Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Real Estate Appraisal, Los Angeles, California, Mary Cummins.

Mary Cummins is a real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California with 38+ years of experience. Cummins provides real estate appraisals for banks, lenders, mortgage brokers, Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs), lawyers, Courts, factors and private parties for lending, lawsuits, probate, estate planning, divorce and all types of litigation. Cummins provides 1004, 1073, 1025 and other form reports, narrative reports and historical appraisals besides real estate research and appraisal advice.

Showing posts with label latino. Show all posts

Sunday, September 22, 2024

Promoting People like Julian Glover who Promote the False Narrative of Allegedly Racist Appraisers is Racist and Wrong

Julian Glover was recently on the San Francisco Association of Realtors DEI panel. While I promote DEI (Diversity Equity and Inclusion), BLM, antiracism, civil rights, fair housing ... I don't promote racist people who promote racism. Promoting the false narrative of the allegedly "old white male racist appraiser" who allegedly "lowball blacks, latinos" is racism, ageism and sexism against appraisers besides an outright lie. I say this as a 58 year old female light skinned Latina appraiser.

When Julian Glover was a total unknown small time reporter in Northern California he intentionally sought out and promoted stories about unverified racial bias in real estate appraisal. He publicly stated in writing in the ABC website that people should send him stories about real estate and race. He was officially the "ABC7 News Race and Social Justice Reporter Julian Glover." In his bio linked above he states "In 2021 and 2022 my reporting on discrimination in the home appraisal process and devaluation of Black neighborhoods prompted action by the Biden-Harris administration and spurred legislation in Congress to address longstanding inequities." There was no devaluation of black neighborhoods. His articles didn't prompt the action. It was George Floyd's death in 2020, BLM and DEI. I followed his stories and did the research as an appraiser with over 40 years of experience as a licensed real estate appraiser and broker in California.

I would be the first person to go after a racist appraiser which is why I investigated the facts. I initially was like "WTF appraiser did this?!" Then the facts proved the values were market value. If only an alleged reporter would have done the same research and sought out an expert appraiser. Julian Glover didn't because it would have ruined his fake story and path to promotions, media attention and more money. He saw how people loved to get irate over articles about alleged racism. He got a lot of traffic and more ads were sold. It was his ticket to fame and fortune.

Julian Glover didn't even have to seek out an expert, request a review appraisal or request a new historical appraisal. I emailed him my research about the properties and appraisals in question proving they came in at market value, see links below. Just because a POC, anyone gets an appraisal value less than what they want does not mean it's automatically racism. I researched all his stories for a while then started writing my own articles because he never replied or corrected his stories. They're all in this blog.

Julian Glover then worked on the false and misleading televised program "Our America: Lowballed" which has been totally debunked by research and facts. This fake documentary covered all the fake cases which have been proven wrong by independent researchers. I wrote articles about every fake case as did others. Glover promoted the fake paper by Andre Perry. AEI proved Andre Perry's paper was false and incredibly misleading. White owned homes aren't worth more than black, Latino owned homes because "racist" appraisers went out and lowballed blacks, Latinos to "steal" their money. There weren't even any appraisers, appraisals involved in Andre Perry's values. They were done by robots, software programs specifically Zillow. Zillow is extremely inaccurate. Even Zillow states it's not an appraisal and not be relied upon for anything.

Here are the facts. Whites make more money than blacks, Latinos. People who make more money have more money. People who have and make more money buy more expensive homes in more expensive areas. That's why most white owned homes are worth more than black, Latino owned homes. Whites also own more expensive cars. Maybe people should sue "racist" Kelly Blue Book and CarMax. The issue is the income gap. Appraisers have nothing to do with the income gap. Neither does the housing industry. You can yell at, sue, be racist to appraisers all day long and it won't change anything. Fix the income gap and you'll fix the wealth gap!

Julian Glover, Andre Perry, ex HUD Marcia Fudge, Jillian White, Junia Howell and others have promoted these false racist narratives for their own agendas. Their agendas are to promote themselves and make money which they did. They were promoted and now receive more money for books and speaking engagements. Now they're even DEI "experts!" If I were as unethical and racist, I too could write a book, article, make a video about how all "races" other than Latinos are "racist" and lowball Latinos. I won't because I'm not a lying, unethical, racist person. How do these people live with themselves? They claim they want to fight racism yet they are the ones who are racist and inciting others to also be racist.

Here are the fake Julian Glover articles I covered. Someone probably saw a high Zillow value not realizing Zillow isn't accurate. When you have an older smaller home in fair condition Zillow value will be much higher than actual because it's averaging values of all homes in the area. Below are some of Julian Glover's fake articles and the Lowballed program I covered. I know I covered at least two more. I'll try to find them.

Cora Robinson

https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/07/racial-discrimination-alleged-by-cora.html

Shaheed

https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/06/alleged-racial-discrimination-case-in.html

Lowballed which I did finally watch

https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2022/10/abc-will-be-airing-false-misleading-our.html

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.

Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Mary Cummins

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate Services has been in real estate since 1983, over 35 years. She is licensed by the Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers. Mary Cummins was an agent and broker licensed with the California Department of Real Estate selling residential income, commercial buildings, raw land and homes for Merrill Lynch Realty in Beverly Hills and Westside Properties in Los Angeles before concentrating on appraisals. Mary Cummins currently provides real estate appraisals, expert witness testimony, historical research, legal real estate research for mortgage brokers, banks, lawyers, factors, insurance companies, financial consultants and private individuals. Mary Cummins was born and raised in Southern California. Cummins attended Beverly Hills Good Shepherd Catholic School and Beverly Hills High School. Besides being on the Dean's list, Mary Cummins was a top ten national swimmer and competed on the men's water polo team. Mary Cummins began college at the age of 15 attending the University of Southern California on scholarship, majoring in Psychology/Sociology. http://www.animaladvocates.us http://www.facebook.com/AnimalAdvocatesUSA

Friday, August 25, 2023

Important Alleged Discrimination Case Against Wells Fargo, Comment by Mary Cummins

wells fargo, racial discrimination, lawsuit, cv 00990, mortgage discrimination, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, real estate appraisal, credit, black, latino, white,complaint

Peter Christensen just wrote an article about this very important legal case. Wells Fargo is being sued for racial discrimination for rejecting mortgages of some black, Latino applicants. The lawsuit is based on appraisals and credit. They cite Andre Perry's false and misleading paper as evidence. This looks like a shakedown lawsuit to get WF to cough up a few bucks "without admitting guilt." This is what the false narrative of the alleged racist appraiser and real estate industry has given us. The government promoting the false narrative for their political agenda has caused this frivolous lawsuit. We all know based on AEI's research that blacks, Latinos are more likely to be rejected for loans based on socioeconomic factors and appraisal value. Blacks, Latinos have less income, less wealth, lower credit scores which is why they buy less expensive homes in less expensive areas.

"In March 2022, Bloomberg News published an article entitled “Wells Fargo Rejected Half Its Black Applicants in Mortgage Refinancing Boom” (registration required). Bloomberg’s researchers had combed through the data for 8 million conventional loan refinance applications in 2020 reported by lenders under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. The researchers saw stark differences in Wells Fargo’s approval rates for White, Black and Hispanic refinance applicants. They found that Wells Fargo approved 72% of applications from White applicants but only 47% from Black applicants. In contrast, Rocket Mortgage approved 86% of White applicants and 79% of Black applicants. For Hispanic borrowers, Wells Fargo’s approval rate was 53% versus a 79% industry average for Hispanics. Some might jump to an explanation here like “Black and Hispanic borrowers may not have the same average financial means as Whites.” Bloomberg’s research, however, showed that Wells Fargo’s approval rate was lower for Blacks in high income brackets than for Whites in low brackets.

After publication of the article, a half-dozen class actions were filed swiftly against Wells Fargo by Black and Hispanic borrowers who had been denied loans. The Federal District Court in Northern California consolidated these cases earlier this year under the new title In re Wells Fargo Mortgage Discrimination Litigation, U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Case No. 3:22-cv-00990.

The primary legal claims in the consolidated case are brought under the federal Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act. And, the alleged damages could be substantial – borrowers denied loan refinances in 2020-2021 may have lost out on saving tens of thousands of dollars on their mortgages by being unable to lock in historically low interest rates. The operative complaint in the case principally alleges a story about disparate treatment and impact in Wells Fargo’s mortgage determinations, including the bank’s use of flawed “centralized, universal, race-infected lending algorithms” or “digital redlining.” But part of the plaintiffs’ theory is also based on alleged bias in the appraisals relied on by the bank.

Here’s a key allegation pertaining to appraisals:

Wells Fargo knowingly incorporates, without adjustment, appraisals that have been shaped by years of race-based valuation standards or appraisals affected by race-based criteria. Homes in majority Black neighborhoods are worth an average of 23% less than homes in neighborhoods with “very few or no Black residents” and of similar home quality. (Citing Dr. Andre Perry’s research at Brookings “The Devaluation of Assets in Black Neighborhoods.”).

As a result, the plaintiffs allege that “Wells Fargo’s discrimination . . . has forced those who received below-market appraisals from Wells Fargo to abandon the process with Wells Fargo and turn elsewhere.”

"Plaintiffs Aaron Braxton, Paul Martin, Gia Gray, Bryan Brown, Elretha Perkins, Christopher Williams, Ifeoma Ebo and Terah Kuykendall-Montoya, individually and as representatives of a nationwide class of similarly situated applicants for original purchase mortgage, refinance and other home mortgage loans (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or the “Class”),

Go to the below link for the rest of this important article and lawsuit.

https://www.valuationlegal.com/2023/08/the-most-significant-appraisal-discrimination-case-doesnt-name-an-appraiser-as-a-defendant/

Copy of lawsuit from same site.

https://www.valuationlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/In-re-Wells-Fargo-Discrimination-Amended-and-Consolidated-Complaint-Fair-Housing-ECOA-3-24-23.pdf

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Mary Cummins

Thursday, August 3, 2023

AEI Response to PAVE Task Force AVM. Appraisers Are Not Racists and Don't Lowball Blacks, Latinos, comments by Mary Cummins

UPDATE 11/03/2023AEI proves once again that HUD, US Government lied about appraisers allegedly low-balling people of color. This is exactly what appraisers have been saying all along. "We find that seemingly large differences in the share of under-valuations–appraisals where the appraised value is below the contract price– received by people of color are almost entirely or entirely due to differences in geographies where people, regardless of race or ethnicity, reside. When comparing appraisals for people of color to those for non-Hispanic white people within the same census tract, we find that there are no or minimal differences.

This analysis suggests that commonalities in people’s experiences in buying a home (e.g. first-time home buyer status) or local market conditions (e.g. the presence of a market frenzy or seller concessions) are far more important than differences in people’s race or ethnicity when it comes to determining who receives an under-valuation and who does not. This suggests that studies by FHFA, Brookings, or Freddie Mac with their singular focus on appraiser racial bias have misdiagnosed the issue." #AEI #americanenterpriseinstitute #marycummins #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #HUD https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/confirming-alternative-explanations-for-appraisal-under-valuations-new-evidence-from-appraisal-level-data/

ORIGINAL: American Enterprise Institute (AEI) made some important independently researched statements in their comment letter about the PAVE Task Force, AVMs and real estate appraisers. It shows with verified facts the flaws in the research cited by PAVE. The research cited by PAVE was poorly done by the Urban Institute, Andre Perry then twisted to meet the agenda of UI, Perry. I have no issues with promoting the interests of black people. I'm Latino and promote the interests of Latinos, Blacks, Asians, women, lower income, homeless... I do have a problem with people falsifying research to promote an agenda with racist lies which hurt innocent people. Below are a few important issues raised in AEI's comment letter to the PAVE Task Force.

1. AEI stated First Time Buyers (FTBs) tend to overpay for properties. There are also more seller concessions. This would explain appraisals being at market value which is lower than contract price. I see this all the time because I appraise in these areas. It's not the result of biased, racist appraisers.

Urban Institute, HUD, PAVE stated that "racist old white male" appraisers were intentionally low balling blacks and Latinos. Their "proof" was a difference in contract price and appraisal values in census tract areas with more Blacks, Latinos. I'd commented at the time it was probably because there is a correlation between race and income. Whites make more money than blacks, Latinos. People who make more money have more money and buy more expensive homes in more expensive areas. Areas which are predominantly black, Latino are lower income areas with many first time buyers.

"The presence of first-time homebuyers (FTBs) or the use of seller concessions could affect the sale price relative to the AVM. Our analysis in “Exploring Alternative Explanations for Appraisal UnderValuation” shows a significantly higher share of FTBs in tracts with lower levels of non-Hispanic White residents. This is significant because the literature shows that FTBs tend to overbid for a home by approximately $3,000, or about 1% of the contract price for the average home compared to repeat buyers and that they use a higher share of seller concessions, which can amount to 2.01-3% of the property price."

2. The letter noted that homes in lower priced areas that are more likely to be predominantly black, Latino are generally in lower rated condition which would be C4, C5 rating as opposed to C3 and above. I see this every day in my inspections of these areas. Again, it has to do with money. The more money you have, the more you will spend to properly maintain and upgrade your home.

"Even though the paper controls for home quality as measured by an exterior condition rating, we found in other work that exterior condition ratings can be quite different from interior condition ones. We also found that home interior quality can be a significant factor in the difference between an AVM and a home’s sale price and that for a small number of properties with extreme conditions that difference was significant."

3. The letter also again stated that AEI found no effect of race on appraisal value.

"We have pointed out serious flaws in numerous studies that purport to show widespread appraiser bias or systemic devaluations of neighborhoods." https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/exploring-alternative-explanations-for-appraisal-under-valuation/

They suggest "To better measure and document appraiser racial bias, we once again propose reviewing every appraiser for racial bias and deliberate inaccuracies based on a comprehensive review of their past refinance appraisals. To that end, we have demonstrated a working methodology in “A Blueprint for Mass Screening Appraisers for Racial Bias and Inaccuracy Based on an Atlanta, GA Study” that could be implemented today by either FHFA, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac.Ultimately, the goal of public policy should be to identify biased and inaccurate appraisers and to prosecute the former and to educate and retrain the latter."

I fully support this. Please, fairly audit everyone's appraisals. I'd be the first to take racist appraisers out behind the woodshed. Take away their license, charge them with actual crimes and send them to prison. Stop blaming every appraiser for racism and bias. What really irks me is that these people are claiming racism and bias when they are doing exactly that to real estate appraisers. If you're against racism, bias, you should be against ALL racism or bias against everyone or else you're a hypocrite.

https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/a-response-to-the-recommendations-of-the-pave-working-group/

https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/A-Response-to-the-Recommendations-of-the-PAVE-Working-Group-FINAL-1.pdf?x91208

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Mary Cummins

Thursday, June 29, 2023

Real Estate Appraisers Mentioned in False Light in California Reparations Report by Mary Cummins

mary cummins, california reparations task force, california reparations report,real estate appraiser, real estate appraisal, california, los angeles, black, latino, reparations, slavery

The final California Reparations Report came out today. I just started reading it but thought I'd search for the words "appraiser" and "appraisal." Sure enough they're in there because Paul Austin and Tenisha Tate-Austin told their false story about alleged racial discrimination to the Task Force.

"Consider Paul Austin and Tenisha Tate-Austin, who bought a home in Marin City in 2016. Three years later, a white appraiser valued their home for $500,000 less than it was worth, calling it a “distinct, marketable area.”27 “I took that as code word as: it’s a Black area,” said Paul Austin, who testifed before the Task Force that he felt physically sick when he read the appraisal report."

The statement above is totally false. I sent in a correction. It was not valued for $500,000 less than what it was worth. The appraisals were never made public. I wrote an in depth fully research article about the Austin v Miller case here. https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/02/alleged-discrimination-home-appraisal.html

They were not discriminated against or low balled by the first appraiser. Marin City is a distinct area just like Pacoima, Beverly Hills, La Habra are distinct areas. The second appraiser came in way too high. My article above goes into the values in great depth. The second appraiser is the one who should be investigated by the California Attorney General, Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers, lose their license and be charged with bank fraud. The harm this case caused to the first appraiser is beyond comprehension.

I haven't gotten far in the report but did notice a few important things. The report mentions the racial and other bias against Mexicans, Native Americans, Asians, Jews, Catholics, immigrants, women, poor... All of these other groups were also affected by racial, color, gender and other biases. The report isn't about slavery per se as California was never a slave state. The report is about racial harm against black people living in California before 1900. Mexicans, Native Americans, Asians, Italians were lynched. Native Americans, Mexicans lost their lands and property. Mexicans, Native Americans, Immigrants were used as near slave labor. Women, men, the poor were raped by slave owners, employers, government sanctioned church... Mexicans, Native Americans, Asians weren't allowed to attend public school with whites. All this happened in California. Every state, nation, people has done truly horrible things to others throughout all of human history.

The Governor and others already said there will be no monetary reparations. California has a budget deficit. The report was done to educate the nation and for positive PR for California and it's politicians. The state would also have to consider the harm caused to everyone else before they ever cut a check. It would be discrimination to give money to only one group based on race. There was already a case here in Oregon over Covid funds. (The Oregon CARES Act Discrimination Lawsuit is Great Northern Resources Inc., et al. v. Katy Coba, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-01866-IM (L), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division.) They wanted to give some Covid funds to blacks only because they were more affected than whites but the state was sued due for discrimination. Latinos who were equally negatively impacted by Covid sued for discrimination so the funds had to be given to everyone who applied. Any reparations would be the same.

If we were to do a California Reparations Report for all races, colors, religions, genders... everyone in California would end up owing everyone else money. It'd cancel itself out. You'd also have to offset benefits of living in the state minus harm caused by past actions in the state by the state. I'm Mexican, Indigenous, African and Euro. Half of my ancestral family was harmed by the other half. The reports would just cost the state a lot of money and I'd probably get half a cent. I'll pass on that waste of funds. I personally am just very happy to live here in California. I'm lucky I was born in this state and in this country.

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Mary Cummins

Sunday, June 11, 2023

Reparations and Return of Lost Land by Mary Cummins real estate appraiser and genealogist

When Janice Hahn first made the motion to return Bruce's Beach to one of the original owners for $20,000,000 I knew it would start a real estate gold rush for "lost land" and it has. Blacks, Latinos, Indigenous, whites and everyone else will all be asking for payment for lands once maybe owned by their ancestors.

While the return of Bruce's Beach was big news it did not set a legal precedent because it was a gift. There was no recent lawsuit. The county of Los Angeles did not have to give the land back to the Bruces. The Bruces ultimately agreed to sell the property for much, much more than market value back in the day after an eminent domain lawsuit which they lost. It wasn't "stolen" from them. Had they invested that money back into real estate they would have much more than $20,000,000 today but they didn't. They sold the real estate and spent the money. They recently said they will sell the property again. In essence the family sold the property twice both times for more than market value. Some are upset they aren't keeping it in the family to build generational wealth for black families. It's their property to do with as they please. The real cause of the wealth gap among whites, blacks, Latinos is the income gap.

Because of the Bruces' big payday many people are thinking about asking for compensation for land once owned by their ancestors or maybe they just rented it or lived there. Sometimes that land was sold fair and square. Other times it was taken through legal eminent domain, failure to pay taxes, legal abandonment, questionable transactions, outright theft or war.

While genealogical documents, old newspapers, old real estate deeds can show some ownership interests and transactions, that might not tell the whole story. How will we figure out who actually owned the rights to the property and whether or not they actually sold or transferred it fairly and legally? How will we figure out which descendants should be compensated, for how much and in what order?

In 1923 20-150 black people were murdered in the Rosewood Massacre. It was sanctioned by the local government. The people who survived fled in fear abandoning their real and personal property. By the 1990's some considered a lawsuit but evidence and statute of limitations issues ended those plans. Years later a politician filed a bill to compensate the children of some victims for the losses. The few that were left got about $150,000 each. I watched the film in 1997 and did most of the genealogical research for the Rosewood Cemetery. I personally feel they deserved much more compensation but, Florida.

UPDATE:03/2024 A bill was filed to seek reparations for families displaced in Chavez Ravine. ORIGINAL: In the 1950's Chavez Ravine properties were taken, bought by eminent domain. The owners were compensated for the land. Some sold outright. Some filed lawsuits. Dodgers Stadium ultimately ended up being built on the land. During the eminent domain proceedings there were holdouts who sued. They lost the lawsuits but did get over market value for the land at the time. The descendants of some are now talking about suing to get Bruces Beach type of money. Some didn't even own the land but were just renters or lived there with others for free. Some renters were given relocation fees. In fact most living in Chavez Ravine at the time were renters. Do their children who never lived there have a right to new compensation? The stories of eminent domain actions for Los Angeles freeways, government buildings, schools are all very similar. Poor people living in poor areas were displaced for government projects. The government chose the sites based on logistics, economic feasibility and property values. Gov had to choose a site that was cheaper to preserve gov funds per law. Race was not a consideration. Many times the people displaced were just poor whites.

There are already sufficient laws to protect real estate rights in our country. Anyone can file a lawsuit to try to reclaim land they feel rightly belongs to them. They just need to provide proper documentation. There's currently a system for clearing heir property with clouded title. Some of these cases go back a few generations over 100 years. But what about people who owned the land before the US existed? In my state of California the land was previously owned by Mexicans, Spaniards and Indigenous people in that reverse order. Who has the legal right to the land and compensation?

In a recent article on this issue "A New Front in Reparations: Seeking the Return of Lost Family Land" Thomas W. Mitchell, a law professor and director of the Initiative on Land, Housing & Property Rights at Boston College Law School, stated “We are talking about the loss of heritage and history and culture.” “You are talking about a fundamental hit in terms of economic mobility and generational wealth.” But whose heritage, history, culture and wealth are we talking about? Should claims by Native Americans take precedence based on chronological order? They definitely lost their "heritage, history, culture and generational wealth" besides their lives. Did they legally sell or give their land to US states and nations? No, it was stolen, taken by the Spaniards, French, Russians, US states, USA and private individuals through brute force. Is brute force, war a legal means of seizing property?

What about the Spaniards. Did they legally give all Spain owned land grants to Mexico after the Mexican revolution? Did the state of California legally acquire land from Mexico after the war? At least the California, Mexican, Spanish land grant documentation still exists but there were no grants from Native Americans. Generally possession over a period of time shows rights to the land. Perhaps because the Indians didn't have a paper deed written in English filed at the local county assessor's office showing they owned the land they never really owned it. If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it...?

Bruce's Beach was originally owned by the Tongva Indians. There was no sign that said "Free land. Take whatever you want, kill us and send the rest of us on a death march to a small desolate area of the country." Should the Bruce family give the $20,000,000 to the Tongva Indians just like LA County gave it to them? Maybe the Tongva tribe should sue the Bruces? The Tongva weren't even allowed an eminent domain hearing. They were killed and forced off the land. Is that considered a legal real estate transaction? It's a legitimate question.

Another recent article talked about reparations and real estate in California. California was never a slave state yet a state commission was convened to study black slave reparations for residents. The commission considered papers and research on blacks, wealth, income and property. No reparations will be paid for many reasons. First and foremost the state doesn't have the funds. Second and more importantly one would need to consider reparations for all before you start handing out state money otherwise it's discrimination. There was already a black only Covid subsidy case which set legal precedent and reversed the subsidy. There are a lot of poor Latinos, Native Americans, Asians and even whites who are affected by some of the same negative influences in the Reparations Report. You don't have to be descended from slaves owned in another state to be poor in California. It was actually a good thing for those slaves and their descendants that their owners came to free state California because they were freed. They would have continued to be slaves in other states for much longer.

Latinos, Chinese, Japanese, everyone except the rich were taken advantage of for labor, real property, personal property through government actions all throughout California's history. Some Chinese were murdered in government sanctioned massacres and their property stolen. Others US citizens were expatriated to Mexico during the depression losing their land, jobs, income and all possessions. The Japanese were sent to internment camps but some have been compensated for some lost property. And don't forget about the Native Americans. Some were given rations and land but it was never equal to the land value of the US. Who gets reparations, land, how much and in what order?

In the article "Can Reparations Bring Black Residents back to San Francisco" linked above a woman talks about the old family home in Fillmore sold through eminent domain from her black grandfather. Her grandfather was paid market value for the property. Had he reinvested in real estate his family would have more money than the current value of their old home today. But they didn't. She still wants reparations for the value of the property. She also feels she personally should get the home back. What about the people who owned it before her? What about the Native Americans who owned the entire area and the Americas?

Descendants of black slaves weren't the only people living in blighted areas sold under eminent domain in California. Latinos, Asians, Italians, Irish, immigrants, Jews... poor people of every race and color including whites lived in those areas. Do they also get reparations? I realize it was the California Reparations Task Force which was formed to mainly look at reparations for the descendants of black slaves owned in other states and free black people who were in California by the 19th century. The purpose was to calculate racist and other harm done to black people. Still, the task force considered the economic effect of things which affected more than just descendants of black people. Other people experienced racism, colorism, sexism, genderism, religious persecution, people taking advantage of the poor... Will we revisit and re-litigate every act of eminent domain? Every land transfer? Every instance of a laborer being paid less than what they feel they were worth or due? Every murder and assault? Every slight ever made to another in California? Everyone would end up owing everyone else money and California would go broke.

Another woman in the article wants the tossed about figure of $5,000,000 per black Californian reparations so she can move back to expensive San Francisco. She states it's her home because she lived there when it was a less expensive blighted place. What about all the other poor people who also lived there and had to move? Blacks weren't the only people living there. What about the Indians who used to own it? It was their home for over 10,000 years. Currently they're trying to reclaim some of their land. They tried to reclaim Alcatraz but failed. They were given back some land in the form of reparations in the East Bay. Now they want to reclaim "Turtle Island" which is their name for all of North America.

So far we have no set answers but a Pandora's box full of question. We do at least have centuries of established real estate laws. Most of our real estate laws came from the British and are older their our own country. You sometimes see them cited in Supreme Court rulings. People have always been able to sue for these causes. We'll soon see if the courts will be flooded with lawsuits to unwind eminent domain actions and other real estate transactions. Title companies may be busy.

As I'm both a licensed real estate appraiser and genealogist perhaps this may be my new calling. I was able to figure out market value for Bruce's Beach property in 1920. I could appraise even older claims if I could find enough documentation. This may be the beginning of an interesting new era in genealogical real estate studies. Or we could just give Turtle Island back to Native Americans, go back to our ancestral countries and be done with it.

References:

AB 3121 Reparations Task Force Report https://oag.ca.gov/ab3121/reports

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Mary Cummins

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

Real Reasons Appraisers Come in Below Contract Price by AEI. It's not Racism, by Mary Cummins

AEI just released a report about appraisers coming in below contract price in areas with lower income buyers, lower priced homes and more blacks and Latinos. This is exactly what I've been talking about. Again, AEI proves it with science and facts. Just FYI AEI is considered a "conservative" source.

"Our critique points out some significant shortcomings of these studies. Notably, they focus on entire
neighborhoods, when they should study the actions of individual appraisers. They use the greater share
of under-valuations as evidence of racial bias, when they should consider explanations unrelated to bias
that might account for under-valuations, including for example the greater share of first-time
homebuyers, who tend to overbid, or the greater presence of seller concessions, which will reduce the
appraisal amount when they are properly accounted for. They also fail to note the size of these undervaluations. Using the Aggregate Statistics Data File and Dashboards, our analysis indicates they are relatively small, averaging about $1,100 to $1,900.5 These levels are too high if they are in fact due to racial bias. However, our analysis finds multiple other plausible explanations for under valuations of this magnitude such as the greater presence of first-time homebuyers or seller concessions. We also note
that under valuations of this magnitude of are unlikely to depress entire neighborhoods and, they may
in fact provide a disproportionate consumer benefit to minority homebuyers.

We conclude with a renewed call on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and regulators such as the FHFA to mass screen individual appraisers for racial bias and inaccuracies. We have already laid the groundwork for this research with a published working methodology."

The most important issue which I've stated previously is they focus on appraisal value and contract price for purchases and no refinances. When doing an appraisal for purchase the appraiser NEVER sees, meets the borrower, buyer. We may see the seller or the seller's agent but never the borrower. The government study also doesn't know the race or color of the borrower, buyer AND appraiser. What if it's only black appraisers coming in low with black borrowers? A recent horrible unreliable "study" showed that the appraiser who came in the lowest for black people was themselves black.

More important observations from AEI's study. Contract price does not equal market value. First time home buyers which are more likely in these lower priced areas are more likely to over bid. They don't always know they can negotiate. These same areas tend to have homes in lower condition. The appraiser adds more comps to appraisals which are below contract price. I do this to fully back up my work so everyone can understand the value. An appraisal that comes in below the contract price would not endear you to the AMC or lender. Appraisers HATE coming in below contract price but we do it because it's the right legal fair thing to do. The appraisal is to secure the loan not help a buyer or seller.

Some good snippets though you should read the entire report.

Fist time buyers offer over market value. "Shui and Murthy (2019) conclude that first-time homebuyers using Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac financing overbid for a home by approximately $3,000, or about 1% of the contract price for the average home compared to repeat buyers. They also find that FTBs with higher LTVs tend to overpay by more compared those with lower LTVs. FHA borrowers, who are disproportionally concentrated in minority census tracts and largely FTBs, typically have higher LTVs and lower credit scores and may thus be more likely to overpay than other buyers."

There are more seller concessions in these first time buyers, buyers using gov funding and these areas. If a home sells for $100,000 and has a $3,000 seller concession, appraisers subtract $3,000 from $100,000 in the adjustments. The net price is $97,000 which is under contract price now by 3%. There are more concessions to help buyers buy the property and because of condition.

There are more buyers for lower priced homes. This causes buyers to over bid for homes based on supply and demand. We saw this during the recent Covid runup. Buyers bid and paid over list price. They had to make up the difference in loan amount with a larger down payment.

First time buyers aren't just competing against other buyers but also against their rent. Many only compare what they are paying in rent to what their mortgage will be. Quick story. Friend of mine was buying a cheap mobile home. She wanted to buy a cheap home because the mortgage is less than her rent. She was buying it to save monthly expenses. Appraisal came in $20,000 below contract price of $85,000. She asked me for help. I told her appraisal value looked correct. I told her to ask seller to reduce price. She said "but it's actually worth $85,000! It's almost the cheapest house on the market! I will lose the home to someone else! I have to buy this home because the monthly payments are cheaper than my cheap rent!" She didn't care about the price but the monthly payment being less than rent. She only wanted to find a way to get $20,000 more cash for the down payment. Thankfully seller reduced the price. The appraisal gap prevented her from over paying for her first home. Many first time buyers in less expensive areas feel the same way.

Buyers using government funding tend to overbid. They're buying the home with someone else's money because of lower down payment requirements.They just want the home at any price believing it will instantly go up in value and they will have thousands in equity to take eventually. The government told them this is the American dream.

The actual appraisal gap is small. There is almost no gap in Latino areas and 1% in black areas. The government made this huge stink about appraisal gap and there barely is one! "In our prior critique of Freddie Mac’s research note, we find that “there appears to be no gap [in home purchase appraisals] relative to White tracts for Latino tracts and a relatively small gap [in home purchase appraisals] of 1-2% for Black tracts.” They mean predominantly white, Latino or black census tracts. None are 100% white, black or brown. That means whites are having the same issues in those areas as blacks and Latinos. The gap is not a color issue because the same things happens to whites in the same area.

AEI again debunks Andre Perry's "paper." Perry stated appraisers devalue black owned property by $48,000 per home. That's much more than the difference in contract price and appraised value of 1%. AEI pointed out that homes owned by poor whites are also valued less than homes owned by wealthier whites. It's not because of skin color but income, wealth and location.

Appraisals coming in below contract price can help lower income Latino, black buyers. They can renegotiate with the seller. The government didn't say the buyers never closed on the properties and the deals died. They're prevented from overpaying and ending up upside down. AEI state that the government is part of the problem. They help and allow buyers to over pay for homes at the top of the market only to lose those homes later when the market tanks or they have a financial emergency. And you know who the government falsely blames for that? Appraisers!

This kind of reminds me of the destroyed apartment buildings in the Turkey earthquake. Their President bragged that he reduced earthquake requirements to allow the construction of 300,000+ homes for lower income people. That is one of the major causes of the high fatalities in the earthquake. The President basically killed people. FHA and the government like to brag that they helped low income people buy homes. Then they lose their homes because they over paid at the peak of the market and couldn't easily pay the mortgage. Also reminds me of our student loan problems. Latinos, blacks are the ones stuck with huge student loans while the government brags they helped them get an education. Most didn't even finish their education and get the degree or certificate. Most of the ones that did didn't even get the better paying promised job. Governments just want to brag that they "helped" people not caring that they actually destroyed them financially. If the government helped them find a way to earn more money, they could buy a home on their own and afford to stay in it.

AEI suggest mass screening of appraisers to check for racial bias. I support this. If any appraiser knew of a racist appraiser who came in low on a black, Latino owned home because of their racial bias, they would love to take that appraiser back behind the wood shed. All appraisers are being attacked, vilified, defamed based on this false narrative of the "racist old white male appraiser." While racism sure as hell exists, not all appraisers are racists who lowball Latinos and blacks. If there are appraisers doing this, other appraisers would be the first to hold them accountable and strip them of their license.

FTR Dan Wiley of Freddie Mac stated this about their appraisal gap research. "We have not reached any conclusion for cause of the gaps or correlation. Our research showed that further studies are warranted." Danny Wiley and Freddie Mac are doing further research into the possible causes of the appraisal gap. They are looking at all the new data and reviewing all appraisals involved in the appraisal gap research. Of course that hasn't stopped Marcia Fudge, HUD, media... from running with Freddie Mac and other's inconclusive data about appraisal gap from stating it's allegedly caused by racial discrimination by appraisers.

https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/exploring-alternative-explanations-for-appraisal-under-valuation/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=exploring_alternative_explanations_for_appraisal_under_valuation&utm_term=2023-02-14

Mary Cummins

Saturday, October 22, 2022

Dia de Muertos Celebration Grand Park Los Angeles October 22, 2022 by Mary Cummins

Mary Cummins, Dia de Muertos,Grand Park, Los Angeles, California, October 22, 2022, altaras, ofrendas, real estate appraiser, real estate, appraiser, appraisal, folklorico dancing, las catrinas mariachi

Mary Cummins, Dia de Muertos,Grand Park, Los Angeles, California, October 22, 2022, Day of the Dead, altars, ofrendas, real estate appraiser, real estate, appraiser, appraisal, folklorico dancing, las catrinas mariachi

Tenth 10th Annual Dia de Muertos celebration at Grand Park 200 N Grand Ave, Los Angeles, California 90012. It was between Grand Ave and Hill St. between 1st and 2nd St. Below is the event schedule for opening day October 22, 2022. Las Catrinas Mariachi Band and Grupo Folklorico Huitzillin & Teatro Aztlan were there along with poetry reading, sugar skull decorating, Dia de Muertos face painting and a few booths. This was also the 10th Anniversary of Grand Park. It was the Grand Avenue Arts All Access

Below are a few photos and videos of the event. @mariachilascatrinas
Event information: https://grandparkla.org/event/grand-parks-downtown-dia-de-los-muertos-2022/

Grand Park’s Downtown Día de los Muertos honors people, places and ideas that merit reverence and commemoration. Grand Park’s Downtown Día de los Muertos is a community-oriented space inviting park-goers to contribute to the community altar, ideated by artist and educator Consuelo Flores and to stroll through the park viewing numerous altars made by professional artists and local organizations. Additional public programs and activities on the opening day to include, poetry reading by Women Who Submit and Luis Rodriguez, musical performance by Las Catrinas Mariachi Band, dance performance by Grupo Folklorico Huitzillin with Teatro Aztlan, sugar skull decorating with East Los Sweets and colorful chalk art with KDaze Art. Plus professional face painting with Color Me Face Painting.

"Curator’s Statement

By Consuelo G. Flores

Los Angeles is comprised of different communities with rich, impactful histories and cultural contributions. What you’ll see as you walk through Grand Park are exquisite threads that create tapestries that focus on legacies, families, and the beauty of our diverse Latino community.

Día de los Muertos/Day of the Dead at Grand Park, offers Los Angelenos and city visitors the opportunity to interact with an intimate and important component of the celebration – the ofrendas/altars. Each installation gives the viewer a glimpse of the person(s) being remembered, who they were in life, what was important to them, what brought them passion, what their impact was on those still living and especially how they were loved. As you visit with each ofrenda, perhaps you can imagine sharing a cup of coffee or a sip of tea or getting a good book, movie or play recommendation from those who are being remembered.

Each altar is dedicated to people like you or me or someone we know, who lived, loved, and became part of our community. Sometimes they were here for a long time, sometimes for a short time – but always an impactful, memorable time.

As you interact with and learn from each ofrenda, remember what the Día de los Muertos/Day of the Dead celebration is in three simple tenets: