story I contacted him via email and Twitter. Julian Glover never replied. 

The owner of the home is Cora Robinson. The home in question which they specifically mention in their public report is 5924 Martin Luther King, Oakland, California. The address is also public if you search for Cora Robinson's name. The author of the article included this information which is why I'm using it here. First, some facts.

5924 Martin Luther King Jr Way, Oakland, California 94609 is legally a 4 bed, 2 bath, 1.5 story home built 1885, 2,336 sf on 6,000 sf end lot. It's listed as last renovation 1940. I searched building and safety and see no permits for any upgrades or additions. The owners were in default in 2012, 2013. It appears one of them runs a hair salon called Your Locs out of one unit which I don't  believe is allowed per zoning. Please, no one report the business or unpermitted additional bedroom, bathroom. Times are tough enough. 

Zillow lists the home as 5 bed, 3 bath with a current AVM or automatic valuation method Zestimate of $1.2M, range $1M-$1.4M. RedFin estimates $1.1M. Trulia $1.2M. RealtyTrac estimates it as a 4 bed, 2 bath home at $1M. Realtor estimates it at $1.2M. CoreLogic refuses to give an AVM or RealValue because it hasn't sold in a long time and doesn't appear to have recent renovations. Their error variance is too high to give an estimate or even a guesstimate. 

Now for some allegations. July 2020 Cora Robinson said it appraised at $800K which would have been within the range of the AVMs at that time. Cora said Zillow was $1.3M at the time which is false. I'm glad she didn't white wash her home before the last appraisal. All appraisers saw the same exact home in the same condition. Oct 2020 appraisal came in at $825K. February 2021 it appraised at $1.2M. March 2021 she got a new 1st loan at $606K which is about 50% loan to value ratio which is a very low ratio. 

Cora states the property, area is not subject to rent control. Yes, it is. Just because she has a relative currently living there doesn't mean the next owner would be free of rent control. Cora states it's in the higher demand area of Rockridge. It's not. It's three neighborhoods south on the other side of the freeway. Cora states the appraiser made two appraisals. He made only one which he appears to have updated. Cora stated the "bad" appraiser used comps with "nearby homeless encampments, liquor stores, trash on the sidewalk, greater structural neglect and other markers of poverty." If you look at the satellite image of the subject property, that describes the subject's area exactly. There's a liquor store on the corner of Cora's block and a homeless camp one block away! Is this lady for real? She wanted the appraiser to use a $1.6M comp from Rockridge which is a mile north, north of the 24 fwy and a much better more expensive area. Cora said the "good" appraiser used comps "in all directions." We are supposed to use the best comps and not comps in "all directions." Cora thinks the appraiser should have only used higher comps located northwest of her home in the nicer "whiter" area of Rockridge. Cora literally said that the appraiser used comps in areas which have more black people i.e. "has a higher percentage of black residents" which Cora states has a negative effect on value. Who is the racist and biased one here?! Just to be clear Cora is black saying these negative things about black people and how they negatively affect property value. These are direct quotes from her actual written and sworn complaint! 

Cora received the home for free from her mother who received it for free from her grandmother. Cora states she was paying about 7 to 13% interest rate on her mortgage which she got in 2008 at the peak of then prices and interest rates. Everyone knows those loans were predatory. To be paying on that loan all those years is crazy. We're clearly dealing with someone who doesn't understand real estate or finance. She feels she should be paid the difference between that higher rate and her current rate. That is ridiculous. Cora agreed to the terms of the old mortgage. The lender is the one who refused the new loan. The main reason for loan refusal is the credit rating of the borrower. Cora states she is retiring which means refinancing again will be impossible. I believe an appraisal done by any appraiser at the earlier time would have been much lower than the current appraisal. You can't "sue" an appraiser for market value. No money was lost here. The appraiser also only works for the AMC and lender not the owner of the property. 

The home is an end lot on a very, very busy street with what appears to be a Metro train which then turns into a highway, see pic below of the subject property taken from across the Metro. 

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins


There are apartment buildings on the street, vacant lot, homeless camp, trash, liquor store. These things reflect negatively on the value. There are more regular lots than end lots which would skew the value higher for all duplexes in the area. I see current comparable sales at $800,000 to $1,500,000 with most $900,000 to $1,100,000. The sales at the lower end were end lots which have not been fully recently renovated. The sales at the higher end are regular lots away from traffic, apartment buildings which have been very recently fully renovated. These comps were given to me by robots. I don't have MLS for this area so I can't actively search it. No one can say I discriminated in my search for comparables as I didn't actively search beyond typing in the address. 

I just used a robot to do a default search for the property which is +/- 20% size within one mile radius. I only changed it to search for the previous 12 months. The comps I found for when it was appraised the first and second time were $755,000 and $850,000 which were right next to the subject, newer, larger and had more bedrooms, baths. The robot refused to search properties in Rockridge which is actually three communities and over a mile away. The more recent comps are $1.1M, $1.1M, $1.0M and $1.3M. I haven't seen the inside of the properties. They could have been and probably are full remodels. I saw some pics of the subject online. It's an old remodel which needs a full remodel. This claim is now officially busted. 

Below is the map from the search. Maybe this is what Cora means when she stated all the comps were in one direction in the first two appraisals. Most are in one direction even though I pulled a mile radius. Cora's area has commercial, retail, vacant lots, hospital... Maybe there are fewer duplexes in that area. See how far away Rockridge is from the subject, i.e. bottom right of the map. There are cute restaurants, shops, trendy grocery stores, nice parks in Rockridge. In North Oakland there aren't even any fast food chain stores. Fast food chain stores heavily research locations. A location without them has many negative issues. You can get food at the liquor store or the gas station in Cora's neighborhood. Look at the satellite image.

cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins
cora robinson, oakland, california, real estate, appraisal, discrimination, 5924 martin luther king, duplex, bias, mary cummins


Median sales price for a duplex this size in this area went from $900,000 to $1,200,000 within the last 12 months. That's a year from Cora Robinson's first appraisal. The property has gone up in value immensely between the time of the first and last appraisal. As I look at the chart it was about flat July 2020 to January 2021 then it went from $900,000 to $1,200,000. That's a 33% increase in value right there. The appreciation in this area has been skyrocketing because it's such an inexpensive area compared to other local areas. People who are priced out of the more expensive areas of Oakland are going to these less expensive areas. The duplexes selling for more have been recently fully renovated. I bet there are flippers buying run down properties and fixing them up for much higher resale which is driving a lot of the increase in value. The combination of flippers and people being priced out of more expensive areas has driven the explosion in value in this area. 

Based on the information about the subject property and the sold comparables I researched the first and second values could have been correct for that time. Based on the same a higher more recent appraised value would have been within the more recent range of values. It's also possible the more recent appraisal came in a little high per the real bed/bath count, location and condition of the subject. I have a feeling the appraiser will be cleared of wrong doing in this specific case. I did an information act request and will post the results when I receive them. They don't release them until after the investigation is finished. 

Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California released a press release stating they are helping Cora Robinson file a complaint to HUD. The complaint is an online form. She didn't need any help filling it out. It's easier than filling out a loan application. I personally feel this non-profit organization released this news for media attention to get donations. They should have hired a review appraiser to review the appraisals before submitting the complaint. They have most likely destroyed the reputation of the appraiser whose name they plastered all over their national press release, articles and media outreach.

Here is the press release from the FHANC.

 https://www.fairhousingnorcal.org/press-releases-and-statements/announcing-discrimination-complaints-filed-with-hud-allege-race-discrimination-in-home-appraisal-process

and the complaints

Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California Complaint 1
Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California Complaint 2
Robinson Complaint 1
Robinson Complaint 2 

FOIA request was made for all information related to the complaint. Results will be posted here. 

Based on my review of a few of these alleged cases of racism in appraising it appears some of these cases partly stem from the lay person not understanding the appraisal, appraisal process or appraised value. Because they don't understand everything, have experienced racism in the past in other ways, have seen the recent false and misleading news articles about racism in appraising they assume racism must be the cause of the value. People misunderstand situations and jump to the wrong conclusions every day. It would be great if people could first ask the appraiser, lender questions before assuming it was racism and attacking the appraiser, profession and all people of a different race/color. Assuming things about people of a specific race/color without evidence is actually the definition of racism. It's hypocritical for someone claiming racism to behave in a racist manner.

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Alleged racial discrimination case in Oakland, California, real estate appraisal, Saleem Shaheed, Sunnyside - by Mary Cummins

Saleem Shaheed, 9821 sunnyside, oakland, california, racial, discrimination, real estate, real estate appraiser, appraiser, appraisal, fha, mary cummins, los angeles, alameda, loan, lender,
Saleem Shaheed, 9821 sunnyside, oakland, california, racial, discrimination, real estate, real estate appraiser, appraiser, appraisal, fha, mary cummins, los angeles, alameda, loan, lender,

Here is another alleged case of discrimination in a real estate appraisal in Oakland, California. Saleem Shaheed purchased a Cape Cod Colonial home at 9821 Sunnyside for $430,000 Nov 26, 2019. It was listed at $475,000 for over a year and a half. It appeared to be a fixer home based on pics. At the time he got a $417,000 first loan which is a 96% loan to value ratio. He put down $23,000. Nov 2020 the home was appraised for $575K. Jan 2021 while applying for an FHA loan which has much stricter requirements for the home the value was $480K. Shaheed then ordered a third appraisal April 2021 which came in at $630,000. These values are as per Shaheed. 

Shaheed claims the second appraiser didn't give credit for the second bath. He also claims that appraiser clicked the box that said "no updates in last 15 years." Shaheed said that was incorrect because he added a new roof. A new roof is a maintenance item. It's not an update. The home per photos had roof damage and needed a new roof when he bought it, see photo below. An update, upgrade would be a fully remodeled new kitchen with new appliances and new bath of higher quality. It would include new electrical system and new plumbing. I would agree with the appraiser if the kitchen, bath were the same that I saw in the 2019 listing photos. The home does not have a legal second bath, see below. Shaheed complained, appraiser didn't change value and Shaheed filed a claim of discrimination against that appraiser's license. 

I'll first deal with the actual physical home in question. Address is 9821 Sunnyside St, Oakland, California 94603 in Alameda County parcel number 46-5463-8-2. On taxes and in public government documents it's listed as a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom home with 1,343 sf. Keep in mind Saleen Shaheed stated it's a 3 bed 1.5 bath home. An extra bedroom and bathroom makes a huge difference in value.

I got comments doubting the bed, bath count. Here is an ad for the house from 1967. It's a two bed, one bath home. "2 plus" means two legal bedrooms. 




The top image came from the MLS listing. It was listed at $475,000 from at least March 12, 2018 to November 26, 2019 with agent Jasmine on the MLS. It's listed as a 2 bed, 1 bath home with 1,343 sf. Then the agent made a video where she states it's 3 beds, 2 baths with 1,609 sf. Screen shot from the video below. The agent Jasmine Sunkara is a liar which is probably why she removed her website below. She listed the real bed, bath count and size on the MLS. Based on government records this home is legally 2 beds and 1 bath. That appears to be the main issue in this case. Saleem Shaheed bought a 2 bed, 1 bath home which he is now trying to pass off as a legal 3 bed, 1.5 bath home in order to get a higher valuation. The home is also across the street from an elementary school which negatively affects value compared to homes not next to an elementary school. 

Saleem Shaheed, 9821 sunnyside, oakland, california, racial, discrimination, real estate, real estate appraiser, appraiser, appraisal, fha, mary cummins, los angeles, alameda, loan, lender,

I looked at the pics of the bedrooms in the video. They are not all bedrooms. Below are the pics of the alleged bedrooms. Two top pics are of the same bedroom. 





A legal bedroom must have a real closet and not just an armoire or clothing rod on a wall if it's not a very old home which was built without one. A legal habitable room must be legal minimum height in order to be included in the total gross living area. While older homes with sloped walls on the sides are common the angled area where it slopes under six feet is not included in the gross living area. 

You'll notice the home is listed as 1.5 floors. It's not two stories. The second floor is not a full floor with full height wall to wall. Notice the dormer windows. Notice the angled, sloped walls in rooms. A legal room must have a heat source connected to the main part of the home and should have insulated walls and ceilings. Attics generally don't. Below is a pic of the side view of the home. You can see it's not a full two story home. The two bedrooms are on top on either side of the "2nd" floor. The main part of the first floor of the home is about 23' x 32' (762') based on Google measure minus average sized roof eaves. The 2nd fl could be about 581'. You can't add area of the stairs on the second floor. 2nd fl definitely not the same size as the first floor. The rear extended part of the home looks like an unpermitted enclosed porch maybe. The one car garage is on the other side of the home. 


I'm assuming the green room is also considered a bedroom. Notice the odd closet with a window in it. It almost looks like part of the second floor was an attic-like area that was converted. See the little low door that goes to a storage area. That area in there is probably angled. 

The last turquoise blue pic is not a bedroom. That is not a third bedroom. The walls are angled, roof is low and there is barely any walking floor space. I'm going off the video and listing. 

I saw only one pic of a bathroom in the video. It was just a close shot of a toilet and window so I'm assuming the bathroom is small. Just found a pic of the full bathroom. It's the main bathroom.



I don't know what the full or half bath looks like. As the extra bed is not legal I'm sure the extra half bath isn't legal either. The problem with non legal rooms built without permits and not to code is that Building and Safety could order them removed at any time if they are reported. If you are the bank you want to make sure the loan is covered by the value of the home. A legal 2 bed 1 bath home is worth less than a legal 3 bed 2 bath home even if they are the same size. A legal 2 bed 1 bath home is worth about the same as a 3 bed 2 bath home where the extra bed and bath are not legal. Anyone can report the owner today and he'll probably have to rip out the extra bed and bath. Please, don't report the guy. 

In every day appraising we see unpermitted additions especially in areas with more affordable homes. We generally note whether or not they were built to code and built in a workmanlike manner. We also mention if they pose a health and safety hazard and include photos. Some lenders allow the appraiser to count them as beds, baths and some do not. One thing to consider is if you were offered a legal 3 bed, 2 bath home and a legal 2 bed, 1 bath home with unpermitted extra bed and bath, which home would you choose for the same price? You'd choose the legal one because someone could report the unpermitted rooms and you'd have to remove them. Clearly the home with legal beds, baths is worth more. 

Just for a wide range of values below are the three main robot appraisal values. The values are based on a mathematical formula which is the same as what real estate appraisers use. We search homes +/- 15% legal gross living area within a half a mile from the subject sold within the last 3 months or max six months if there are no recent comparable homes sold. We then choose the most similar comparables based on size, bed/bath count, amenities, condition, view... 

Everyone knows garbage in, garbage out (GIGO) with computer software. Flawed, or nonsense (garbage) input data produces nonsense output. That's what we have here with our robot values. The first two went by the false MLS information stating it's 3 bed, 2 bath. The last one is based on the tax data and is 2 bed, 1 bath. The difference today between a 3 bed, 2 bath home and a 2 bed, 1 bath home is about $130,000. These values are as of June 15, 2021 which is later than any of the appraisals. There are eight months between the first and third appraisal. I'm sure the value increased significantly in the last eight months. 

Zestimate/Trulia $666K range $619K - $764K 3+2 1343 sf

Redfn $669K 3 + 1.5 1370 sf

Real AVM $533K range $469,216 - $597,184 shows as 2 bed + 1 1343

Back to the three appraisals, i.e. November 2020 $575K, January 2021 $480K FHA appraisal, April 2021 $630,000. Shaheed has a problem with the six month old $480K appraisal which was for an FHA loan. FHA loans are very restrictive on the type and condition of homes on which they will lend. They would count legal beds, baths. The FHA appraiser did not give credit to the second bath which could be proper based on condition, permits. There can be no health, safety issues or major code violations. A regular loan might allow an appraiser to consider unpermitted beds, baths. I obviously have not seen the home. I don't know the condition or if it's changed. Shaheed states he added a new roof and redid the kids' bedrooms. The roof is a maintenance issue. Redoing bedrooms doesn't add that much value to the home. The pics of the alleged bedrooms are pretty funky. 

There is one issue most homeowners don't understand. Most underwriters, lenders will not allow the final appraised value to be higher than the highest recent sales price of a similar home in the area. It's possible there were no recent higher sales of a similar 2 bed, 1 bath home when the 2nd appraisal came in at $480,000. There are few homes on the market so there aren't that many sales. Maybe most homes in the area are newer legal 3 bed, 2 bath homes. It's also very possible that there were some recent higher sales of 3 bed, 2 bath homes when the 1st and 3rd appraisals were done. I haven't seen the appraisals. 

Based on the legal bed, bath count the second appraisal would have been within the range of value for the home at that time for an FHA appraisal. Based on 3 beds, 2 baths the first and third appraisals would have been within the range of value for the home at the time of those appraisals. That would appear to be an 8% appreciation within eight months between appraisals one and three. That sounds about right for the market. Home values have been rising quickly in that area. Cheaper areas such as Oakland have seen a larger increase. People can't afford the nicer areas so they are moving to Oakland where homes are more affordable. That is quickly driving the price up sky high. Because I haven't seen the home I can't get more specific about the value of the home. I can say there are issues with the home that would cause a wider range of values, namely the legal bed, bath count and condition. 

A last issue is that most loans are declined due to credit worthiness of the borrower, their income, assets, debts and not the appraisal. It's up to the lender to approve the loan as a package comprised of the borrower and the collateral. The appraiser has no say in the loan approval. If the last appraisal was done April 2021, any loan should have closed by now. Shaheed stated he still doesn't have a loan. Shaheed said the value of the last appraisal was "good" so one can only surmise that the borrower is the issue. If he goes ahead with the loan now, he now may have to have the appraisal updated. 

*Disclaimer. I haven't seen any of the appraisals. I do review appraisals for banks. I am not appraising this home. I haven't seen this home in person. 

**All real estate appraisals completed on the 1004 form state the appraisal is only for the use of the client. The client is the AMC or lender. The appraisal cannot be used for any other purpose by other parties. The borrower is not the client or owner of the appraisal. The purpose of the appraisal is to make sure there is sufficient equity in the property to cover the loan balance and costs to foreclose the property by the lender. The borrower is entitled to look at the appraisal. The borrower cannot use the appraisal for their own use. 

Below is the video tour of the home. Agent removed one version of it within an hour of me posting the article. I saved a copy.
 

Below is the original article.


Original real estate agent's website which was removed.


Jasmine Sunkara 916.501.3393 #calbre#01855557 #NMLS#112033

Photo of roof before sale. It needed a new roof. 

Photo of living room. You can see water damage to the wall most likely from the roof damage.


Kitchen.




Government city, county, state property record for subject. 


I just checked permits. There was no permit to add a bedroom or bathroom. There were two permits the current owner pulled to add solar but it was never completed. There was no permit for a new roof. You need a permit to replace the roof. They need to make sure people use roofing material and application methods which are up to code and fire proof. 

08/12/2020
Permit Inactive
SE2000661
Solar Electric Panels
9821 SUNNYSIDE ST, Oakland CA 94603
Install roof-mounted 3.30 kW PV solar system with 10 modules.
08/12/2020
Permit Inactive
RE2001806
Residential Electrical - Alteration
9821 SUNNYSIDE ST, Oakland CA 94603
Install 13.5 kWh Energy Storage system, 225 amp Main service panel, load center, and backup gateway.

2019 the sewer and sidewalk were repaired. 

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit