Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California

Mary Cummins, Real Estate Appraiser, Animal Advocates, Los Angeles, California
WEBSITE       RESUME       CONTACT       FACEBOOK        LINKEDIN       
Showing posts with label fha. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fha. Show all posts

Friday, January 12, 2024

McKissock Learning Will No Longer Offer PAREA Due to Costs by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser

mckissock learning, mckissock,appraisal institute, parea, real estate appraiser, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, training, certified, residential, license, hud, fha
mckissock learning, mckissock,appraisal institute, parea, real estate appraiser, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, training, certified, residential, license, hud, fha

PAREA is the Practical Applications of Real Estate Appraisal. In order to become a licensed appraiser you currently need about a year or two and 1,000-1,500 hours of training experience as a trainee with another licensed and generally certified appraiser. You also need basic classes and other requirements. Because it was so difficult to find mentors willing to train trainees for free the government allowed the PAREA training alternative to hours with a live mentor. Real Estate Appraiser education provider McKissock Learning was going to be one of the government approved companies, organizations offering PAREA training. The Appraisal Institute is another organization offering the training. 

Yesterday January 12, 2024 McKissock emailed people who were interested in the program that they would no longer be offering the PAREA program. See below email.

"Happy New Year to you and yours. We hope this letter finds you well. With a strong commitment to responsibility and transparency, we want to inform you about a significant decision regarding the McKissock PAREA (Practical Applications of Real Estate Appraisal) project.

After careful consideration and thorough evaluation of various factors, we have made the difficult decision to cancel the McKissock PAREA project. We understand that this news may be unexpected, and we want to provide you with a clear understanding of our reasoning and the steps we are taking moving forward.

One of the primary factors contributing to the cancellation is the substantial resource cost required to provide a product of the quality we envisioned. In our pursuit to deliver a premium solution, the associated costs exceeded initial estimates, resulting in a higher-end price to our customers. Regrettably, we recognize that this higher cost would inadvertently create a new barrier to entry into the appraisal profession – specifically, a financial obstacle."

The cost of the program was always a major issue and hurdle to entrance in the field. You couldn't even start the program without first paying for and taking $1,700 worth of McKissock classes. The Appraisal Institute stated the PAREA program would cost about $10,000 per a July 19, 2023 webinar. All of the training would be online. There would be no in person mentorship. 

From a monetary point of view the expensive cost of the training might be a total waste without real mentorship. This is not a trial an error occupation. You need someone training you in the beginning. You won't make any money if you don't know what you're doing. The only people who could end up making money from the training were possibly the training organization. They'd make money from government grants, nonprofit grants and class fees from paying students. It'd be like those worthless online degrees.

Another main problem is the real estate appraisal market today is at its absolute lowest point. There's very little lending work. The main cause is our current high interest rates. No one is selling if they have to buy another home. Why lose a 2.5% interest rate and triple your monthly mortgage at 7.5% or so. No one would want to refinance for the same reason. Sales volume is at its lowest in about 20 years per Ryan Lundquist's fantastic statistics. I've seen the same in Los Angeles, California.

Another even bigger issue is the use of live appraisers has been decreasing recently because of appraisal waivers, AVMs (Automated Valuation Methods) and hybrid type appraisals. Even though a live appraiser is used for part of the hybrid appraisal they aren't being paid as much as a full appraisal, i.e. $75-$165 vs $300-$500. The few full inspection appraisals done by live appraisers are very complex appraisals which only appraisers with many years experience are allowed to do. There's just not as much work today for anyone.

Previously the government said there were not enough appraisers and now there are definitely way too many. If you look at Facebook appraiser groups, everyone is hurting. Many have retired or had to get side gigs. If a fully trained and experienced appraiser of 20 years can't get work, a newbie has no chance at making enough money to survive. Even people with 20-40 years of experience are quitting due to lack of work.

You'd have to really be an idiot to shell out $1,700 for basic classes, $10,000 for PAREA, $6,000 appraisal costs first year just to make no money. Few can afford that upfront cost even if they could make the money back in a year or two. Another huge hurdle is lenders only use appraisers with three years minimum experience. No one would hire you fresh out of PAREA. 

I believe that McKissock realized there probably won't be enough people willing to pay for the classes at the moment to justify their training costs. They couldn't make enough profit off the program today. Even if the government and nonprofits offered grants to pay for the training the students probably wouldn't get any work from the program. No one would be happy. There would be a lot of online complaints.

I'm actually glad McKissock is not continuing with the program at this time for the sake of the potential new appraisers. Now is not the time to start out as an appraiser because of the market conditions. I would at a minimum wait until things rebound when rates go down. Maybe by then there will be an affordable PAREA program maybe subsidized by the government for people who can't afford it. You'd still need live experience and will have to deal with all the other issues noted above but it'd be better than what we have today. 

*FTR I've been taking classes with McKissock since they first started around 1990. Back in the day they only offered in person classes taught by the McKissock's out of a small classroom in Orange County, California. Today I take bundled classes with Calypso because they're cheaper. 


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Thursday, July 20, 2023

PAREA Update from David Samnick - Practical Applications of Real Estate Appraisal , comment by Mary Cummins

parea, practical applications of real estate appraisal, mary cummins, real estate appraiser, real estate appraisal, los angeles, california, hud, ai, appraisal institute, mckissock, aqb, Appraiser Qualifications Board, mentor, trainee, license, certified residential, 

I haven't been following PAREA as closely as I should have but thankfully appraiser David Samnick has been following it. He attended an Appraisal Institute meeting yesterday about the program. It's disheartening to say the least. The purpose of PAREA was to make it easier, cheaper and faster for new appraisers to get the training and hours of real life experience they need to get their license. A main purpose was to help diversify appraisers by making it cheaper and getting rid of the mandatory mentor/trainee. Lower income people can't work as a trainee for free for two years. I wrote a few articles about this huge obstacle to getting a license. Here's one from June 2021. https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/06/difficulties-becoming-real-estate.html

This post below by David Samnick makes it clear that AI and others such as McKissock have used the issue of diversity just to line their pockets with money. The Appraisal Institute, McKissock make money selling education hours to appraisers. AI got a grant from the government to work on PAREA. May 18, 2023, the AQB approved the first PAREA program, belonging to the Appraisal Institute (AI). I wish I were wealthy and retired so I could train people for free. I'd only train POC if that were legal and not discriminatory.

"Practical Applications of Real Estate Appraisal (PAREA) is a program that aims to revolutionize the real estate industry by increasing the number of appraisers. However, after listening to the Appraisal Institute speaker at yesterdays board meeting it quickly became evident that this initiative is a complete failure.

A) You cannot start PAREA until you have received all your real estate appraisal education. 94 hours = $1,700 per McKissock

B) Appraisal Institute speaker said that most AMC's/banks won't accept licensed appraisers work so he suggests going the CR route. Cost to become a CR appraiser through PAREA - $10,000

C) PAREA is a complete online course. Zero mentorship in the real world. No physical measuring. No driving. No real time experience. No true mentorship.

D) No discussion with the PAREA student about the pay to play. Multiple MLS services, E&O insurance, business expenses, accounting, appraisal software, computers, reliable transportation, and other miscellaneous expenses. Total costs can exceed $6,000 per year.

E) The Appraisal Institute said that this would increase diversity into the appraisal field yet could not tell us the breakdown of how many applicants were minorities.

F) PAREA graduates will be scooped up by AMCS to sign off on Hybrid reports performed by third party data collectors.

G) PAREA graduates have no geographic competence.

H) Total cost for PAREA at the end of the day = $17,700 and potentially more.

 

The Average Joes argued several points in the board meeting.

A) A graduate of the PAREA course would be paid and treated like a trainee as they have no real-world experience.

B) We could have more appraisers back into the industry if banks/amcs would allow appraisers to use their trainees.

C) Reinstate Licensed appraisers to be able to mentor new trainees. This would introduce the next generation of appraisers into the business.

D) Petition FHA to reinstate any licensed appraiser who took the FHA course and had to pass the test.

E) More appraisers would hire trainees if the AMC model wasn't taking so much money out of the pockets of working appraisers. Work is slow. Most have the mentality that my bills come before your bills.

 

In closing PAREA launched in 2019. And the program has not been successful in diversifying the appraisal profession. In fact, a study by the Appraiser Qualifications Board found that the PAREA program has had a negative impact on diversity in the appraisal profession.

The study found that the PAREA program is disproportionately used by white appraisers. In fact, white appraisers are more than twice as likely to use the PAREA program than minority appraisers. The study also found that the PAREA program is not as effective in providing a more accessible pathway to licensure as the traditional apprenticeship model."

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7087764386198556672/

Below was stated May 2023 by AI. “Market research has shown that value proposition—what PAREA is worth to someone in the marketplace—is around $5,000,” DiBiaso said. “Our pricing strategy may be different than that and include scholarships and discounts and payment plans. We have a commitment to The Appraisal Foundation that we will give preference of our scholarships to minorities, veterans, and people who indicate a willingness to serve in rural areas. The scholarships will come from a number of different sources including AI.” 

McKissock stated their program will be ready June 2023. “We are investing heavily in the technology tools that appraisers use,” Nancy Gerome said, McKissock’s appraisal general manager. “Our hope is to have them consistently trained. You’ll get all different types of properties and scenarios because we’re leaning into the technology and experience. We’re trying to be thorough, that’s why we’re taking our time. We want to get it right.”  

McKissock staff is preparing their launch to accommodate thousands of trainees, over a staggered period. They estimate the average time a person will take to complete the program is six months. The cost for participating is not yet determined. Staff did confirm there will be a “buy now, pay later” option, as well as scholarships.  

“We are building a scholarship program because we know one of the goals of PAREA is to bring diversity into the profession, and we want to make it as affordable as we can,” Gerome said. Those interested in participating in a PAREA program of either McKissock or AI need to have already completed their Qualifying Education. "

Clearly when the government said there was a probably with diversity among real estate appraisers and the government would give money to help diversify appraisers all these companies heard was MONEY. They will just be training more appraisers for more money and the appraisers will probably all still be mainly older white men. 

Appraisal Institute talks about grants and scholarships for POC and women all the time. I tried to apply and they said I have to pay to join their organization before they'd even talk about it. What if I had no qualifications or were denied? I'd be out the membership fee which is not cheap. It normally costs $15,000 to become an AI MAI appraiser even though I have 40 years of experience and have taken every publicly available real estate appraisal class in existence over the last 40 years. This is clearly a racket when you consider the government gave them money for the program. Gate keeping with a membership fee to the Appraisal Institute before you can access government funding.


Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Thursday, February 3, 2022

Interview President Appraisal Institute Jody Bishop by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaFfhOo1Edk&t=1830s

"Today’s (February 2, 2022) Buzzcast interview is with Jody Bishop, the new President of The Appraisal Institute. We sat down with Jody and Joan Trice, Founder of Allterra Group, LLC to discuss what the outlook for the Appraisal Institute is for 2022 and what appraisers can expect from their initiatives."

You can go to the video, click the three dots bottom right then view the transcript. Joan Trice JT asked the questions and Jody Bishop JB replied. Below are my notes.

JB: The AI Board couldn't get together until May for a few reasons I won't mention. We used a consultant to handle the meeting to be neutral. We have five top priorities: modernizing education and production, new technology and social media, develop plan to recruit and retain professionals, implement PAREA and develop diversity equity and inclusion action plan. It's time to work to meet our goals. We need a cultural shift to refuse other ideas so we can finish the top 2, 3 or 5 goals. Then we'll be successful.

JT: What about the diversity program?

JB: We already have some effort with the appraisal diversity initiative ADI. Someone gave $3M to the program for the next three years. The National Urban League held symposium to recruit women and POC. We gave grants for initial licensed education, textbook. We started a women's initiative committee a while back. Hope to have a plan by Q3. 

JT: Will AI be matching candidates with supervisors? 

They will take an AI class. We're working on PAREA. AI was given/gave? $500K to write a program on producing PAREA. We will have students do a robust case study. It will take them through an appraisal of a house. We will have mentors going through the program. They should be highly trained after process. (They will do only one home appraisal? Maybe they need to at least do one home, one condo, one 2-4 units?)

Commercial by AI. Become a member today! :-D Their membership has gone from 25,000 to 17,000 today. They've lost almost 30% of their members while their salaries, expenses and travel expenses have increased.

JT: What is your personal agenda, strategic plan?

JB: I have to give board information they need to make decisions. I have to make sure they don't get distracted with other items. We're working through a cultural shift. Other goals are better communication and messaging. 

JT: There is the clear report, appraisal subcommittee report, review of USPAP, Fannie Mae just launched their study on racial bias, PAVE report coming any minute. Any thoughts where PAVE will come down?

JB. We met with PAVE folks. We arranged for drive-by appraisal ride-along. They watched appraiser measure property. It was helpful for them. We're trying to educate these folks about what appraisers really do. They're discovering there's more to it than just the appraiser running amok out there. All these reports of appraisals but we don't have enough information to see what is really going on. We have a team that has studied various reports, Andre Perry's, Freddie Mac, AIE report. We're looking at Fannie Mae report. We looked at appraisal gap in Freddie Mac report. (He summarized their report per FM). FM looked at refinances.They compared appraisals to avm values. It really wasn't undervaluation going on. Maybe there was renovation work in white areas? They're going to look more. 

We're trying to educate about history of diversity, redlining, restrictive covenants... It's helpful to learn what happened in the past to understand the concerns today. 

PAVE will come out in a week or so. Clear study, ASC, looking at Appraisal Foundation as well. The most glaring thing is wanting to allow appraiser to be liable to the borrower. It makes me nervous too.

Commercial.  LiDar measurement. Remote evaluations. incenteram.com

JT: Should the borrower be intended user of report?

JB: It's concerning. You can be sued no matter what disclaimer is in the report (who is the intended user). It gives borrower power to go after appraiser. If we start adding onerous new regulations, liability, it could dissuade new appraisers. 

JT: You can't serve two masters. We don't give them cover to tell the truth. If the appraiser says property in bad condition, lender would put pressure on appraiser not to be honest. The borrower would be angry if appraiser is honest. If it's a hoarder house and appraiser states that, borrower would be insulted.

JB: We should not have flag words (such as hoarder). That's why codes Q, C are better. C4 is not hoarder. Your camera can take 1000 pics. Photos can save you the heartache. 

JT: I'm a fan of transparency but would be better for borrower to get a summary of report but not the report with the UAD codes which they don't understand. 

JB: Hybrids. The appraiser would not be influenced by anyone at the house. Appraisers don't see the borrower at purchase appraisal but may at refinance appraisal inspection. With hybrid there is no connection between appraiser and borrower. The gold standard for appraisal is full inspection, drive the neighborhood, see the comps themselves. That is the argument against AVMs. There is a push to AVM but want to enhance it somehow. The best thing to happen to appraisers is the Zillow news that AVMs are not accurate. The Zillow (failure) was great timing for the PAVE report, Joe Biden team weighing in. 

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin DISCLAIMER: https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/p/disclaimer-privacy-policy-for-blogs-by.html

Saturday, November 6, 2021

Why Real Estate Appraisers Blur Photos in Appraisals by Mary Cummins Real Estate Appraiser


"A former Green Beret and one-time congressional candidate arrested last month for his alleged participation in the Capitol riot was illegally stockpiling explosives prior to being jailed on charges related to the Jan. 6 pro-Trump siege, according to an FBI search warrant filed Friday in Washington, D.C. federal court. When federal agents searched 47-year-old Jeremy Brown’s Florida home in October, they reported finding a short-barrel rifle, a sawed-off shotgun, more than 8,000 rounds of ammunition, and two hand grenades. But it was a picture included in a sales listing for his house on Zillow that led to his latest troubles. In a photo from “what appears to be Brown’s office,” FBI agents spotted a whiteboard with columns labeled “Food,” “Clothing,” “Shelter,” “Currency,” “Communicate,” “Move,” and “Shoot,” the warrant states. In the “shoot” column, it continues, “there are numerous firearms listed and explosive devices such as ‘flash bangs.’” The entry on the whiteboard indicated that Brown had the flash bangs “on hand,” the filing says, adding that Brown “is not registered to possess explosive devices.” "



In this case a real estate agent or maybe just a photographer did not blur any photos or remove items in the listing of a home for sale on Zillow. This was not for an appraisal or loan. While real estate agents cannot discriminate I don't believe Zillow or the agent have a responsibility to blur out images of personal items in listing photos so others can't discriminate. I do know that real estate agents generally tell all of their clients to remove all items of a personal nature especially photos for the listing photos and showings if not until the home is sold. This is for staging purposes so the buyer can envision themselves in a clean and less cluttered home so the home will sell more quickly and for a higher price.  

Appraisers on the other hand have to blur out photos of all people and personal items. We blur out people in photos, people in paintings, any religious items, personal collections such as gun collections, yard signs, political signs and other items of a personal nature in the home. 

I would have blurred out the guns but probably not the list of items on the wall because I wouldn't have noticed it. I don't really look at personal items when I'm appraising as I'm concentrating on the structure. I only notice the photos when I'm writing the report and adding the photos. Then I intentionally look for anything personal so I can blur it. I would assume that someone would hide something they really, really don't want anyone to see in their home before they enter. I'm assuming the guy just didn't realize people would know who he was and put two and two together. 

The purpose of blurring images of all people, religious items ... is so no one can say that the lender's decision to loan or not to loan was based on discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, marital status.... Appraisers are also not allowed to discriminate against the home owner, borrower, or state anything that might be considered discriminatory in the appraisal report. There is no law that states Appraisers have to remove or blur these items. It's the lender instructions to the Appraiser. Obviously we see the images and items and sometimes people in person so blurring them from photos won't remove them from our memory.

I found this regulation about discrimination in relation to lenders. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits discrimination in any aspect of a credit transaction. It's based on Fair Lending Laws and Regulations per the Fair Housing Act. The link below goes into more detail about fair lending and discrimination.

https://www.fdic.gov/resources/supervision-and-examinations/consumer-compliance-examination-manual/documents/4/iv-1-1.pdf

The reason for blurring the photos is because the lender does not want a discrimination complaint or lawsuit even a frivolous one. If the lender is a bank it's even more important. Banks have to comply with many complex regulations related to non-discrimination of borrowers. They must have so many branches in areas which are predominantly low income and of color if they want to operate a bank even if the branches lose money. One complaint even a frivolous could harm the bank's legal standing as a bank and it's reputation and business. 

The alleged January 6 rioter appears to be a not too bright criminal. I've found people who believe in conspiracy theories such as the "stolen" 2020 election, Pizzagate, JFK is still alive, are not the sharpest tools in the shed. They lack critical thinking and common sense which is a shame for everyone.

Mary Cummins of Cummins Real Estate is a certified residential licensed appraiser in Los Angeles, California. Mary Cummins is licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate appraisers and has over 35 years of experience.


Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary, Cummins, #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit real estate, appraiser, appraisal, instructor, teacher, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Brentwood, Bel Air, California, licensed, permitted, certified, single family, condo, condominium, pud, hud, fannie mae, freddie mac, fha, uspap, certified, residential, certified resident, apartment building, multi-family, commercial, industrial, expert witness, civil, criminal, orea, dre, brea insurance, bonded, experienced, bilingual, spanish, english, form, 1004, 2055, 1073, land, raw, acreage, vacant, insurance, cost, income approach, market analysis, comparative, theory, appraisal theory, cost approach, sales, matched pairs, plot, plat, map, diagram, photo, photographs, photography, rear, front, street, subject, comparable, sold, listed, active, pending, expired, cancelled, listing, mls, multiple listing service, claw, themls, historical appraisal, facebook, linkedin

Friday, August 6, 2021

First Interagency Task Force Meeting on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) - PROBLEMS, by Mary Cummins

pave task force, hud, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, bias, discrimination, value, valuation, loans, fha, joe biden, white house, marsha fudge, meeting
pave task force, hud, mary cummins, real estate appraisal, bias, discrimination, value, valuation, loans, fha, joe biden, white house, marsha fudge, meeting

The first White House Interagency Task Force Meeting on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) was August 5, 2021. "Task Force members discussed how current appraisal practices are a significant contributor to the disparity in housing values. The practice of comparing properties within similar neighborhoods can be a proxy for racial demographics, which leads to the perpetuation and exacerbation of the legacy of segregation and redlining."

Racism exists. We should do everything we can to fight it. I fully support helping people of color  buy and maintain homes. I've studied segregation, redlining and their effects on community. That said doing away with the main valuation method of assets used around the world would be ridiculous and destroy the economy and our government.

Matched pairs analysis is how ALL assets in the world have been valued since the beginning of civilization. It's how all real and personal property are valued, traded, insured, assessed for taxation purposes, bought, sold, used for loan collateral, used as a basis to settle court disputes... The government is the one who mandated that real estate appraisers compare like to most similar like. It's also called the sales comparison approach. 

The purpose of the sales comparison approach using matched pairs analysis is to provide the "most accurate scientific measure of value." "The major supposition of the sales comparison approach is that market value of the subject is related to comparable property values within the same market area." This is how real estate agents and sellers determine a list price for a property. It's also how agents and buyers determine an offer price for the property. This is how the tax assessor assesses your property for taxation purposes. The sales comparison approach is the most accurate method to value homes for many purposes.

Based on what has been said by the Task Force members so far I am betting that they want appraisers to use only HIGHER sold comparables from areas with more valuable homes to appraise lower valued homes in areas with a higher percentage of POC. I am assuming this will only be for government and government insured appraisals, loans for POC but am not certain if it will be for everyone in certain areas of lower valued homes. Private banks and lenders would never go for this. Everyone knows the value of property is based on three main things, location, location, location. There are clearly major problems with this approach.

The actual value of property. "The fair market value is the price a home would sell for on the open market under normal conditions." Even if the government forces appraisers to use sold comparables from homes in Beverly Hills to appraise homes in East Los Angeles that will never fool home buyers or sellers. If you want to buy, can afford to buy a $100,000 home, you will look at homes for sale around that price range in an area you like. You buy the home with $10,000 down. It appraises at $100,000 which is market value determined by an appraiser. You get sick, lose your job, sell your home or lose it in foreclosure. It sells for $100,000 and the $90,000 loan is paid off. 

Let's say instead you offered $100,000 on a home with $10,000 down payment but the appraiser said it was actually worth only $50,000. If you buy it for $50,000, you're okay. Instead you demand another appraisal using sold comps in a more valuable area maybe a beach front property to appraise a tear down shack in Pacoima. The next appraisal is $100,000. You again get sick...You couldn't sell it for more than $50,000 or were foreclosed upon. The bank just lost $40,000 which you now owe to the bank even though you have no home. Many of these loans are backed by the government. The government aka the taxpayer loses that money. The banks and government are in trouble when this happens to many people like it did during the Great Recession of 2008. We are at a home price peak so this is a major concern.

I bring up this example because this would be mortgage fraud. The appraiser and lender would be complicit. This actually happened and people were criminally convicted of fraud. One such case was Victor Noval who defrauded the US Government HUD of $60,000,000 in this scheme. They used HUD money to buy property whose value was inflated by a con artist appraiser using higher sold comparables in other superior areas and other tricks. HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo stated in response to this crime in 1997 per the Los Angeles Times "Any con artist who tries to rip off HUD and the American taxpayer will be caught and prosecuted to the full extent of the law." The taxpayer ends up paying for any loss in government backed loans. Any program to artificially inflate the value of homes to secure government insured funding would be bank fraud and fraud against the government.  For the government itself to suggest these federal crimes is ludicrous! 

Another thing to consider is that lenders make the loans then sell them so they can use that money to make more loans. No one would buy the loans if there is no market value appraisal. No one would know what they are worth except less than the loan amount. They'd sell at a huge discount if they could be sold at all. Investors also bundle these bank and government insured loans as mortgage backed securities and sell them in the secondary market to pension funds, investment funds... Again, what are they worth? We have no idea because there is no appraisal of its real market value. Generally investors look at market value of the property, loan to value ratios, loan balances, rates, equity, payment history, loan delinquency rate ... to determine value of the investment. No one would invest in these loans if they have no idea what they are worth. That's money lost for new home loans. Now new home buyers can't buy homes. You just shot yourself in the foot.

Let's say investors invest in these loans anyway and the economy flounders. People are foreclosed upon and lose their homes which sell for less than the loan balances. The banks and government lose money on the loans. Homeowners still owe the balance of the unpaid loans. The mortgage backed securities also sell on the stock market causing the stock market to dump. This happened in the Great Recession when all those loans went south. The banks and Wall Street had to be bailed out. Government then had to develop new regulations to make sure this wouldn't happen again. Here's an idea. How about not starting new programs which set homeowners, banks, investors, taxpayers and the government up for failure from the start. 

What if POC in areas with mainly POC get a higher appraisal and then a larger loan using this new appraisal method? Do you raise their tax assessment value and taxes? That would raise the property taxes of neighbors pushing out poor and elderly people. Because home value correlates with home rent it would also raise corresponding rent of non owners who would have to move. Can wealthy people use this same new appraisal method to lower the value of their property to pay less property tax, give their spouse less in a divorce settlement or give the government less in capital gains taxes? What happens when POC get a bigger loan because of the higher appraisal but they can't afford to make the payments and lose their home? That happened during the Great Recession when home values appreciated quickly for real. While members of the Task Force stated POC would take that new make believe home equity money and invest in college educations, new businesses, health care, home improvement or retirement accounts to improve their financial situation and the community they invested in personal items instead. Our nation is still recovering from the Great Recession. This new appraisal method would open up an economic Pandora's Box while home prices and real home equity are already increasing rapidly. 

The Task Force has 180 days to come up with a real plan. I hope someone who knows something about real estate appraisal, investments, loans and the economy speaks up before then. If not, it's the home buyers, home owners, banks, government and taxpayers who will be hurt by this mess of an idea. 

#pavetaskforce #hud #realestateappraisal #bias #discrimination #value #valuation #homeloans #loans #fha #joebiden #whitehouse #marciafudge #meeting #August52021   #PropertyAppraisalandValuationEquity #PAVE #segregation #redlining #racial #occ #ftc #fdic #cfpb #fhfa #asc #susanrice 

The rest of the press release is below. It's also linked.

"The group identified near- and long-term opportunities to advance equity in home appraisals that will help narrow the racial wealth gap and reinvest in communities that have been historically left behind. The Task Force Members will work together and consult with civil rights organizations, advocacy groups, industry, and philanthropic entities to drive change.

Additionally, Task Force members agreed that the scope of the Task Force will be to:

Ensure that government oversight and industry practice further valuation equity;

Combat valuation bias through educating the consumer and training the practitioner;

Ensure equity in valuation by making available high-quality data;

Create a comprehensive approach to combating valuation bias through enforcement and other efforts.

The Task Force is chaired by Secretary Fudge and Ambassador Rice, and includes cabinet-level leaders from executive departments and additional members from independent agencies. The Task Force will deliver a final action report within 180 days.

The Task Force membership is comprised of the following officials: (I added their names)

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (co-chair) Marcia Fudge

Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy (co-chair) Susan Rice

Director of the National Economic Council Brian Deese

Attorney General of the United States Merrick Garland

Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack

Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh

Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona

Secretary of Veterans Affairs Denis McDonough

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Michael Hsu

Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell

Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Lina Khan

Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Jelena McWilliams

Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Todd M Harper

Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Dave Uejio

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Sandra L Thompson

Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) James Park

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/05/readout-of-the-first-interagency-task-force-meeting-on-property-appraisal-and-valuation-equity-pave

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Home Appraisal Bias Event - Consumer Finance Protection Bureau - Meeting - Real Estate Appraisal - by Mary Cummins

home appraisal bias event, consumer finance protection bureau, hud, mary cummins, fha, real estate appraisal, discrimination
home appraisal bias event, consumer finance protection bureau, hud, mary cummins, fha, real estate appraisal, discrimination

Today August 3, 2021 I just heard about this meeting. As a certified licensed real estate appraiser on the Federal approved real estate appraiser list I was not notified about the meeting which is why I didn't see it live. Stakeholders should be notified of these meetings. They should also have a real estate appraiser on the panel for many reasons. The people on the panel were missing key information and insight about the main issues. 

My notes are within the meeting agenda outline. I haven't watched the second half yet but I will. The second half has to do with civil rights issues. I've already seen part of that presentation from one speaker. Below is a link to the two hour video. My personal comments are in ( ). 

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/events/archive-past-events/virtual-home-appraisal-bias-event/

"We held a virtual event on Tuesday, June 15th, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. EDT for virtual discussions on home appraisal bias. Acting Director Dave Uejio hosted discussions with civil rights organizations, housing policy experts, and other federal agencies to explore how racial bias in housing appraisals and automated valuation models may occur."

01:00 PM – 01:06 PM Welcome, Federal Agency Panel and Acting Director Introductions Alicia Criado Hampshire, Public Engagement

01:07 PM – 01:10 PM Opening Remarks Acting Director Dave Uejio

Dave Uejio: The Appraisal Institute said it's a growing problem in the industry. San Francisco couple who got rid of black photos, items in their home received $500K higher appraisal. (That case had to do with other issues which were not discrimination, see here https://mary--cummins.blogspot.com/2021/02/alleged-discrimination-home-appraisal.html) Extreme example but underscores example of home appraisal bias. 

Appraisals are imprecise. A low appraisal makes comparable homes value lower. (Wrong. Low sales prices would do that, not appraisals). Biden said he'll take action. I am focusing on long standing inequities. (He read his entire report) We will have experts and federal agency partners and discussions with consumer rights leaders and consumer advocates. 

01:11 PM – 01:12 PM Research Presenter Introductions Alicia Criado Hampshire, Public Engagement

Introduces Michael Neal and Jim Park. 

01:13 PM – 01:23 PM Presentation on the Urban Institute’s research on Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) Michael Neal, Senior Research Associate, Housing Finance Policy Center, Urban Institute

Michael Neal: AVMs (Automated Valuation Methods). They disproportionately affect black neighborhoods. AVM as a substitution for and compliment to in person appraisals. Appraisers contributed to the 2008 real estate bust and great recession (FALSE. That was lenders giving loans to people regardless of their ability to pay them back) Appraisers have a role in perpetuating racial inequities and a role in perpetuating the pandemic. (Even the pandemic now? WTH?!) We can eliminate, reduce racial disparity by using AVMs. We looked at three ways to determine inaccuracy in avms. AVMs are far off the real value of homes (How do they know what is the "real value?"). We compared inaccuracy of black to white areas in three cities, Atlanta, Memphis and Washington DC.

White and black areas both look the same with avms in terms of inaccuracy. The magnitude of inaccuracy is greater in white areas than black (Magnitude is error rate x value). We compared to underlying home value. The percent magnitude of inaccuracy is greater in black vs white areas. (It's not color but home value ranges. As Zillow representative responded in another meeting there is more inaccuracy on the tail end of the value ranges i.e. very low. Lower priced homes are also in poorer condition. They're generally older. There is less data in poor areas so not as accurate). We try to explain via regression analysis via four factors, property differences, neighborhood conditions, turnover rate and majority of black vs white. More turnover increases avm accuracy. (More turnovers, more data, makes sense!) The percent majority race of the neighborhood is statistically significant (because POC tend to own lower priced homes). AVMs shouldn't be aware of race but they are. (No. It's because POC tend to own lower priced homes. More error in lower priced homes due to condition, lack of data. Zillow stated this and I agree). 

Ways to invest in black communities. Black banks and improve home condition. Need more data to determine condition better. A too low estimate can threaten home purchase. Contact me. (His read his report) (Here is a link to the underlying paper His paper confirmed what I stated above. There is more error in low priced homes. "Majority-Black neighborhoods tend to have lower home values, more heterogeneous properties, higher shares of distressed home sales and gentrified neighborhoods, and lower household incomes. All these factors are associated with a greater magnitude of percentage error in AVM estimations." His paper confirmed that AVMs value white and black owned homes the same. They have the same amount of error. This is the opposite of what Andre Perry stated. Andre Perry also used AVMs. Neal and Perry are both black. The areas aren't 100% black. Poor whites, browns are also affected by AVM data.)

01:24 PM – 01:34 PM Overview of ASC’s role in appraisals and D&I efforts Jim Park, Executive Director, Appraisal Subcommittee, Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council

Jim Park OSC: Bias is an important issue. Appraisal regulatory system. Three main components, states, federal and private sectors. Federal carries out licensing, discipline. Appraisal Foundation has two boards, ASB, AQB. They set USPAP and minimum requirements to be an appraiser. ASC is Federal government. Maintain national registry of appraisers and AMCs. 

ASC member agencies. Slides.




Diversity equity inclusion. I am concerned with  reports of alleged racial bias in appraisals and lack of diversity in the profession. Recent allegation of racial bias and lack of diversity. We must regain public trust. ASC has initiatives to review bias, review of USPAP and credentialing of appraisers. We will be hosting roundtables on bias. Appraisers and Assessors are 96% white, 70% men. I find it deeply disturbing (Jim Park is a white male, see pic above). 

Lack of new appraisers. In the past 10-12 years 20-25% decline in national registry. Aging population, declining numbers, and few new entrants while demand increases. One reason is supervisor trainee model which is the only way to become appraiser, by the apprenticeship model. Generally this is only family members. (My article about the problem with the program with solutions) This contributed to lack of diversity. We're working on an alternative but nothing yet. We are doing research to figure this out and find solutions. HR 2553 would establish inter agency task force to analysis federal underwriting standards and guidance to increase diversity in appraisers. Need study our entire industry. (He read his report).

01:35 PM – 02:05 PM Federal Agency Panel Discussion, acting director. 

Todd Harper. NCUA,  National Credit Union Administration. Appraisal bias is important to explore. Must close the wealth gap (for POC). Purchasing home is one of three major ways (other two are starting a business and retirement savings accounts). Dodd Frank Act 2010 reforms. I've been reading news accounts of bias. Existing statutes, the FHA need to address the problem. We need to enforce. Quality control standards for AVMs were supposed to have been made. Formulas can be garbage in, garbage out. Need good quality data going in to get good quality results. (AVMs use like kind appraisal method used for centuries all over the world choosing most similar sold homes for comparison. It's the main asset valuation method similar to Kelly Blue Book car value system. This is what appraisers use.)

Lender owns the appraisal though consumer pays for it. Consumer needs new appraisal to go to a different lender. Consumer should own so can shop appraisal and loan with another lender. (He read his report. Appraisals can currently be transferred from one lender to another with an appraisal transfer letter that references Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC), Appraiser Independence Requirements (AIR) and FHA Guidelines  regarding appraiser independence (ML 09‐28) . Ask for the letter.) 

Michael Hsu, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). We must remove structural obstacles. Need access to affordable housing. Lower appraisal value suppresses property tax and money to education. (Lower sales prices do that, not appraisals). It can negatively affect wealth for minorities. Homes in black neighborhoods are worth 1/2 homes in white neighborhoods (FALSE! He cited statistically flawed Andre Perry report. Even Perry said 23% even though it's zero). $156B loss in value nation wide per Brookings Institute (FALSE! Andre Perry's report is statistically flawed and therefore meaningless. He is not the institute but one person who wrote a paper that was not peer reviewed. There was no legitimate research involved but cherry picked numbers from flawed comparisons of two small very different groups chosen by one person. He did not compare similar homes in similar areas.)

We must hold banks accountable but need collective effort. I applaud civil rights leaders for holding us accountable. There is 11 trillion in mortgage loans in the US. 

McCargo, HUD Director for Marsha Fudge. On behalf of Fudge and HUD, thanks. Growing number of reports of bias in the media. Reports of discrimination have increased 10x since 2019. This includes lenders, lending requirements and the lack of diversity of appraisers. Over 85% are white, less than 2% black. Joe Biden told Fudge to lead the task force to address inequities for POC. It will include federal regulators and agencies. Will assess extent, causes, effect and recommend actions. We will engage stakeholders who have information (but not real estate appraisers or people in the actual industry for some reason). June is homeownership month. 

McCargo: News stories. There's a new one a week. There's a wealth and homeownership gap. 

Todd: This isn't a new issue. People fleeing Poconos from NY paid more than what homes were worth. The credit union must meet needs of all even poorer people. Need to help POC access and build wealth to overcome racism over time. We need to diversify appraisers and regulate AVMs. 

ASC: Black homeowners thinking they must "de black" their home is heartbreaking. The idea the tactics work is frustrating. (They don't work. See articles on three main incidents of alleged racism in real estate appraisals which showed the original appraisal values were correct. Two of them didn't "de black" the home. Article 1. Article 2. Article 3. ) The heart of appraisal is objectivity and independence. The (color of the) owner has nothing to do with opinion of value. People must report any perceived discrimination by appraisers to state departments. If they are discriminating, they are violating USPAP and should be disciplined. 

Todd: ASC hotline? 

ASC: Hotline refers users to proper department. 

Hsu: Not a new problem just more awareness from media articles. This puts an urgency on the issue. It's great all agencies are working together on this. 

Dave Uejio: Difficult for consumers to discern discrimination. (Consumers think any appraisal which is lower than what they personally want is "discrimination.") What is contributing to this problem is impacting valuation in communities. 

McCargo: Real estate is local. We should focus on state and local levels. How diverse can we get the industry. 

Jim ASC: Fed and states set requirements. States can exceed federal levels. Need more diversity on state appraisal boards. Needs more minorities. Only Alabama requires it. Appraisals result in a one point value. Not how the market works. (Yes, it is. A buyer only pays one price for a property. That is "market value." Our appraisal actually includes a range of values if someone on the panel had ever seen one) Market reflects a range. (As a whole but not for the specific property which will be secured by a loan backed by the federal government and resold as an investment). Maybe appraisers should do that. It might help lending process. (Lenders would refuse as the loans could not be guaranteed or resold as investments). We should provide more data such as GSEs (Government Sponsored Enterprise  is a quasi-governmental entity established to enhance the flow of credit to specific sectors of the American economy. Created by acts of Congress, these agencies–although they are privately-held–provide public financial services. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac). If more data made available to appraisers, consumers, might work as check and balance. Make it more difficult to allow intentional and unintentional bias to creep in. (Might be invasion of privacy to share what someone's home appraisal especially if it includes the appraisal which shows interior photos. Public records do show new loans.).

Dave Uejio: What do you think the bureau should be doing about this? 

McCargo: Awareness has gone a long way. Increase in complaints last couple of years (caused by the rising market and not necessarily discrimination). People are learning what it is. Better data collection to better inform. GSEs have lots of data. Need to make it more visible. 

(? speaker): AVMs are playing a huge role today. GSEs use them for appraisal waivers. Not a panacea but based on historic data and unresolved issues. We should promote research on AVMs  to determine risk, error. (There are risk and error scores posted with values, value ranges with most AVMs. Some like CoreLogic won't post an AVM if they feel risk, error too high due to lack of data). Need certification for AVMs. Maybe make publicly available the algorithm so all can use. (Any appraiser can tell you the algorithm. It's not a secret. See below*)

Mike Todd: Need to work on AVMs and consumer education. Federal appraisal law and oversight of private lending. Look at some states' laws on bias to get the best ideas for federal standards and regulations. Federal transaction levels are $400,000. In 1989 it was $10,000. Higher threshold doesn't protect people who buy cheaper homes as well.

Hsu: Office of the Currency. Stories are anecdotal but need research to back it up. (YES! The media stories are not only anecdotal but the three main ones are FALSE. The government should do independent research on alleged bias. Mike Neal already did and he said there's no difference in appraising based on AVM values between white and black neighborhoods. Andre Perry's report is based on the same AVM values). 

I'll post notes from the civil rights discussion later.

*The appraisal value algorithm. Appraisers use matched pairs analysis to value homes. We compare the subject property to the most similar recently sold nearby homes with the same amenities which sold on the open market in armslength transactions. We give more weight to the more similar home sales. We don't use averages, means or median prices. While we include properties which are listed and not sold we don't give them as much weight. We actually do give a value range via the comps we use. We are generally limited by the unadjusted highest most recent similar sold price. We must use sold comparables that bracket the most important features which are size, bed/bath count. 

The appraiser searches properties which are +/- 15% difference in gross living area within a half a mile radius which sold on the open market within the last three months. We go wider if there aren't enough comparables. We need at least three sold comps, one pending and one listed. We then choose the most similar recent comparables to the subject.

Next we adjust for differences between the subject and the comparables. If one has three beds and another has two, we figure out the value of the third bedroom via regression analysis. We basically search sold homes which are similar in every way except the bed count. The difference in the three bed verses two bed home sales should be the value of the extra bedroom. 

After we make the adjustments for all differences we have a range of adjusted and unadjusted values for all the comparables. The home sales that are the most similar carry the most weight. If we were appraising average newer tract homes which are identical there should be very little variation in values. Appraisers are extremely happy when we don't have to make any or at least not many adjustments. This generally only happens to me with newer average sized identical condos. 

That's the home value formula the AVMs use though it's not in the form of a mathematical equation. I've written real estate value math equations for my HP12C. Maybe I'll write a simple one and post it here. I've mainly written appreciation, leveraged value, return on value...equations. 

#homeappraisalbiasevent #consumerfinanceprotectionbureau #realestateappraisal #discrimination #marycummins #cfpb #daveuejio #aliciacriado #michaelneal #jimpark #toddharper #alannamccargo #michaelhsu #asc #asb #aqb #uspap #avm #losangeles #california #realestateappraiser #hud #fha #officeofthecurrency #nationalcreditunionadministration #ncua

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Who oversees, regulates Real Estate Appraisers in the US? The Federal and State governments. by Mary Cummins

real estate appraiser, regulation, firrea, mary cummins, los angeles, california, real estate appraisal, hud, fha, appraisal foundation
real estate appraiser, regulation, firrea, mary cummins, los angeles, california, real estate appraisal, hud, fha, appraisal foundation

Some people seem to be under the misconception that real estate appraisers govern themselves via the Appraisal Institute. The Appraisal Institute is a private nonprofit organization for a few real estate appraisers. It's very expensive so there aren't that many members compared to total number of appraisers in the US. (There are 78,000 real estate appraisers with licenses as of 2018 in the US. Allegedly AI has 25,000 members in the world. They include retired and life time members. Because it's expensive to join I find it hard to believe they have 25,000 members). It has nothing to do with the government, licenses or regulations though they do sometimes publicly comment on issues which affect appraisers. The Appraisal Institute is NOT The Appraisal Foundation (TAF).

Real estate appraisers are regulated by federal and state governments. In 1989 the FIRREA Act (aka Savings & Loan bailout) established The Appraisal Foundation (TAF) and the  Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC). The Appraisal Foundation is authorized by Congress as the source of appraisal standards and appraiser qualifications. The Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council monitors and reviews the work of The Foundation. The Committee also maintains oversight authority over the states to ensure the minimum qualifying criteria to license and certify real estate appraisers are implemented and that appraisers are held to a professional set of ethical standards.  

The Appraisal Foundation’s Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) sets the minimum Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) develops the generally accepted standards of practice for the appraisal profession which is the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. These are reviewed every two years. Everyone can comment while they're being updated.

Each US state or territory has a real estate appraiser regulatory agency that is responsible for licensing and certifying real estate appraisers and supervising their appraisal-related activities, as required by Federal law. Here is a list of all the state regulatory agencies for real estate appraisers

Here in California we didn't need a license until 1994 after FIRREA passed. Real estate appraisers had nothing to do with the Savings & Loan crisis but as usual they were falsely blamed and later more heavily regulated. I fully support all real estate appraisers being licensed. It should have happened when they licensed real estate agents. I was both a real estate agent/broker and appraiser at the same time. I was first licensed as a real estate appraiser in 1994. I was licensed as a real estate agent in 1983 and broker in 1986. 

After the great recession the Dodd Frank Act was passed in 2010 which added even more regulations for banks, lenders and real estate appraisers. Again, real estate appraisers were blamed for the crisis. Real estate appraisers only report value based on past sales. We don't drive sales or affect the market. The problem was lenders giving loans to people regardless of their ability to pay them back. When the bubble burst many people who couldn't make their payments lost their homes. 

The Dodd Frank Act set up a system of Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) via the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC). "The Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) is a set of federal guidelines designed to make the home appraisal process more reliable. The HVCC prohibits mortgage brokers and real estate agents from selecting or paying appraisers. Instead, lenders or third-party companies selected by the lenders are the only parties allowed to contact, retain, and compensate appraisers. This adds a buffer between the appraiser and the interested parties trying to close the deal. Conventional conforming loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac must comply with the HVCC. FHA loans and VA loans are excluded from compliance with the HVCC." Instead of having the mortgage broker or real estate agent assign an appraiser the lender now hires the AMC who hires the appraisers. The AMC is the new middleman. The purpose was so the lender wouldn't be able to pressure the appraiser to hit an appraisal price. 

The concept of AMCs did not work. The appraiser still must contact the owner, borrower to inspect the property. The owner, borrower sometimes says "Here are some comparable sales from the lender and my real estate agent. I need a value over $500,000." Not only that but after the appraisal is submitted to the AMC who gives it to the lender the owner, borrower, lender, AMC can request a reconsideration of value, an appraisal appeal. They can request that certain other comparable sales and factors be considered. The lender can also make requests in underwriting. The addition of the AMC has only lead to increased appraisal costs, time and red tape for the borrower. 

The real estate appraiser does not have to make the requested changes unless they are legitimate. Obviously if you refuse legitimate changes you won't be hired again. The owner, borrower, lender can also order another appraisal. There are some agents, lenders who refuse to use certain appraisers because they didn't hit their price points in the past. The only thing AMCs did add is an extra middleman fee paid by the owner, borrower. If you are paying $650 for an appraisal, $300 goes to the AMC and $350 goes to the appraiser. If you want a review, it can cost even more. 

If you have a problem with an appraisal, request a reconsideration of value. Here's an article I wrote about how to do that. You can also call the appraiser. If you leave a ranting voicemail, they probably won't return your call. Their client is the AMC. The appraiser doesn't have to speak to you after the appraisal is completed. We only have to speak to the owner in order to inspect the home. 

If you have a problem with an appraiser that is beyond a reconsideration of value, you can file a complaint with the state where they are licensed. You can also file a complaint with the federal government depending upon the nature of the complaint. HUD handles discrimination complaints. Below describes the process for HUD housing discrimination complaints. If you as the home owner or borrower have a problem with an appraisal which was ordered for the lender, you don't have a legitimate legal basis for discrimination because you are not the intended user. Your complaint will be dismissed.  

https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/complaint-process

Below is a chart showing the outcome of HUD discrimination complaints for 2019. Most complaints are for disability discrimination and not skin color or race. Only 2% of the HUD housing discrimination complaints had cause. This is for 2019. 37% had no reasonable cause, 7% withdrawn, 36% conciliated, 14% administrative closure, 4% DOJ referral. This sounds about right. I've seen a few friends claim discrimination about a transaction. I ask them what happened. So far almost all of the time it wasn't discrimination that caused the issue. Most of the time it appears to be quick appreciation or a second appraiser appraising the property way above market value by using sales in a much superior area. Now when it comes to every day events I see discrimination all the time especially as it relates to skin color, gender, race. 


Right now August 2021 some buyers, borrowers feel they are being low-balled because some homes are under contract for more than they are appraised. Appraisals are coming in under purchase price. The problem is the skyrocketing market and limited supply which is causing people to bid over list price and over market value. Appraisers used sold comparables to support the value. That means we're 1-3 months behind the market at times. If there isn't a recent sale of a similar home we have to use older comps. We also can't appraise over the highest unadjusted sold comparable home even though we can time adjust. This is not our fault as we are following the law and regulations. It's happening to everyone regardless of color. Just because your appraisal came in low does not mean the appraiser was racist and discriminated against you. Appraising is a math formula based on home location, size, condition, amenities. Racism and discrimination exist. That doesn't mean every appraisal that is lower than what someone would like is the result of racism. The most common cause of loan denial is actually the creditworthiness of the borrower. 

More information below about real estate appraisal regulation. 

https://www.appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/About_Us/Appraiser_Regulatory_System/TAF/Regulatory_Structure.aspx

#realpropertyappraisers #realestateappraisers #realestateappraisal #hud #fha #marycummins #losangeles #california #firrea #doddfrankact #greatrecession #savingsandloanbailout #uniformstandardsofprofessionalappraisalpractice #uspap #appraisalfoundation #appraisalsubcommittee #asc #appraisersquallificationboard #aqb #complaint #realestate #appraisal 

Mary Cummins of Animal Advocates is a wildlife rehabilitator licensed by the California Department of Fish and Game and the USDA. Mary Cummins is also a licensed real estate appraiser in Los Angeles, California.


Google+ Mary Cummins, Mary K. Cummins, Mary Katherine Cummins, Mary Cummins-Cobb, Mary, Cummins, Cobb, wildlife, wild, animal, rescue, wildlife rehabilitation, wildlife rehabilitator, fish, game, los angeles, california, united states, squirrel, raccoon, fox, skunk, opossum, coyote, bobcat, manual, instructor, speaker, humane, nuisance, control, pest, trap, exclude, deter, green, non-profit, nonprofit, non, profit, ill, injured, orphaned, exhibit, exhibitor, usda, united states department of agriculture, hsus, humane society, peta, ndart, humane academy, humane officer, animal legal defense fund, animal cruelty, investigation, peace officer, animal, cruelty, abuse, neglect #marycummins #animaladvocates #losangeles #california #wildlife #wildliferehabilitation #wildliferehabilitator #realestate #realestateappraiser #realestateappraisal #lawsuit