Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California

Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California
WEBSITE       RESUME       CONTACT       FACEBOOK        LINKEDIN       
Showing posts with label defamation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label defamation. Show all posts

Monday, January 30, 2023

Maryland Lawsuit Alleged Racial Discrimination Real Estate Appraisal Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott by Mary Cummins

Shane Lanham, 20/20 Valuations Inc, Shani Mott, Nathan Connolly, real estate appraiser, appraisal, discrimination, maryland, 209 Churchwardens, Baltimore, Maryland 21212, lawsuit, complaint, defamation, Mary Cummins
Shane Lanham, 20/20 Valuations Inc, Shani Mott, Nathan Connolly, real estate appraiser, appraisal, discrimination, maryland, 209 Churchwardens, Baltimore, Maryland 21212, lawsuit, complaint, defamation, Mary Cummins

UPDATE 03282024 Link to another article about case.

https://appraisersblogs.com/loandepot-appraisal-discrimination-settlement/

03272024 One Plaintiff Dr Mott passed away early March. There has been a settlement by the AMC. Lawyer Peter Christensen has the story. I agree with Peter that most Plaintiffs truly believe they have been discriminated against. They've probably been discriminated against based on their race in the past so they believe any discrepancy must be race discrimination. 

There is a confidential financial component to the settlement but publicly the AMC "loanDepot.com agreed to an extensive revamping of: (a) its reconsideration of value practices; (b) fair housing/non-discrimination training requirements; (c) statistical tracking of appraisal outcomes; and (d) contractual requirements for AMCs and appraisers." I personally feel this won't change anything in the real world. As AEI research has shown there is no discrimination or racial bias in real estate appraisals. It's a math formula. Based on my research the appraiser was correct and Plaintiffs in this case were wrong, see below for evidence.

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7178159528901816320/

As far as I know the appraiser has not settled. 

UPDATE: Shane Lanham real estate appraiser with 20/20 Valuations Inc just sued homeowners Shani Mott and Nathan Connolly for defamation for their alleged false public claims about him. This is a countersuit to their United States District Court case 1:22-cv-02048-SAGU.S. District Court, District of Maryland (Baltimore). 

Shani Mott and Nathan Connolly sued Shane Lanham for racial discrimination based upon his real estate appraisal valuation of their home. They stated he intentionally appraised their home for less than market based on, due to their race, color because he is allegedly a "white racist." Below is the court information.

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:22-cv-02048-SAG Connolly et al v. Lanham et al, Assigned to: Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher, Cause: 42:405 Fair Housing Act, Date Filed: 08/15/2022, Nature of Suit: 443 Civil Rights: Accomodations.

I read the original case last year but was too busy with other things to fully research it and write an article. I did do some research at that time. Based on my research the Plaintiffs over paid for their home when they originally bought it. It is not fully remodeled or upgraded. It's on a very busy highway. It's smaller with fewer beds, bath than MLS listings. 

It was on the market a while starting at $536K 04/2016 then $529K 06/2016 then $499 07/2016 then $479 10/2016 then sold $450 03/2017 a year later. 10% drop in list price. Sold 6% less than final list price. Just because you pay less than list doesn't mean it's a good price. You can still be paying over market value. It took a long time to sell because of condition, size, bed/bath count and location on a very busy road. These people intentionally bought almost the cheapest house in the neighborhood because it had major issues. Now they want it to be worth as much as the best home in the entire neighborhood. There is a more valuable neighborhood near the subject property neighborhood. The homeowners wanted the appraiser to only use fully remodeled larger sales in that more expensive neighborhood that are not on busy streets like subject. Those comps aren't similar to subject. They are superior. I agree with every argument made by appraiser Shane Lanham in his answer and counter claim. 

The busy street is a negative. Most people would NEVER buy a home on a busy multi-lane double lined highway. The issue is noise pollution, air pollution, safety because of cars and security. The subject also has fewer bedrooms, bathrooms than the higher sales. The original appraisal was seven months before the second appraisal. The market appreciated between the time of the first and second appraisal. 

We have not seen the second appraisal. Based on what I'm seeing it came in way too high. Maybe the appraiser was pressured by the lender, AMC or homeowners. Maybe he feared a complaint or lawsuit. Considering that the false narrative of the "racist white appraiser" has been amplified by the media I could understand that. I still would never come in at any value other than market value. That second appraiser's misleading value is the reason for the original frivolous, meritless lawsuit. 

Shane Lanham has been severely damaged. Look at the false online reviews against his business. I've read some articles and the comments are hateful. I bet he got death threats. I'm sure he's stressed to the max. I'm positive he lost business. His reputation has been destroyed. 

In these instances of alleged racism in appraisals you can't prove the results were the result of racism. You must prove that to win a lawsuit against an individual appraiser. It could be error, malpractice or totally explainable by facts like in this case and the other cases I've investigated. There is no evidence except the homeowner not liking the value. It's just someone's emotion. It feels that way to them in light of the current tension between some whites and some blacks, Latinos. Police brutality against blacks, Latinos like George Floyd, Tyre Nichols is flaming the tension. The misleading, misinterpreted paper by Andre Perry makes it worse. Politicians, some nonprofits, media promoting the false narrative of the racist appraiser to get votes, money for their department, donations for their nonprofit and ad revenue. It's also the existence of the very real income gap.  I'm sure some really feel the appraiser was racist because of their past experience with some whites, racism and what's happening in the media. Some are on the defensive. Still, one needs to separate emotion from facts. 

An example comes to mind. A black woman on LinkedIn said a white man told her to smile. She flew into a rage saying it was racist. She said the white man treated her like a black minstrel player that he wanted to entertain him. Ask any woman of any color and they will all tell you that guys have told them to smile. Happened to me and I have white skin. The real reason has nothing to do with race. Here's an article about it. I separated my emotion from fact and realized that I wasn't targeted because of my race, color, hair color, what I was wearing... It was because I was a female and the person telling me to smile was a guy.

I just did some robot appraisals. Mind you all of these are too high because robots don't know it's inferior condition, size and location on a busy street. AVMs will appraise these homes higher than market value for this reason. Knowing that all of the AVMs came in much lower than the second appraisal. That shows the second appraisal is the issue. Did their buddy do the second appraisal? Something is very wrong there. The only time an appraiser should come in higher than robots is when the subject is vastly superior in quality, upgrades, condition, view, specific location or some other factor. This property should come in lower than robots for that reason. 

First appraisal was on 06/14/21 for $472K
Second was on 01/18/22 for $750K

Below are robot values which are too high because they don't know subject is on busy street, smaller and in inferior condition to most other homes recently sold. The AVMs are also using comps from subject area and other surrounding neighborhoods. They should only use comps in the same neighborhood with same busy street location and condition. The names of the sites have links to their guesstimates of value. Notice the large range in values. CoreLogic is the lowest. They are generally the most accurate as they use sales in same area. CoreLogis is high because AVMs can't see condition, location on busy road or the real smaller size.

Realtor

June 2021 6/21 

Collateral Analytics $564K
CoreLogic $542K
Quantarium $576K

January 2022 1/22 $571 $591 $610

01/23 $765

Trulia

01/23 $669

Zillow 

6/21 $620
1/22 $605
01/23 range $602-750

RedFn 

6/21 $559K
1/22 $587K
01/23 $627K

Original lawsuit by Plaintiffs.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/refinance-complaint-loandepot.pdf

Shane Lantham's lawsuit for defamation, counterclaims and answer to above lawsuit.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gvlDz22T4zUfhnNPW8KqFDeZbhSK_CRJ/view?usp=sharing

Good articles about this lawsuit. Turns out Nathan Connolley teaches racism, capitalism and politics. He wrote a book "A World More Concrete: Real Estate and the Remaking of Jim Crow South Florida." Mott teaches African studies. Looks like this lawsuit was to promote themselves.

https://www.workingre.com/appraiser-counter-sues-black-plaintiffs-who-alleged-discrimination/

This article posted the first appraisal and motion to dismiss. Because the homeowner mentioned and included parts of the appraisal in the lawsuit the appraiser may share it in a lawsuit. Normally these are confidential and can't be shared with anyone except the client. 

https://wp-orep-cdn.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/30175939/Baltimore_Bias_Suit_Motion_to_Dismiss_Dec122022_48.pdf

Another good article on the case.

https://appraisersblogs.com/appraiser-countersuing-black-homeowners-4-defamation

Docket to date is below

Date Filed

#

Docket Text

08/15/2022

1

COMPLAINT

against 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham, Loandepot.com, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402receipt number AMDDC-10102080.), filed by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott. (Attachments: #

1

CivilCover Sheet, #

2

Summons, #

3

Summons, #

4

Summons)(Relman, John) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

2

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Soohyun Choi

(Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10102238.) by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott(Relman, John) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

3

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Gabriel Diaz

(Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10102268.) by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott(Relman, John) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

Jury Trial Demand by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott(jb5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

4

Summons Issued 21 days as to 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham, Loandepot.com, LLC.(jb5s,Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

5

NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner. NathanConnolly, Shani Mott or counsel for Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott are required to review and complywith the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded

here

. Pursuant toStanding Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded

here

, counsel has 14 days from the date of thisnotice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which canbe downloaded

here

. To file your consent, go to

Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 PctMag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge

. To file your declination, go to

Civil > OtherFilings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge

. Failure tofile a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the casemanagement order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 8/29/2022. (jb5s,Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/15/2022

6

Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner on 8/15/2022. (jb5s, DeputyClerk) (Entered: 08/15/2022)

08/19/2022

7

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

2

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Soohyun Choi.Directing attorney Soohyun Choi to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland throughPACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The

Pro Hac Vice

optionmust be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 8/19/2022. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered:08/19/2022)

08/19/2022

8

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

3

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Gabriel Diaz. Directingattorney Gabriel Diaz to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER athttps://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The

Pro Hac Vice

option must beselected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 8/19/2022. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/19/2022)

08/26/2022

Case Reassigned to Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher. Magistrate Judge Beth P. Gesner no longer assignedto the case. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/26/2022)

09/01/2022

10

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott. All Defendants.(Relman, John)(Entered: 09/01/2022)

09/07/2022

11

NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Patrick Johnson on behalf of 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham(Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

12

NOTICE of Appearance by Gregg Edward Viola on behalf of 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham(Viola, Gregg) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

13

NOTICE of Appearance by David Edward Mills on behalf of Loandepot.com, LLC (Mills, David)(Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

14

NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L Halliday on behalf of Loandepot.com, LLC (Halliday,Katherine) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

15

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time

to Respond to Complaint and to Set a Briefing Schedule forDefendants' Motions to Dismiss

by Loandepot.com, LLC (Attachments: #

1

Text of Proposed Order)(Halliday, Katherine) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

16

ORDER granting

15

Joint Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and to Set a BriefingSchedule for Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 9/7/2022.(kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

17

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Michelle L. Rogers

(Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10141478.) by Loandepot.com, LLC(Halliday, Katherine) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/07/2022

18

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jorge Sarmiento

(Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10141493.) by Loandepot.com, LLC(Halliday, Katherine) (Entered: 09/07/2022)

09/08/2022

19

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

17

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Michelle L. Rogers.Directing attorney Michelle L. Rogers to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Marylandthrough PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The

Pro Hac Vice

option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 9/8/2022. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)(Entered: 09/08/2022)

09/08/2022

20

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

18

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Jorge Sarmiento.Directing attorney Jorge Sarmiento to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Marylandthrough PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The

Pro Hac Vice

option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 9/8/2022. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)(Entered: 09/08/2022)

10/12/2022

21

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer

to Respond to Complaint

by 20/20 Valuations,LLC, Shane Lanham (Attachments: #

1

Text of Proposed Order Order)(Johnson, Mark) (Entered:10/12/2022)

10/13/2022

22

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

21

Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due 11/14/2022.Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 10/13/2022. (vals, Chambers) (Entered: 10/13/2022)

10/27/2022

23

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney

by Loandepot.com, LLC (Attachments: #

1

Text of ProposedOrder)(Halliday, Katherine) (Entered: 10/27/2022)

10/27/2022

24

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

23

Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Katherine L Hallidayterminated. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 10/27/2022. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered:10/27/2022)

10/28/2022

25

AMENDED COMPLAINT against 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham, Loandepot.com, LLC,filed by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott.(Relman, John) (Entered: 10/28/2022)

10/31/2022

26

NOTICE by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott re

25

Amended Complaint

Amended Complaint Redline

(Relman, John) (Entered: 10/31/2022)

11/07/2022

27

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to

25

Amended Complaint

and forBriefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss

by 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham (Attachments: #

1

Text of Proposed Order Order)(Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 11/07/2022)

11/08/2022

28

ORDER granting

27

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to

25

AmendedComplaint and for Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss

and for Briefing Schedule for Motion toDismiss

. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 11/8/2022. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered:11/08/2022)

12/05/2022

29

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David DePriest

(Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-10304019.) by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott(Relman, John) (Entered: 12/05/2022)

12/05/2022

30

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

29

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David DePriest.Directing attorney David DePriest to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Marylandthrough PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The

Pro Hac Vice

option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 12/5/2022. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk)(Entered: 12/05/2022)

12/12/2022

31

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

by 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham(Attachments: #

1

Memorandum in Support Memo of Law, #

2

Exhibit 1, #

3

Exhibit 2, #

4

Exhibit 3,#

5

Exhibit 4, #

6

Exhibit 5, #

7

Exhibit 6, #

8

Exhibit 7, #

9

Exhibit 8, #

10

Text of Proposed OrderOrder)(Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 12/12/2022)

12/12/2022

32

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

by Loandepot.com, LLC (Attachments: #

1

Memorandum in Support, #

2

Exhibit A, #

3

Exhibit B, #

4

Exhibit C, #

5

Text of Proposed Order)

(Mills, David) (Entered: 12/12/2022)

12/13/2022

33

NOTICE by Loandepot.com, LLC re

32

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

Replacement Exhibit A to Motion to Dismiss

(Mills, David) (Entered: 12/13/2022)

12/29/2022

34

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to

28

Order on Motion for Extensionof Time to File Response/Reply,

by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott (Attachments: #

1

Text of ProposedOrder)(Relman, John) (Entered: 12/29/2022)

12/29/2022

35

PAPERLESS ORDER granting

34

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re

32

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

,

31

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State aClaim

. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/29/2022. (vals, Chambers) (Entered:12/29/2022)

01/24/2023

36

ANSWER to

25

Amended Complaint

, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by 20/20 Valuations,LLC, Shane Lanham.(Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 01/24/2023)

01/24/2023

37

Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham identifying OtherAffiliate General Star National Insurance Company for 20/20 Valuations, LLC, 20/20 Valuations,LLC, Shane Lanham, Shane Lanham.(Johnson, Mark) (Entered: 01/24/2023)

01/26/2023

38

NOTICE of Appearance by David S Wachen on behalf of 20/20 Valuations, LLC, Shane Lanham(Wachen, David) (Entered: 01/26/2023)

01/30/2023

39

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 35 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply,

by Nathan Connolly, Shani Mott (Attachments: #

1

Text of Proposed Order)(Relman, John) (Entered:01/30/2023)


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Sunday, June 5, 2005

Mary Cummins wins Kathy Knight-McConnell lawsuit as a pro se, Mary Cummins

On July 7, 2003, Kathy Knight-McConnell sued Mary Cummins for securities law violations, trademark infringement, defamation, and other claims in federal court in New York. At the time of the litigation, Knight-McConnell ran a forum for investor discussions and published a newsletter on various stocks. According to a court decision in the case, Cummins, a stock trader from California, posted statements on website discussion groups and on her own website describing Knight-McConnell as a securities fraud "criminal" and "paid to lie to investors," among other things.

In addition, Knight-McConnell alleged that Cummins intentionally maligned certain stocks that she promoted in order to drive their price down in violation of the securities laws. Knight-McConnell also claimed that Cummins violated trademark law by linking to Knight-McConnell's website without permission, using Knight-McConnell's name in the post-domain path of URLs for seven of her web-pages, and posting links on Internet chat forums and discussion boards directing users to visit these pages.

In a July 2004 opinion, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald dismissed the securities and trademark claims. The court indicated that Knight-McConnell had no standing to bring a securities law claim because she did not allege that she purchased or sold the stocks in question in reliance on any statement by Cummins. The court dismissed the trademark claim because linking to Knight-McConnell's site without permission was not likely to cause confusion as a matter of law:

"Even if we assume that plaintiff's name is a valid and protectible mark, plaintiff has not alleged that the defendant engaged in any conduct that is likely to cause confusion as to the origin of the defendant's website. The mere appearance on a website of a hyperlink to another site will not lead a web-user to conclude that the owner of the site he is visiting is associated with the owner of the linked site. This is particularly true in this case because defendant's website advertises real estate and web design services, not investment services, and defendant is continuously dissassociating herself from plaintiff by criticizing her and accusing her of misconduct."

Judge Buchwald also determined that using Knight-McConnell's name in URL paths was not likely to cause confusion as a matter of law because a URL "merely shows how the website's data is organized within the host computer's files" and does not suggest affiliation, source, or sponsorship.

Looking at Knight-McConnell's many state law claims, Judge Buchwald determined that the complaint likely stated a cause of action for defamation, but that a defamation claim was not sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction on the court. Buchwald indicated that Knight-McConnell's tortious interference with contract claim might be sufficient to establish jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute, but that Knight-McConnell had failed to adequately plead this cause of action. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and granted Knight-McConnell permission to amend her complaint.

Knight-McConnell amended her complaint, but, upon a renewed motion by Cummins, Judge Buchwald dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction in June 2005.

Full docket report
http://www.freecourtdockets.com/Dockets/Knight-McConnell-v-Cummins-1-03-cv-05035-New-York-Southern-Federal-District-Court-Docket-Page-1-87407-87407.htm

Independent review of the case by Citizen Media Law Project. I have no idea why these people had an interest in this frivolous case. Of course this was the very beginning of internet law.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/knight-mcconnell-v-cummins

Mary Cummins is a real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California. She also advocates for the protection of investors from stock scams especially those perpetrated by company paid stock promoters. She aided the SEC in their prosecution of stock promoter John Westergaard in 2000 and 2001. She also warned investors about stock scams involving the following companies, TMOT Titan Motorcycle Company, EZR Easyriders, UMCC Ultra Motorcycle Company, NPCT Nanopierce, JNOT Jag Notes and others.

Kathy Knight-McConnell was a company paid stock promoter at the time of the lawsuit. She worked for Nanopierce symbol NPCT. NPCT was never profitable.

Here is her old website. I saved copies of all of it. Click "about" to see her photo of herself. Click "boycott raging bull" to see how she feels about me. Click "NPCT" to see her paid tout job.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030206180859/http://investortoinvestor.com/

Pdf copy of the docket from Pacer

http://www.marycummins.com/kathy_knight-mcconnell_vs_mary_cummins_docket.pdf


I wish I could find her original complaint. I had to read it three times just to try to figure out what the hell she was suing me for. It was all over the place. Finally figured it out and replied.

May 25, 2004. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(b) MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, LACK OF PERSONAL
JURISDICTION, IMPROPER VENUE, and FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

http://www.marycummins.com/knight_mcconnell_motion_to_dismiss.pdf

Knight-McConnell then filed a motion to strike my motion to dismiss claiming I had a ghost writer. March 25, 2005 Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald orders me to "send an affidavit attesting to the fact and explaining how you obtained the legal scholarship that is reflected in the motion papers." It's called being stressed out of your mind that you are being sued so you stay up many long nights researching how to write and file papers. This was also my second pro se lawsuit as a defendant. I was previously sued for something similar in a Philadelphia court, see Ashton Technology vs Mary Cummins. I learned a lot from JohnDoes.org . They pointed me in the right direction to similar cases. I also learned a lot from Silicon Investor "Investment chat board lawsuits" thread. A lawyer did not write any of my documents or help me in any way.

http://www.marycummins.com/knight_Mcconnel_judge_order.pdf

April 26, 2005. The judge is satisfied with my affidavit. Plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.

http://www.marycummins.com/knight_mcconnell_motion_denied.pdf

Knight-McConnell filed an amended complaint and I replied
http://www.marycummins.com/mary_cummins_reply_to_knight-mcconnel_amended_complaint.pdf

PIKE & FISCHER INTERNET LAW & REGULATION review of case. Note, I never had to pay any fees because the court never had jurisdiction over me. I should have never been served in the first place. The final current docket reflects this. I'm amazed they wrote such a lengthy article about this frivolous case. This was the beginning of internet law so maybe that's it. Or maybe it was because it was a pro se vs a pro se?

http://techlawadvisor.com/docs/knight-mcconnell.pdf

I found my old due diligence page for Kathy. None of the links work. Note, the photo of Kathy in question was posted on the main page of her own website. I added the "toxic funding is awesome!" part, that's it. This is a photo she herself had on the main page of her website.

http://www.marycummins.com/kathy_knight-mcconnel_stock_promoter.html

Mary Cummins wins lawsuit, Los Angeles, California, real estate, Animal Advocates

Mary Cummins wins lawsuit, Los Angeles, California, real estate, Animal Advocates

Mary Cummins wins lawsuit, Los Angeles, California, real estate, Animal Advocates

Mary Cummins wins lawsuit, Los Angeles, California, real estate, Animal Advocates

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html